Cases Having a Gleason Score 3+4=7 With <5% of Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostate Needle Biopsy Show Similar Failure-free Survival and Adverse Pathology Prevalence to Gleason Score 6 Cases in a Radical Prostatectomy Cohort

Shun Sato, T. Kimura, T. Yorozu, H. Onuma, K. Iwatani, S. Egawa, M. Ikegami, Hiroyuki Takahashi
{"title":"Cases Having a Gleason Score 3+4=7 With <5% of Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostate Needle Biopsy Show Similar Failure-free Survival and Adverse Pathology Prevalence to Gleason Score 6 Cases in a Radical Prostatectomy Cohort","authors":"Shun Sato, T. Kimura, T. Yorozu, H. Onuma, K. Iwatani, S. Egawa, M. Ikegami, Hiroyuki Takahashi","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000001345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Recent discussions have suggested expanding the inclusion criteria for active prostate cancer surveillance to include cases with a Gleason score (GS) of 3+4=7. In this study, we examined this proposed use of a limited percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) to identify candidates of active surveillance among 315 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with a GS of 6 or 3+4=7 via needle biopsy. The latter cases were divided into 4 groups using highest or overall %GP4 cut-off values of 5% and 10% as determined from prostate needle biopsies. The frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence were compared between the GS 6 and both GS 3+4=7 groups. Adverse pathology was defined as a GS 4+3=7 or higher, pT3b staging or positive lymph node metastasis. Notably, the Gleason pattern 4 <5% and GS 6 groups did not differ significantly in terms of the frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence by the highest method. However, other highest Gleason pattern 4 categories had significantly higher frequencies and risks. Using the overall method, even the Gleason pattern 4 <5% group had a significantly higher frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence relative to the GS 6 group. In conclusion, our findings suggest that patients with a GS 3+4=7 on biopsy with a highest %GP4 <5% are similar candidates for active surveillance to men with GS 6 cancers.","PeriodicalId":275221,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Recent discussions have suggested expanding the inclusion criteria for active prostate cancer surveillance to include cases with a Gleason score (GS) of 3+4=7. In this study, we examined this proposed use of a limited percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) to identify candidates of active surveillance among 315 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with a GS of 6 or 3+4=7 via needle biopsy. The latter cases were divided into 4 groups using highest or overall %GP4 cut-off values of 5% and 10% as determined from prostate needle biopsies. The frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence were compared between the GS 6 and both GS 3+4=7 groups. Adverse pathology was defined as a GS 4+3=7 or higher, pT3b staging or positive lymph node metastasis. Notably, the Gleason pattern 4 <5% and GS 6 groups did not differ significantly in terms of the frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence by the highest method. However, other highest Gleason pattern 4 categories had significantly higher frequencies and risks. Using the overall method, even the Gleason pattern 4 <5% group had a significantly higher frequency of adverse pathology and risk of biochemical recurrence relative to the GS 6 group. In conclusion, our findings suggest that patients with a GS 3+4=7 on biopsy with a highest %GP4 <5% are similar candidates for active surveillance to men with GS 6 cancers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在根治性前列腺切除术队列中,Gleason评分为3+4=7且前列腺针活检中Gleason模式4 <5%的病例显示无失败生存和不良病理发生率与Gleason评分为6的病例相似
补充数字内容可在文本中找到。最近的讨论建议扩大活动期前列腺癌监测的纳入标准,纳入Gleason评分(GS)为3+4=7的病例。在这项研究中,我们研究了使用有限百分比Gleason模式4 (%GP4)在315名接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者中通过针活检确定GS为6或3+4=7的候选主动监测。根据前列腺穿刺活检确定的最高或总体%GP4临界值5%和10%分为4组。比较gs6组与gs3 +4=7组不良病理发生频率及生化复发风险。不良病理定义为GS 4+3=7或更高,pT3b分期或淋巴结转移阳性。值得注意的是,Gleason模式4 <5%和gs6组在最高法的不良病理发生频率和生化复发风险方面无显著差异。然而,其他最高Gleason模式4类别的频率和风险明显更高。综合来看,即使是Gleason模式4 <5%组,其不良病理发生频率和生化复发风险也明显高于gs6组。总之,我们的研究结果表明,活检时gp3 +4=7且GP4 <5%的最高百分比的患者与gp6癌症患者相似,可以进行主动监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Superficial CD34-Positive Fibroblastic Tumor Localized Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma (LMPeM) in Women: A Clinicopathologic Study of 18 Cases Gastroesophageal Glomus Tumors “Malignant Mesenchymoma” Revisited Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Characterization of Sarcomatoid Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1