Comparison of scar outcomes of alar base and columella using irradiated polyglactin 911: a single-blind study

M. Ceylan, T. Yücel
{"title":"Comparison of scar outcomes of alar base and columella using irradiated polyglactin 911: a single-blind study","authors":"M. Ceylan, T. Yücel","doi":"10.38053/acmj.1249691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The formation of scars on the face after open septorhinoplasty (SRP) with alar base reduction may disturb the patient due to cosmetic concerns. This study aimed to compare scar outcomes of the columella and alar base in patients undergoing SRP. \nMaterial and Method: Twenty-seven patients who underwent alar base reduction during primary open SRP were divided into two groups according to the intervened area as the Columella (CLM) group (n=27) and the Alar Base (AB) group (n=27). Irradiated polyglactin 911 was used in all patients. The modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) and a questionnaire form were used to measure scar outcomes and patient satisfaction. Columellar and alar base scar outcomes were compared. \nResults: Patient satisfaction and scar outcomes were better in the CLM group. There was no significant difference, except for the first month total SBSES scores, between the CLM and AB groups. There was no significant difference in patient questionnaire scores between groups. In the early period, there were more signs of inflammation in the alar base than in the columella, without statistical significance. \nConclusion: Patient satisfaction and scar outcomes in the columellar area were favorable. Scar outcome on the alar base was statistically significantly worse than columella in the early period. There was no statistically significant difference between both areas in the long-term. Irradiated rapid vicryl can be used for closure of the alar base and columella, considering its advantages and disadvantages, in patients undergoing open septorhinoplasty with alar base reduction.","PeriodicalId":307693,"journal":{"name":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatolian Current Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38053/acmj.1249691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The formation of scars on the face after open septorhinoplasty (SRP) with alar base reduction may disturb the patient due to cosmetic concerns. This study aimed to compare scar outcomes of the columella and alar base in patients undergoing SRP. Material and Method: Twenty-seven patients who underwent alar base reduction during primary open SRP were divided into two groups according to the intervened area as the Columella (CLM) group (n=27) and the Alar Base (AB) group (n=27). Irradiated polyglactin 911 was used in all patients. The modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale (SBSES) and a questionnaire form were used to measure scar outcomes and patient satisfaction. Columellar and alar base scar outcomes were compared. Results: Patient satisfaction and scar outcomes were better in the CLM group. There was no significant difference, except for the first month total SBSES scores, between the CLM and AB groups. There was no significant difference in patient questionnaire scores between groups. In the early period, there were more signs of inflammation in the alar base than in the columella, without statistical significance. Conclusion: Patient satisfaction and scar outcomes in the columellar area were favorable. Scar outcome on the alar base was statistically significantly worse than columella in the early period. There was no statistically significant difference between both areas in the long-term. Irradiated rapid vicryl can be used for closure of the alar base and columella, considering its advantages and disadvantages, in patients undergoing open septorhinoplasty with alar base reduction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用聚乳酸蛋白911照射鼻翼基部和鼻梁瘢痕结局的比较:一项单盲研究
目的:鼻中隔切开成形术(SRP)鼻翼底部缩小后,由于美容方面的考虑,面部疤痕的形成可能会困扰患者。本研究旨在比较SRP患者小柱和鼻翼基底的疤痕结局。材料与方法:27例首次行开放性鼻翼基部复位手术的患者,根据介入面积分为小柱(CLM)组(n=27)和鼻翼基部(AB)组(n=27)。所有患者均使用辐照聚乳酸蛋白911。采用改良的石溪疤痕评价量表(SBSES)和问卷形式测量疤痕结局和患者满意度。小柱和鼻翼基部瘢痕的预后比较。结果:CLM组患者满意度和瘢痕结局较CLM组好。CLM组和AB组之间除了第一个月的总SBSES得分外,没有显著差异。两组患者问卷得分无显著差异。早期鼻翼基部炎症征象多于鼻梁,但无统计学意义。结论:患者满意度和小柱区瘢痕预后良好。鼻翼基部瘢痕预后较早期小柱差,差异有统计学意义。从长期来看,这两个区域之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在鼻中隔成形术合并鼻翼底部缩小的患者中,考虑到其优缺点,辐照快速维氏针可用于鼻翼底部和鼻梁的闭合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pan-immune inflammation value as a biomarker in ankylosing spondilitis and associated with disease activity ChatGPT in medical writing: enhancing healthcare communication through artificial intelligence and human expertise Temporal alterations in P-wave electrocardiographic metrics post patent foramen ovale closure: a retrospective study Asymptomatic COVID-19 and structural changes in the brain Exploring the nexus: prevalence, risk factors, and clinical correlations of urinary tract infections in diabetes mellitus patients - a comprehensive retrospective analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1