{"title":"Standford's Summer Research Program for Teachers Long-Term Outcomes Study","authors":"K. Storm, Gary Lichtenstein","doi":"10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Experience for Teachers (RET) programs have been placing K-12 teachers in university research labs for almost three decades (Pop et al., 2010). However, the long-term impacts are rarely explored. This paper summarizes data from a survey study of 135/158 teachers (88% response rate) who participated in Stanford University’s RET programs between 2005 and 2017. The purpose of the study was to gauge the lasting impact of RET, if any, on teacher retention and classroom and professional practices. The data strongly suggest that participants gain long-lasting personal and professional benefits from participation--value that seems to be especially magnified for mid- to late-career teachers who are well established in their teaching practices but committed to continuous improvement. Furthermore, if the self-reports are accurate, these results would presumably also accrue to teachers’ students. Findings are attributed to the efficacy of the RET model. The authors argue for a nationwide evaluation of the efficacy of RET for teacher retention and professional development.","PeriodicalId":371616,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of STEM Outreach","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15695/JSTEM/V2I1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Research Experience for Teachers (RET) programs have been placing K-12 teachers in university research labs for almost three decades (Pop et al., 2010). However, the long-term impacts are rarely explored. This paper summarizes data from a survey study of 135/158 teachers (88% response rate) who participated in Stanford University’s RET programs between 2005 and 2017. The purpose of the study was to gauge the lasting impact of RET, if any, on teacher retention and classroom and professional practices. The data strongly suggest that participants gain long-lasting personal and professional benefits from participation--value that seems to be especially magnified for mid- to late-career teachers who are well established in their teaching practices but committed to continuous improvement. Furthermore, if the self-reports are accurate, these results would presumably also accrue to teachers’ students. Findings are attributed to the efficacy of the RET model. The authors argue for a nationwide evaluation of the efficacy of RET for teacher retention and professional development.
教师研究经验(RET)项目已经将K-12教师安置在大学研究实验室近三十年了(Pop et al, 2010)。然而,其长期影响却很少被探讨。本文总结了2005年至2017年参与斯坦福大学RET项目的135/158名教师(回复率88%)的调查研究数据。这项研究的目的是衡量教育绩效评估对教师留任、课堂教学和专业实践的持久影响。这些数据有力地表明,参与者从参与中获得了长期的个人和专业利益——对于那些在教学实践中已经站稳脚跟但致力于持续改进的中后期职业教师来说,这种价值似乎被放大了。此外,如果自我报告是准确的,这些结果可能也会对教师的学生产生影响。这些发现归功于RET模型的有效性。作者主张在全国范围内对教师留任和专业发展的RET效果进行评估。