Evaluating teachers' perceptions of students' questions organization

Fatima Harrak, François Bouchet, Vanda Luengo, P. Gillois
{"title":"Evaluating teachers' perceptions of students' questions organization","authors":"Fatima Harrak, François Bouchet, Vanda Luengo, P. Gillois","doi":"10.1145/3375462.3375509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students' questions are essential to help teachers in assessing their understanding and adapting their pedagogy. However, in a flipped classroom context where many questions are asked online to be addressed in class, selecting questions can be difficult for teachers. To help them in this task, we present here three alternative ways of organizing questions: one based on pedagogical needs, one based on estimated students' profiles and one mixing both approaches. Results of a survey filled by 37 teachers in a flipped classroom pedagogy show no consensus over a single organization. A cluster analysis based on teachers' flipped classroom experience allowed us to distinguish two profiles, but they were not associated with any particular question organization preference. Qualitative results suggest the need for different organizations may rely more on a pedagogical philosophy and advocates for differentiated dashboards.","PeriodicalId":355800,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Students' questions are essential to help teachers in assessing their understanding and adapting their pedagogy. However, in a flipped classroom context where many questions are asked online to be addressed in class, selecting questions can be difficult for teachers. To help them in this task, we present here three alternative ways of organizing questions: one based on pedagogical needs, one based on estimated students' profiles and one mixing both approaches. Results of a survey filled by 37 teachers in a flipped classroom pedagogy show no consensus over a single organization. A cluster analysis based on teachers' flipped classroom experience allowed us to distinguish two profiles, but they were not associated with any particular question organization preference. Qualitative results suggest the need for different organizations may rely more on a pedagogical philosophy and advocates for differentiated dashboards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估教师对学生问题组织的看法
学生的问题对于帮助教师评估他们的理解和调整他们的教学方法至关重要。然而,在翻转课堂的背景下,许多问题都是在网上提出的,在课堂上解决,选择问题对教师来说可能很困难。为了帮助他们完成这项任务,我们在这里提出了三种组织问题的替代方法:一种基于教学需求,一种基于估计的学生概况,还有一种混合了两种方法。一项由37名教师参与的翻转课堂教学法的调查结果显示,对单一组织没有达成共识。基于教师翻转课堂经验的聚类分析使我们能够区分两种概况,但它们与任何特定的问题组织偏好无关。定性结果表明,对不同组织的需求可能更多地依赖于一种教学理念,并倡导差异化的仪表板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How working memory capacity limits success in self-directed learning: a cognitive model of search and concept formation Quantifying data sensitivity: precise demonstration of care when building student prediction models Towards automated analysis of cognitive presence in MOOC discussions: a manual classification study Towards automatic cross-language classification of cognitive presence in online discussions What college students say, and what they do: aligning self-regulated learning theory with behavioral logs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1