Feminist imaginings in the face of automation and the “end of work”: De-automating reproduction and reorganizing kinship

María Julieta Massacese
{"title":"Feminist imaginings in the face of automation and the “end of work”: De-automating reproduction and reorganizing kinship","authors":"María Julieta Massacese","doi":"10.46652/resistances.v4i7.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automation is once again raising concerns about the threat it poses to employment. Feminists in the 20th century believed that technology could liberate women from undesirable labor. However, historically, industry and automation have not reduced women’s workloads but have instead favored unpaid work, flexibility, and work overload. Rather than mitigating the care and ecological crises, technological development has exacerbated them. This raises an important question for feminist theory: should technology be rejected as a way of reducing women’s workload? To explore this, we analyze classical and contemporary contributions from feminist theorists on the future of work and technology. Using philosophical and feminist theoretical methods, our aim is to examine the relationships between these imaginings and home, family, design, and consumption. This article argues that a feminist analysis of work must include the technological dimension, considering the production of human beings as a strategic technology for feminist purposes. To imagine an alternative near future, the article draws on Donna Haraway’s making kin, emphasizing defamiliarization and refamiliarization of social and ecological relations, pluralist science, and technology for sustainable regeneration of life; and finally, as suggested in this analysis, the ironic persistence of labour in a post-industrial or post-capitalist era.","PeriodicalId":303053,"journal":{"name":"Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resistances. Journal of the Philosophy of History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46652/resistances.v4i7.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automation is once again raising concerns about the threat it poses to employment. Feminists in the 20th century believed that technology could liberate women from undesirable labor. However, historically, industry and automation have not reduced women’s workloads but have instead favored unpaid work, flexibility, and work overload. Rather than mitigating the care and ecological crises, technological development has exacerbated them. This raises an important question for feminist theory: should technology be rejected as a way of reducing women’s workload? To explore this, we analyze classical and contemporary contributions from feminist theorists on the future of work and technology. Using philosophical and feminist theoretical methods, our aim is to examine the relationships between these imaginings and home, family, design, and consumption. This article argues that a feminist analysis of work must include the technological dimension, considering the production of human beings as a strategic technology for feminist purposes. To imagine an alternative near future, the article draws on Donna Haraway’s making kin, emphasizing defamiliarization and refamiliarization of social and ecological relations, pluralist science, and technology for sustainable regeneration of life; and finally, as suggested in this analysis, the ironic persistence of labour in a post-industrial or post-capitalist era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对自动化和“工作的终结”的女权主义想象:去自动化的再生产和重新组织亲属关系
自动化再次引发了人们对其对就业构成威胁的担忧。20世纪的女权主义者认为,技术可以将女性从不受欢迎的劳动中解放出来。然而,从历史上看,工业和自动化并没有减少女性的工作量,而是青睐无薪工作、灵活性和超负荷的工作。技术的发展不仅没有减轻环境和生态危机,反而加剧了它们。这就为女权主义理论提出了一个重要的问题:作为减少女性工作量的一种方式,技术应该被拒绝吗?为了探讨这一点,我们分析了女性主义理论家对未来工作和技术的古典和当代贡献。运用哲学和女性主义理论方法,我们的目的是研究这些想象与家、家庭、设计和消费之间的关系。本文认为,女性主义对工作的分析必须包括技术维度,将人类的生产视为女性主义目的的战略技术。本文借鉴唐娜·哈拉威的“造亲”思想,展望未来,强调社会与生态关系的陌生化与陌生化,强调生命可持续再生的多元科学与技术;最后,正如本分析所暗示的,在后工业或后资本主义时代,具有讽刺意味的是,劳动力的持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness Enhancing Concentration in English Foreign Language Reading Comprehension A Movie Method Proposal to teach vocabulary for “Nuevo Rocafuerte High School” EFL Students Teaching strategies for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in English as foreign language classrooms Aplicación de la inteligencia artificial en el Derecho Penal: problemas y desafios Falta de disposiciones jurídicas que regulen el aspecto probatorio en materia de tránsito
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1