Overt attempts to change hand preference: a study of group and individual characteristics.

C Porac, T Buller
{"title":"Overt attempts to change hand preference: a study of group and individual characteristics.","authors":"C Porac,&nbsp;T Buller","doi":"10.1037/h0084268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous work by Porac, Coren, and Searleman (1986) looked at overt attempts to change hand preference from the left to the right side. We extended this research by studying individuals who shifted their handedness from the left to the right side as well as a group who attempted a shift in the opposite direction (right to left). Comparisons of the two shift attempts revealed that the timing, method, and agent of change differed significantly for right versus left shifts. More right than left shifts were successful. Overall, most shift attempts were rated as unsuccessful because they did not result in a handedness classification consistent with the direction of the shift. Individuals classified as successful shifters, whether in the right or left direction, displayed a more ambihanded behavioural pattern than either unsuccessful shifters or the no shift control group. Evidence suggested that left-shift attempts were promoted by original ambihanded tendencies but that ambihandedness in successful right shifts stemmed from the partial success of the switch attempt.</p>","PeriodicalId":75671,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of psychology","volume":"44 4","pages":"512-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0084268","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Previous work by Porac, Coren, and Searleman (1986) looked at overt attempts to change hand preference from the left to the right side. We extended this research by studying individuals who shifted their handedness from the left to the right side as well as a group who attempted a shift in the opposite direction (right to left). Comparisons of the two shift attempts revealed that the timing, method, and agent of change differed significantly for right versus left shifts. More right than left shifts were successful. Overall, most shift attempts were rated as unsuccessful because they did not result in a handedness classification consistent with the direction of the shift. Individuals classified as successful shifters, whether in the right or left direction, displayed a more ambihanded behavioural pattern than either unsuccessful shifters or the no shift control group. Evidence suggested that left-shift attempts were promoted by original ambihanded tendencies but that ambihandedness in successful right shifts stemmed from the partial success of the switch attempt.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公开尝试改变手的偏好:群体和个人特征的研究。
Porac、Coren和Searleman(1986)之前的研究着眼于将左手偏好改变为右手偏好的公开尝试。我们扩展了这项研究,研究了将惯用手从左移到右的人,以及试图将惯用手从右移到左的人。两种移位尝试的比较表明,时间、方法和改变的代理人在右移和左移上有显著差异。向右移动比向左移动更成功。总的来说,大多数换挡尝试被认为是不成功的,因为它们没有导致与换挡方向一致的惯用手分类。被归类为成功转移者的个体,无论是在右方向还是在左方向,都比不成功转移者或没有转移的对照组表现出更多的双重性行为模式。有证据表明,最初的双手倾向促进了左移的尝试,但成功的右移中的双手倾向源于部分成功的转换尝试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
La langue et les Lèvres: cross-language influences on bimodal speech perception. Neural and behavioural effects of domoic acid, an amnesic shellfish toxin, in the rat. Object identification in context: the visual processing of natural scenes. Eye movements and scene perception. Parallel pattern processing and visual agnosia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1