Improvement of object reference recognition through human robot alignment

Mitsuhiko Kimoto, T. Iio, M. Shiomi, I. Tanev, K. Shimohara, N. Hagita
{"title":"Improvement of object reference recognition through human robot alignment","authors":"Mitsuhiko Kimoto, T. Iio, M. Shiomi, I. Tanev, K. Shimohara, N. Hagita","doi":"10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports an interactive approach to improve the recognition performance by robots of objects indicated by humans during human-robot interaction. We developed an approach based on two findings in conversations where a human refers to an object, which is confirmed by a robot. First, humans tend to use the same words or gestures as the robot in a phenomenon called alignment. Second, humans tend to decrease the amount of information in their references when the robot uses excess information in its confirmations: in other words, alignment inhibition. These findings lead to the following design; a robot should use enough information without being excessive to identify objects to improve recognition accuracy because humans will eventually use similar information to refer to those objects by alignment. If humans more frequently use the same information to identify objects, the robot can more easily recognize those being indicated by humans. To verify our design, we developed a robotic system to recognize the objects to which humans referred and conducted a control experiment that had 2 × 3 conditions; one factor was the robot's confirmation way and another was the arrangement of the objects. The first factor had two levels to identify objects: enough information and excess information. The second factor had three levels: congestion, two groups, and a sparse set. We measured the recognition accuracy of the objects humans referred to and the amount of information in their references. The success rate of the recognition and information amount was higher in the adequate information condition than in the excess condition in a particular situation. The results suggested the possibility that our proposed interactive approach improved recognition performance.","PeriodicalId":119467,"journal":{"name":"2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"31 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2015.7333672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper reports an interactive approach to improve the recognition performance by robots of objects indicated by humans during human-robot interaction. We developed an approach based on two findings in conversations where a human refers to an object, which is confirmed by a robot. First, humans tend to use the same words or gestures as the robot in a phenomenon called alignment. Second, humans tend to decrease the amount of information in their references when the robot uses excess information in its confirmations: in other words, alignment inhibition. These findings lead to the following design; a robot should use enough information without being excessive to identify objects to improve recognition accuracy because humans will eventually use similar information to refer to those objects by alignment. If humans more frequently use the same information to identify objects, the robot can more easily recognize those being indicated by humans. To verify our design, we developed a robotic system to recognize the objects to which humans referred and conducted a control experiment that had 2 × 3 conditions; one factor was the robot's confirmation way and another was the arrangement of the objects. The first factor had two levels to identify objects: enough information and excess information. The second factor had three levels: congestion, two groups, and a sparse set. We measured the recognition accuracy of the objects humans referred to and the amount of information in their references. The success rate of the recognition and information amount was higher in the adequate information condition than in the excess condition in a particular situation. The results suggested the possibility that our proposed interactive approach improved recognition performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过人-机器人对齐改进目标参考识别
本文提出了一种人机交互方法,以提高机器人在人机交互过程中对人指示的物体的识别性能。我们开发了一种方法,基于在对话中的两个发现,在对话中,人类指的是一个物体,这是由机器人确认的。首先,人类倾向于使用与机器人相同的语言或手势,这种现象被称为“对齐”。第二,当机器人在确认中使用多余的信息时,人类倾向于减少参考信息的数量:换句话说,对齐抑制。这些发现导致了以下设计;机器人应该使用足够的信息而不是过多的信息来识别物体,以提高识别精度,因为人类最终会使用类似的信息来通过对齐来引用这些物体。如果人类更频繁地使用相同的信息来识别物体,机器人就能更容易地识别出人类指示的物体。为了验证我们的设计,我们开发了一个机器人系统来识别人类所指的物体,并进行了2 × 3条件的控制实验;一个因素是机器人的确认方式,另一个因素是物体的排列。第一个因素有两个层次来识别对象:足够的信息和多余的信息。第二个因素有三个级别:拥塞、两个组和一个稀疏集。我们测量了人类所参考的物体的识别精度和他们所参考的信息量。在特定情况下,信息充足条件下的识别成功率和信息量均高于信息过剩条件下的识别成功率。结果表明,我们提出的交互方法可能会提高识别性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Joint action perception to enable fluent human-robot teamwork Talking-Ally: What is the future of robot's utterance generation? Robot watchfulness hinders learning performance Floor estimation by a wearable travel aid for visually impaired A survey report on information costs in introducing technology to care services for older adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1