Dissidents and dissenters: student responses to apartheid at the University of Fort Hare

Pamela Johnson
{"title":"Dissidents and dissenters: student responses to apartheid at the University of Fort Hare","authors":"Pamela Johnson","doi":"10.18820/24150509/JCH44.V1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the only university for black students in Southern Africa in the first half of the twentieth century, the University of Fort Hare is the alma mater of prominent African leaders and intellectuals. It is also known for the role played by students in the struggle against the apartheid state that seized control over the university in 1960. However, the common representation of students as unified in resistance belies the fact that the student body was divided, with many reluctant to participate in protests during the apartheid era. These students were named ‘dissenters’ by the activists – termed ‘dissidents’ by the author – as they were considered as obstructing the struggle for freedom. Utilising the Gramscian approach to the exercise of hegemony in the form of the reasons for conformity proposed by Joseph Femia, this paper examines the actions and behaviour of both the dissidents and dissenters, based on documents that comprised the personal files of the apartheid era rectors (1960 to 1990). These files contained letters, memoranda and minutes of meetings, notes and telegrams, as well as confiscated student posters and letters from students directed to the rectors. The findings propose that the behaviour of dissenters was based on either the fear of possible repercussions of opposing the apartheid system or the desire not to sacrifice small gains that had been made. This points to the underlying quest for security in a violent and uncertain society.","PeriodicalId":409914,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Contemporary History","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150509/JCH44.V1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the only university for black students in Southern Africa in the first half of the twentieth century, the University of Fort Hare is the alma mater of prominent African leaders and intellectuals. It is also known for the role played by students in the struggle against the apartheid state that seized control over the university in 1960. However, the common representation of students as unified in resistance belies the fact that the student body was divided, with many reluctant to participate in protests during the apartheid era. These students were named ‘dissenters’ by the activists – termed ‘dissidents’ by the author – as they were considered as obstructing the struggle for freedom. Utilising the Gramscian approach to the exercise of hegemony in the form of the reasons for conformity proposed by Joseph Femia, this paper examines the actions and behaviour of both the dissidents and dissenters, based on documents that comprised the personal files of the apartheid era rectors (1960 to 1990). These files contained letters, memoranda and minutes of meetings, notes and telegrams, as well as confiscated student posters and letters from students directed to the rectors. The findings propose that the behaviour of dissenters was based on either the fear of possible repercussions of opposing the apartheid system or the desire not to sacrifice small gains that had been made. This points to the underlying quest for security in a violent and uncertain society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
持不同政见者与持不同政见者:黑尔堡大学学生对种族隔离的反应
作为20世纪上半叶南部非洲唯一一所黑人学生的大学,黑尔堡大学是杰出非洲领导人和知识分子的母校。它也因学生在反对种族隔离国家的斗争中所发挥的作用而闻名。1960年,南非政府控制了这所大学。然而,学生团结抵抗的普遍表现掩盖了一个事实,即学生群体是分裂的,许多人在种族隔离时代不愿参加抗议活动。这些学生被活动人士称为“持不同政见者”,被作者称为“持不同政见者”,因为他们被认为阻碍了争取自由的斗争。本文利用约瑟夫·费米亚(Joseph Femia)提出的以一致性原因的形式行使霸权的葛兰西方法,基于包含种族隔离时代校长(1960年至1990年)个人档案的文件,研究了持不同政见者和持不同政见者的行动和行为。这些文件包括信件、备忘录和会议记录、笔记和电报,以及没收的学生海报和学生写给校长的信。调查结果表明,持不同政见者的行为要么是出于对反对种族隔离制度可能产生的后果的恐惧,要么是不想牺牲已经取得的微小成果。这表明了在一个暴力和不确定的社会中对安全的根本追求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WINDS OF SMALL CHANGE: CHIEFS, CHIEFLY POWERS, EVOLVING POLITICS AND THE STATE IN ZIMBABWE, 1985–1999. UNFULFILLED POTENTIAL: CONFINED DESTINY OF HISTORICAL STUDIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF FORT HARE, 1960 -2015 Profile: Dr Adewumi Damilola Adebayo Book Review: A Constitutional History of the Kingdom of Eswatini (Swaziland), 1960–1982 Book Review: Exchanging symbols: monuments and memorials in post-apartheid South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1