Efficacy of Machine Learning-Based Classifiers for Binary and Multi-Class Network Intrusion Detection

Toya Acharya, Ishan Khatri, A. Annamalai, M. Chouikha
{"title":"Efficacy of Machine Learning-Based Classifiers for Binary and Multi-Class Network Intrusion Detection","authors":"Toya Acharya, Ishan Khatri, A. Annamalai, M. Chouikha","doi":"10.1109/I2CACIS52118.2021.9495877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The internet-based services undoubtedly led the worldwide revolution with exponential growth, but security breaches resulting personal digital asset losses which need for a comprehensive cybersecurity solution. Traditionally, signature-based network intrusion detection is employed to capture attributes of normal and abnormal traffics in a network, but it fails to detect the zero-day attack. The machine learning-based approach is attractive among various known NIDS methods to circumvent the shortcoming because machine learning based approach can efficiently analyze the big network traffic data and efficiently detect the zero-day attack. The imbalanced NIDS dataset does not provide better performance on practical implementation scenarios. Reducing the number of target classes into a new target class creates a balanced NIDS and improved classifier performance. In this paper, we present the efficacy of several machine learning algorithms, including Random forest (RF), J48, Naïve Bayes, Bayesian Network, Bagging, AdaBoost, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) using network logs traffic (KDD99, UNSW-NB15, and CIC-IDS2017) using WEKA. This paper examined the impact of changing the number of output classes of the publicly available network intrusion datasets on sensitivity (True Positive Rate), False Positive Rate (FPR), Area under the ROC curve (AUC) and incorrectly identified percentage. Interestingly, the efficiency of these classifiers has increased, adding strongly correlated features to the target classes. The experimented results reveal that the machine learning classifiers performance improved when the number of target classes decreased. The addition of a highly correlated feature to the output class increases the performance of the classifiers.","PeriodicalId":210770,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control & Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Automatic Control & Intelligent Systems (I2CACIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2CACIS52118.2021.9495877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The internet-based services undoubtedly led the worldwide revolution with exponential growth, but security breaches resulting personal digital asset losses which need for a comprehensive cybersecurity solution. Traditionally, signature-based network intrusion detection is employed to capture attributes of normal and abnormal traffics in a network, but it fails to detect the zero-day attack. The machine learning-based approach is attractive among various known NIDS methods to circumvent the shortcoming because machine learning based approach can efficiently analyze the big network traffic data and efficiently detect the zero-day attack. The imbalanced NIDS dataset does not provide better performance on practical implementation scenarios. Reducing the number of target classes into a new target class creates a balanced NIDS and improved classifier performance. In this paper, we present the efficacy of several machine learning algorithms, including Random forest (RF), J48, Naïve Bayes, Bayesian Network, Bagging, AdaBoost, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) using network logs traffic (KDD99, UNSW-NB15, and CIC-IDS2017) using WEKA. This paper examined the impact of changing the number of output classes of the publicly available network intrusion datasets on sensitivity (True Positive Rate), False Positive Rate (FPR), Area under the ROC curve (AUC) and incorrectly identified percentage. Interestingly, the efficiency of these classifiers has increased, adding strongly correlated features to the target classes. The experimented results reveal that the machine learning classifiers performance improved when the number of target classes decreased. The addition of a highly correlated feature to the output class increases the performance of the classifiers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的分类器在二元和多类网络入侵检测中的有效性
基于互联网的服务无疑以指数级增长引领了全球革命,但安全漏洞导致个人数字资产损失,这需要一个全面的网络安全解决方案。传统的基于签名的网络入侵检测主要用于捕获网络中正常流量和异常流量的属性,但无法检测到零日攻击。基于机器学习的方法可以有效地分析大网络流量数据并有效地检测零日攻击,因此在各种已知的NIDS方法中具有很大的吸引力。不平衡的NIDS数据集在实际实现场景中不能提供更好的性能。将目标类的数量减少到一个新的目标类可以创建一个平衡的NIDS并提高分类器的性能。在本文中,我们展示了几种机器学习算法的有效性,包括随机森林(RF), J48, Naïve贝叶斯,贝叶斯网络,Bagging, AdaBoost和支持向量机(SVM),使用WEKA使用网络日志流量(KDD99, UNSW-NB15和ics - ids2017)。本文研究了改变公开可用的网络入侵数据集的输出类别数量对灵敏度(真阳性率)、假阳性率(FPR)、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和错误识别百分比的影响。有趣的是,这些分类器的效率提高了,向目标类添加了强相关的特征。实验结果表明,当目标类别数量减少时,机器学习分类器的性能有所提高。向输出类添加高度相关的特征可以提高分类器的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Non-Linear Analytical Mathematical Modelling of a Hybrid Fixed-Wing Unmanned Aerial Vehicle in Pusher Configuration Efficacy of Heterogeneous Ensemble Assisted Machine Learning Model for Binary and Multi-Class Network Intrusion Detection Arrhythmia Detection using Electrocardiogram and Phonocardiogram Pattern using Integrated Signal Processing Algorithms with the Aid of Convolutional Neural Networks Reduced Computational Burden Model Predictive Current Control of Asymmetric Stacked Multi-Level Inverter Based STATCOM Analysis of Kaffir Lime Oil Chemical Compounds by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) and Z-Score Technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1