Parental Uncertainty About a Child’s Health Scale (PUCHS): Development and Validation of a Novel Measure

K. L. Umstead, S. Woolford, Ellen F. Macnamara, T. Yanes, K. Brothers, P. Han, Julie C. Sapp, M. Crenshaw, Cristofer S. Price, B. Biesecker
{"title":"Parental Uncertainty About a Child’s Health Scale (PUCHS): Development and Validation of a Novel Measure","authors":"K. L. Umstead, S. Woolford, Ellen F. Macnamara, T. Yanes, K. Brothers, P. Han, Julie C. Sapp, M. Crenshaw, Cristofer S. Price, B. Biesecker","doi":"10.52504/001c.68103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding perceptions of uncertainty among parents of children with chronic conditions—and health care providers’ opportunities to help parents effectively cope—is limited by existing measures. To develop a novel, outcomes-oriented scale to measure parental perceptions of uncertainties about the health of a child. Informed by existing literature and interviews with parents, items were generated to capture disease-centered uncertainties (about diagnosis, prognosis, treatment) and patient-centered uncertainties (about familial, reproductive, social, and existential implications). After pilot testing, the Parental Uncertainty About a Child’s Health Scale (PUCHS) was administered in 3 studies assessing parental uncertainty in the context of caring for a child with an undiagnosed medical condition. Data from 2 studies (n = 149) were used to refine the hypothesized measurement model, and data from a third study (n = 417) were used to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis to determine the fit of the resulting measurement model. A 4-factor model (diagnostic, therapeutic, familial, social) satisfied overall model fit statistics and structural validity as indicated by standardized loadings, reliability, and variance extracted for each of the constructs. Additionally, each of the constructs satisfied convergent and discriminant validity. These findings across multiple samples in varying contexts suggest that the model demonstrates configural invariance across applications. As a valid, reliable measure of parental uncertainties about children with chronic undiagnosed medical conditions, the PUCHS will advance understanding and thereby inform development of interventions to manage uncertainties. Communication of these uncertainties and their effective management are fundamental components of patient-centered care.","PeriodicalId":340325,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Medical Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Medical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52504/001c.68103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding perceptions of uncertainty among parents of children with chronic conditions—and health care providers’ opportunities to help parents effectively cope—is limited by existing measures. To develop a novel, outcomes-oriented scale to measure parental perceptions of uncertainties about the health of a child. Informed by existing literature and interviews with parents, items were generated to capture disease-centered uncertainties (about diagnosis, prognosis, treatment) and patient-centered uncertainties (about familial, reproductive, social, and existential implications). After pilot testing, the Parental Uncertainty About a Child’s Health Scale (PUCHS) was administered in 3 studies assessing parental uncertainty in the context of caring for a child with an undiagnosed medical condition. Data from 2 studies (n = 149) were used to refine the hypothesized measurement model, and data from a third study (n = 417) were used to conduct a confirmatory factor analysis to determine the fit of the resulting measurement model. A 4-factor model (diagnostic, therapeutic, familial, social) satisfied overall model fit statistics and structural validity as indicated by standardized loadings, reliability, and variance extracted for each of the constructs. Additionally, each of the constructs satisfied convergent and discriminant validity. These findings across multiple samples in varying contexts suggest that the model demonstrates configural invariance across applications. As a valid, reliable measure of parental uncertainties about children with chronic undiagnosed medical conditions, the PUCHS will advance understanding and thereby inform development of interventions to manage uncertainties. Communication of these uncertainties and their effective management are fundamental components of patient-centered care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母对儿童健康量表(PUCHS)的不确定性:一种新测量方法的开发与验证
了解慢性病儿童父母对不确定性的看法,以及卫生保健提供者帮助父母有效应对的机会,受到现有措施的限制。开发一种新颖的、以结果为导向的量表来衡量父母对孩子健康不确定性的看法。根据现有文献和对父母的访谈,生成了以疾病为中心的不确定性(关于诊断、预后、治疗)和以患者为中心的不确定性(关于家庭、生殖、社会和存在的影响)。在试点测试后,在3项研究中使用父母对儿童健康的不确定性量表(PUCHS)来评估父母在照顾患有未确诊疾病的儿童时的不确定性。我们使用2项研究(n = 149)的数据来完善假设的测量模型,并使用第三项研究(n = 417)的数据进行验证性因子分析,以确定所得测量模型的拟合性。一个四因素模型(诊断、治疗、家庭、社会)满足整体模型拟合统计和结构效度,如标准化负荷、信度和每个结构提取的方差所示。此外,每个构念都满足收敛效度和区分效度。这些发现跨越了不同上下文中的多个样本,表明该模型展示了跨应用程序的配置不变性。作为父母对患有慢性未确诊疾病的儿童的不确定性的有效、可靠的衡量标准,PUCHS将促进理解,从而为制定管理不确定性的干预措施提供信息。这些不确定因素的沟通及其有效管理是以患者为中心的护理的基本组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fostering open dialogue: Creating safe spaces for adolescents to discuss sexual health Review of minimally disruptive in vitro fertilization (IVF) approaches as a strategy for assisted human conception Does Propecia Cause More Harms than Good: Assessing Reproductive and Non-Reproductive Effects of Finasteride on Male Health Computer-mediated Communication and Healthcare Satisfaction among Middle-aged Men Living with or without HIV The Use of Stem Cells in Cardiac Pathologies: A Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1