Regression verification of AADL models through slicing of system dependence graphs

Andreas Johnsen, K. Lundqvist, P. Pettersson, Kaj Hänninen
{"title":"Regression verification of AADL models through slicing of system dependence graphs","authors":"Andreas Johnsen, K. Lundqvist, P. Pettersson, Kaj Hänninen","doi":"10.1145/2602576.2602589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Design artifacts of embedded systems are subjected to a number of modifications during the development process. Verified artifacts that subsequently are modified must necessarily be re-verified to ensure that no faults have been introduced in response to the modification. We collectively call this type of verification as regression verification. In this paper, we contribute with a technique for selective regression verification of embedded systems modeled in the Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL). The technique can be used with any AADL-based verification technique to efficiently perform regression verification by only selecting verification sequences that cover parts that are affected by the modification for re-execution. This allows for the avoidance of unnecessary re-verification, and thereby unnecessary costs. The selection is based on the concept of specification slicing through system dependence graphs (SDGs) such that the effect of a modification can be identified.","PeriodicalId":110790,"journal":{"name":"International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on Quality of Software Architectures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2602576.2602589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Design artifacts of embedded systems are subjected to a number of modifications during the development process. Verified artifacts that subsequently are modified must necessarily be re-verified to ensure that no faults have been introduced in response to the modification. We collectively call this type of verification as regression verification. In this paper, we contribute with a technique for selective regression verification of embedded systems modeled in the Architecture Analysis and Design Language (AADL). The technique can be used with any AADL-based verification technique to efficiently perform regression verification by only selecting verification sequences that cover parts that are affected by the modification for re-execution. This allows for the avoidance of unnecessary re-verification, and thereby unnecessary costs. The selection is based on the concept of specification slicing through system dependence graphs (SDGs) such that the effect of a modification can be identified.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于系统依赖图切片的AADL模型回归验证
嵌入式系统的设计工件在开发过程中会受到许多修改。随后被修改的已验证工件必须被重新验证,以确保在响应修改时没有引入错误。我们统称这种验证为回归验证。在本文中,我们提供了一种用体系结构分析与设计语言(AADL)建模的嵌入式系统的选择性回归验证技术。该技术可以与任何基于aadl的验证技术一起使用,通过只选择覆盖受修改影响的部分的验证序列来有效地执行回归验证。这样可以避免不必要的重新核查,从而避免不必要的费用。选择是基于通过系统依赖图(sdg)进行规范切片的概念,这样就可以识别修改的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An empirical investigation of modularity metrics for indicating architectural technical debt Evaluation of a static architectural conformance checking method in a line of computer games Dealing with uncertainties in the performance modelling of software systems Designing and evolving distributed architecture using kevoree Formalizing correspondence rules for automotive architecture views
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1