Trustworthy Misinformation Mitigation with Soft Information Nudging

Benjamin D. Horne, Mauricio G. Gruppi, Sibel Adali
{"title":"Trustworthy Misinformation Mitigation with Soft Information Nudging","authors":"Benjamin D. Horne, Mauricio G. Gruppi, Sibel Adali","doi":"10.1109/TPS-ISA48467.2019.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in combating misinformation reports many negative results: facts may not change minds, especially if they come from sources that are not trusted. Individuals can disregard and justify lies told by trusted sources. This problem is made even worse by social recommendation algorithms which help amplify conspiracy theories and information confirming one's own biases due to companies' efforts to optimize for clicks and watch time over individuals' own values and public good. As a result, more nuanced voices and facts are drowned out by a continuous erosion of trust in better information sources. Most misinformation mitigation techniques assume that discrediting, filtering, or demoting low veracity information will help news consumers make better information decisions. However, these negative results indicate that some news consumers, particularly extreme or conspiracy news consumers will not be helped. We argue that, given this background, technology solutions to combating misinformation should not simply seek facts or discredit bad news sources, but instead use more subtle nudges towards better information consumption. Repeated exposure to such nudges can help promote trust in better information sources and also improve societal outcomes in the long run. In this article, we will talk about technological solutions that can help us in developing such an approach, and introduce one such model called Trust Nudging.","PeriodicalId":129820,"journal":{"name":"2019 First IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)","volume":"248 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 First IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS-ISA48467.2019.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Research in combating misinformation reports many negative results: facts may not change minds, especially if they come from sources that are not trusted. Individuals can disregard and justify lies told by trusted sources. This problem is made even worse by social recommendation algorithms which help amplify conspiracy theories and information confirming one's own biases due to companies' efforts to optimize for clicks and watch time over individuals' own values and public good. As a result, more nuanced voices and facts are drowned out by a continuous erosion of trust in better information sources. Most misinformation mitigation techniques assume that discrediting, filtering, or demoting low veracity information will help news consumers make better information decisions. However, these negative results indicate that some news consumers, particularly extreme or conspiracy news consumers will not be helped. We argue that, given this background, technology solutions to combating misinformation should not simply seek facts or discredit bad news sources, but instead use more subtle nudges towards better information consumption. Repeated exposure to such nudges can help promote trust in better information sources and also improve societal outcomes in the long run. In this article, we will talk about technological solutions that can help us in developing such an approach, and introduce one such model called Trust Nudging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可信赖的错误信息缓解与软信息推动
打击虚假信息的研究报告了许多负面结果:事实可能不会改变人们的想法,尤其是当它们来自不可信的来源时。个人可以无视可信来源的谎言,也可以为其辩护。社交推荐算法使这个问题变得更糟,这些算法有助于放大阴谋论和确认个人偏见的信息,因为公司努力优化点击量,关注个人自身价值观和公共利益。结果,更微妙的声音和事实被对更好的信息来源的信任不断侵蚀所淹没。大多数缓解错误信息的技术都假定,对低真实性信息进行抹黑、过滤或降级将有助于新闻消费者做出更好的信息决策。然而,这些负面结果表明,一些新闻消费者,特别是极端或阴谋新闻消费者不会得到帮助。我们认为,在这种背景下,打击错误信息的技术解决方案不应该简单地寻求事实或诋毁坏消息来源,而是使用更微妙的推动来实现更好的信息消费。反复接触这样的推动有助于促进对更好的信息来源的信任,从长远来看也会改善社会结果。在本文中,我们将讨论可以帮助我们开发这种方法的技术解决方案,并介绍一种称为“信任推动”的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Performance Evaluation of CAN Encryption Title Page I Disincentivizing Double Spend Attacks Across Interoperable Blockchains User Acceptance of Usable Blockchain-Based Research Data Sharing System: An Extended TAM-Based Study Next Generation Smart Built Environments: The Fusion of Empathy, Privacy and Ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1