In dogs diagnosed with osteoarthritis, how safe and effective is long-term treatment with bedinvetmab in providing analgesia?

K. Kronenberger
{"title":"In dogs diagnosed with osteoarthritis, how safe and effective is long-term treatment with bedinvetmab in providing analgesia?","authors":"K. Kronenberger","doi":"10.18849/ve.v8i1.598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PICO question\nIn dogs diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA), how safe is treatment with bedinvetmab, when compared to a placebo and how effective in long-term reduction of the severity of the clinical signs associated with OA-related pain?\n \nClinical bottom line\nCategory of research\nTreatment.\nNumber and type of study designs reviewed\nTwo papers were critically reviewed. One was a randomised, blinded, multi-arm laboratory safety study; the other a multi-center field trial consisting of a block-randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled phase, followed by a non-comparative, open-label case series study.\nStrength of evidence\nWeak.\nOutcomes reported\nOne study rated the reduction of the severity of clinical signs associated with OA pain using owner Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) ratings and non-validated veterinary clinical assessments (VCAs). Safety was addressed by evaluating adverse health effects (AHEs), concentration of antidrug antibodies (ADAs), and clinical pathology. Significant improvements in pain scores and VCAs were reported in this treatment study. The second safety-only study used clinical observation to evaluate AHEs. Both studies reported AHEs.\nConclusion\nA single study suggests that treatment with bedinvetmab is effective. Two studies support the drug having few AHEs. Both studies have significant design limitations preventing the evaluation of bedinvetmab effectiveness. There is weak / inconclusive evidence for long-term efficacy and short-term safety of OA treatment with bedinvetmab. The decision to use bedinvetmab remains dependent on the judgement and experience of the clinician.\nHow to apply this evidence in practice\nThe application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources.\nKnowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.","PeriodicalId":257905,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Evidence","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18849/ve.v8i1.598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PICO question In dogs diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA), how safe is treatment with bedinvetmab, when compared to a placebo and how effective in long-term reduction of the severity of the clinical signs associated with OA-related pain?   Clinical bottom line Category of research Treatment. Number and type of study designs reviewed Two papers were critically reviewed. One was a randomised, blinded, multi-arm laboratory safety study; the other a multi-center field trial consisting of a block-randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled phase, followed by a non-comparative, open-label case series study. Strength of evidence Weak. Outcomes reported One study rated the reduction of the severity of clinical signs associated with OA pain using owner Canine Brief Pain Inventory (CBPI) ratings and non-validated veterinary clinical assessments (VCAs). Safety was addressed by evaluating adverse health effects (AHEs), concentration of antidrug antibodies (ADAs), and clinical pathology. Significant improvements in pain scores and VCAs were reported in this treatment study. The second safety-only study used clinical observation to evaluate AHEs. Both studies reported AHEs. Conclusion A single study suggests that treatment with bedinvetmab is effective. Two studies support the drug having few AHEs. Both studies have significant design limitations preventing the evaluation of bedinvetmab effectiveness. There is weak / inconclusive evidence for long-term efficacy and short-term safety of OA treatment with bedinvetmab. The decision to use bedinvetmab remains dependent on the judgement and experience of the clinician. How to apply this evidence in practice The application of evidence into practice should take into account multiple factors, not limited to: individual clinical expertise, patient’s circumstances and owners’ values, country, location or clinic where you work, the individual case in front of you, the availability of therapies and resources. Knowledge Summaries are a resource to help reinforce or inform decision making. They do not override the responsibility or judgement of the practitioner to do what is best for the animal in their care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在诊断为骨关节炎的狗中,长期使用贝地韦单抗进行镇痛治疗的安全性和有效性如何?
在诊断为骨关节炎(OA)的狗中,与安慰剂相比,贝地韦单抗治疗的安全性如何?在长期降低与OA相关疼痛相关的临床症状的严重程度方面效果如何?临床底线研究类别治疗。审查的研究设计的数量和类型对两篇论文进行了严格审查。一项是随机、盲法、多组实验室安全性研究;另一个是多中心现场试验,包括一个块随机、双盲、安慰剂对照阶段,然后是一个非比较、开放标签的病例系列研究。证据强度:弱。结果报告:一项研究使用犬主简短疼痛量表(CBPI)评分和未经验证的兽医临床评估(VCAs)评估了与OA疼痛相关的临床症状严重程度的降低。安全性通过评估不良健康效应(ahs)、抗药抗体(ADAs)浓度和临床病理来解决。在这项治疗研究中,疼痛评分和vca均有显著改善。第二项仅限安全性的研究采用临床观察来评估ahs。两项研究都报告了ahs。结论一项研究表明贝地韦单抗治疗是有效的。两项研究支持该药的ahs含量很少。两项研究都存在显著的设计局限性,妨碍了对bedinvetmab有效性的评估。bedinvetmab治疗OA的长期疗效和短期安全性的证据薄弱/不确定。使用bedinvetmab的决定仍然取决于临床医生的判断和经验。如何将证据应用于实践应考虑多种因素,不限于:个人临床专业知识、患者的情况和所有者的价值观、您工作的国家、地点或诊所、您面前的个案、治疗方法和资源的可用性。知识摘要是帮助加强或告知决策的资源。他们不会凌驾于从业者的责任或判断之上,去做对他们照顾的动物最好的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Erratum to: Comparing the effectiveness of clomipramine and fluoxetine in dogs with anxiety-related behaviours In dogs with thoracolumbar disc extrusion does the use of acupuncture improve clinical recovery? Effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in cats with chronic gingivostomatitis Effectiveness of mesenchymal stem cell therapy in cats with chronic gingivostomatitis Does local anaesthetic reduce pain in rubber ring castration of neonatal lambs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1