{"title":"General Procedure","authors":"David Blake","doi":"10.1061/9780784415962.ch02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do I select the right parametric form for an age function? There is no \" right \" parametric form to add at any stage of the model. Fitting an exploratory non-parametric term gives you an idea about what the shape of a suitable age function should be (given the existing age/period terms in your model), but there may be several candidate functions available to you from your \" toolkit \" of age functions. Selecting the most appropriate of these is usually a matter of trying them, seeing which gives the best fit to the data, whether they are robust to changes made to other age/period terms in the model, and whether they, in turn, influence other age/period terms. Expert judgement is required to balance these competing factors. Do I fix the parameters for the age and period functions found at previous stages or re-estimate them at each stage? All parameters should be re-estimated at each stage as a check on the robustness of the model. One technique may be to re-estimate all the parameters at each stage, but use the values found previously as the starting point for your maximisation procedure. However, this may lead to a final fitted set of parameters which is not robust to different initial parameter estimates. It also may lead to an inefficient fitting algorithm as the final model can only be estimated by sequentially estimating all of the preceding models in order to provide initial parameter estimates. Therefore, we suggest that this approach should be avoided in the final model. Please see the question below for our approach to setting the initial parameter estimates for the fitting algorithm. The only exception to this is when a new non-parametric age function is added to the model. Mixed models, with non-parametric and parametric age functions (with freely varying parameters) are often unstable and the fitting algorithms may not converge. We therefore fixed the values of the age function parameters to be those estimated previously to avoid this. As the non-parametric terms are added purely to explore the data and will be replaced with parametric functions later (when everything will be re-estimated) we believe this procedure is justifiable.","PeriodicalId":245158,"journal":{"name":"Site-Specific Ground Motions for Seismic Design of Buildings and Other Structures","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Site-Specific Ground Motions for Seismic Design of Buildings and Other Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784415962.ch02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

How do I select the right parametric form for an age function? There is no " right " parametric form to add at any stage of the model. Fitting an exploratory non-parametric term gives you an idea about what the shape of a suitable age function should be (given the existing age/period terms in your model), but there may be several candidate functions available to you from your " toolkit " of age functions. Selecting the most appropriate of these is usually a matter of trying them, seeing which gives the best fit to the data, whether they are robust to changes made to other age/period terms in the model, and whether they, in turn, influence other age/period terms. Expert judgement is required to balance these competing factors. Do I fix the parameters for the age and period functions found at previous stages or re-estimate them at each stage? All parameters should be re-estimated at each stage as a check on the robustness of the model. One technique may be to re-estimate all the parameters at each stage, but use the values found previously as the starting point for your maximisation procedure. However, this may lead to a final fitted set of parameters which is not robust to different initial parameter estimates. It also may lead to an inefficient fitting algorithm as the final model can only be estimated by sequentially estimating all of the preceding models in order to provide initial parameter estimates. Therefore, we suggest that this approach should be avoided in the final model. Please see the question below for our approach to setting the initial parameter estimates for the fitting algorithm. The only exception to this is when a new non-parametric age function is added to the model. Mixed models, with non-parametric and parametric age functions (with freely varying parameters) are often unstable and the fitting algorithms may not converge. We therefore fixed the values of the age function parameters to be those estimated previously to avoid this. As the non-parametric terms are added purely to explore the data and will be replaced with parametric functions later (when everything will be re-estimated) we believe this procedure is justifiable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一般程序
如何为年龄函数选择正确的参数形式?在模型的任何阶段都没有“正确”的参数形式可以添加。拟合一个探索性非参数项可以让您了解合适的年龄函数的形状(给定模型中现有的年龄/时期项),但是从年龄函数的“工具包”中可能有几个候选函数可供您使用。选择其中最合适的通常是尝试它们,看看哪一个最适合数据,它们是否对模型中其他年龄/时期项的变化具有鲁棒性,以及它们是否反过来影响其他年龄/时期项。需要专家的判断来平衡这些相互竞争的因素。我是固定在前阶段发现的年龄和周期函数的参数,还是在每个阶段重新估计它们?所有参数应在每个阶段重新估计作为对模型鲁棒性的检查。一种技术可能是在每个阶段重新估计所有参数,但使用之前发现的值作为最大化过程的起点。然而,这可能导致最终拟合的参数集对不同的初始参数估计不具有鲁棒性。它还可能导致拟合算法效率低下,因为最终模型只能通过顺序估计所有前面的模型来估计,以提供初始参数估计。因此,我们建议在最终模型中应避免这种方法。关于我们为拟合算法设置初始参数估计的方法,请参见下面的问题。唯一的例外是当一个新的非参数年龄函数被添加到模型中时。具有非参数和参数年龄函数(参数自由变化)的混合模型往往不稳定,拟合算法可能不收敛。因此,我们将年龄函数参数的值固定为先前估计的值,以避免这种情况。由于添加非参数项纯粹是为了探索数据,稍后将用参数函数替换(当所有内容都将被重新估计时),我们认为这个过程是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ground Motion Hazard Analysis Response Spectrum of Ground Motion GMHA for a Site in California Ground Motions for Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Buildings Ground Motions for Design of Bridges, LNG Tanks, and Tall Buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1