Context and Creativity: William Grant Still in Los Angeles

J. Djedje
{"title":"Context and Creativity: William Grant Still in Los Angeles","authors":"J. Djedje","doi":"10.5406/BLACMUSIRESEJ.31.1.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"William Grant Still (1895-78) is one of the most well-known composers of art music in the United States. Since the mid-i920s, music critics and writers have noted both his talent and creativity. In addition to the numerous awards and commissions he has received, the elaborate manner in which music organizations across the United States celebrated the diamond (1970) and centennial (1995) anniversaries of Still's birth also demonstrates his seminal importance to art music (Spencer 1992; Southern 1997,431). His significance becomes even more apparent each February during Black History Month in the United States, when conductors of major symphony orchestras choose compositions by Still to commemorate the occasion. As an established composer, many publications document his life history; see works written by himself (W. G. Still [1972] 1995); his wife, Verna Arvey (1984); his daughter, Judith Anne Still (J. A. Still [1972] 1995, 2006b); music scholars Jon Michael Spencer (1992), Catherine Parsons Smith (1996,1997, 2000, 2008), Beverly Soil (2005), and Gayle Murchison (2005); and others (see J. A. Still, Dabrishus, and Quin 1996). In addition, histories, articles, dissertations, and other publications on African-American, American, and European art music include discussions of Still (see Southern 1997; Machlis and Forney 2003; de Lerma 2006-7; and ProQuest 2009). Nevertheless, like most celebrated individuals, those who write about them pick and choose their emphases. Much is known about Still's early life, formative years in the South, and musical training and early successes on the East Coast. However, his time in Los Angeles, the place where he permanently settled (in 1934), spent the majority of life, and died (in 1978) at the age of eighty-three, has been only briefly researched, and never as a topic that had a major impact on his development and creativity as a composer. Yet, living in Los Angeles was one of the most fulfilling aspects of Still's life. His comments in a 1967 interview provide insight: STILL: Prior to coming here, I thought that I would only be satisfied living in the East, but after coming here,. .. California did something to me. BROWN: What do you think it was? The [climate] or something else? STILL: I don't know, [but] I think [that] it was something more than that. And I can't tell you what it was. There was just something about this section of the country that seemed to satisfy me, more so than any [other part of the country]. I had never been anywhere [else] that felt like home. When I came here, it was like coming home. Now don't ask me why, because I don't know. But I was perfectly well satisfied here. (Brown 1984,10) Catherine Parsons Smith (1996, 2000,2008) is one of the few scholars to include discussion of Los Angeles when focusing on Still. In fact, Smith's Making Music in Los Angeles: Transforming the Popular (2007) provides an excellent portrayal of Los Angeles's sociocultural and musical environment. However, very little of the work concerns Still because the time period, the Progressive Era (1880-1930), predates Still's relocation to the West Coast. Lack of interest in Los Angeles may be because researchers believe Still's greatest success, the composing and premier performance of the Afro-American Symphony (composed in 1930 and premiered in 1931), occurred before permanently settling in Southern California. Or scant mention of the city could be due to the dismissal of Los Angeles, by many in the music community, as an important harbinger of serious musical and cultural life. On the matter of the city, which some sociologists define as a large, dense, and heterogeneous setting (Eames and Goode 1977), research trends vary. While some music scholars mention place when conducting research on individuals living in urban areas, few elaborate on urbanism (the culture of cities) as a primary issue in their discussion. For example, since 1980, several articles in Ethnomusicology have been concerned with music making in cities, but only a few authors (e. …","PeriodicalId":354930,"journal":{"name":"Black Music Research Journal","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Black Music Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/BLACMUSIRESEJ.31.1.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

William Grant Still (1895-78) is one of the most well-known composers of art music in the United States. Since the mid-i920s, music critics and writers have noted both his talent and creativity. In addition to the numerous awards and commissions he has received, the elaborate manner in which music organizations across the United States celebrated the diamond (1970) and centennial (1995) anniversaries of Still's birth also demonstrates his seminal importance to art music (Spencer 1992; Southern 1997,431). His significance becomes even more apparent each February during Black History Month in the United States, when conductors of major symphony orchestras choose compositions by Still to commemorate the occasion. As an established composer, many publications document his life history; see works written by himself (W. G. Still [1972] 1995); his wife, Verna Arvey (1984); his daughter, Judith Anne Still (J. A. Still [1972] 1995, 2006b); music scholars Jon Michael Spencer (1992), Catherine Parsons Smith (1996,1997, 2000, 2008), Beverly Soil (2005), and Gayle Murchison (2005); and others (see J. A. Still, Dabrishus, and Quin 1996). In addition, histories, articles, dissertations, and other publications on African-American, American, and European art music include discussions of Still (see Southern 1997; Machlis and Forney 2003; de Lerma 2006-7; and ProQuest 2009). Nevertheless, like most celebrated individuals, those who write about them pick and choose their emphases. Much is known about Still's early life, formative years in the South, and musical training and early successes on the East Coast. However, his time in Los Angeles, the place where he permanently settled (in 1934), spent the majority of life, and died (in 1978) at the age of eighty-three, has been only briefly researched, and never as a topic that had a major impact on his development and creativity as a composer. Yet, living in Los Angeles was one of the most fulfilling aspects of Still's life. His comments in a 1967 interview provide insight: STILL: Prior to coming here, I thought that I would only be satisfied living in the East, but after coming here,. .. California did something to me. BROWN: What do you think it was? The [climate] or something else? STILL: I don't know, [but] I think [that] it was something more than that. And I can't tell you what it was. There was just something about this section of the country that seemed to satisfy me, more so than any [other part of the country]. I had never been anywhere [else] that felt like home. When I came here, it was like coming home. Now don't ask me why, because I don't know. But I was perfectly well satisfied here. (Brown 1984,10) Catherine Parsons Smith (1996, 2000,2008) is one of the few scholars to include discussion of Los Angeles when focusing on Still. In fact, Smith's Making Music in Los Angeles: Transforming the Popular (2007) provides an excellent portrayal of Los Angeles's sociocultural and musical environment. However, very little of the work concerns Still because the time period, the Progressive Era (1880-1930), predates Still's relocation to the West Coast. Lack of interest in Los Angeles may be because researchers believe Still's greatest success, the composing and premier performance of the Afro-American Symphony (composed in 1930 and premiered in 1931), occurred before permanently settling in Southern California. Or scant mention of the city could be due to the dismissal of Los Angeles, by many in the music community, as an important harbinger of serious musical and cultural life. On the matter of the city, which some sociologists define as a large, dense, and heterogeneous setting (Eames and Goode 1977), research trends vary. While some music scholars mention place when conducting research on individuals living in urban areas, few elaborate on urbanism (the culture of cities) as a primary issue in their discussion. For example, since 1980, several articles in Ethnomusicology have been concerned with music making in cities, but only a few authors (e. …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景和创造力:威廉·格兰特还在洛杉矶
威廉·格兰特·斯蒂尔(1895-78)是美国最著名的艺术音乐作曲家之一。自20世纪20年代中期以来,音乐评论家和作家都注意到他的才华和创造力。除了他获得的众多奖项和委托外,美国各地的音乐组织以精心设计的方式庆祝斯蒂尔的钻石(1970年)和百年(1995年)诞辰纪念日,也证明了他对艺术音乐的开创性重要性(Spencer 1992;1997年南部,431)。他的重要性在每年2月的美国黑人历史月变得更加明显,当主要交响乐团的指挥们选择斯蒂尔的作品来纪念这一时刻。作为一名知名作曲家,许多出版物记录了他的生活史;参见自己写的作品(W. G. Still [1972] 1995);他的妻子Verna Arvey (1984);他的女儿朱迪思·安妮·斯蒂尔(j.a.斯蒂尔[1972]1995,2006);音乐学者Jon Michael Spencer (1992), Catherine Parsons Smith (1996,1997, 2000, 2008), Beverly Soil(2005)和Gayle Murchison (2005);等(见J. A. Still, Dabrishus, and Quin, 1996)。此外,关于非裔美国人、美国人和欧洲艺术音乐的历史、文章、论文和其他出版物包括Still的讨论(见Southern 1997;Machlis and Forney 2003;de Lerma 2006-7;和ProQuest 2009)。然而,就像大多数名人一样,那些写他们的人会选择重点。关于斯蒂尔的早年生活,他在南方的成长岁月,以及他在东海岸接受的音乐训练和早期的成功,我们知道得很多。然而,他在洛杉矶的时间,他永久定居的地方(1934年),度过了大部分的生活,并于1978年去世(享年83岁),只有简短的研究,从来没有作为一个主题,对他的发展和创造力作为一个作曲家产生重大影响。然而,住在洛杉矶是斯蒂尔生活中最令人满意的方面之一。他在1967年的一次采访中评论说:“在来这里之前,我认为我只会满足于生活在东方,但来到这里之后,……加州对我做了一些事。布朗:你认为是什么?是气候还是别的原因?STILL:我不知道,但我认为不止于此。我不能告诉你那是什么。这个国家的这个部分似乎比其他任何地方都更让我满意。我从来没有到过像家一样的地方。当我来到这里,就像回到了家。别问我为什么,因为我不知道。但我对这里非常满意。(Brown 1984,10)凯瑟琳·帕森斯·史密斯(Catherine Parsons Smith, 1996, 2000,2008)是为数不多的在研究Still时对洛杉矶进行讨论的学者之一。事实上,史密斯的《在洛杉矶制作音乐:改变流行》(2007)很好地描绘了洛杉矶的社会文化和音乐环境。然而,很少有作品涉及斯蒂尔,因为当时的时代是进步时代(1880-1930),早于斯蒂尔搬到西海岸。对洛杉矶缺乏兴趣可能是因为研究人员认为斯蒂尔最大的成功,即创作和首演非裔美国交响乐团(1930年创作,1931年首演),发生在永久定居南加州之前。或者,很少有人提到这座城市,可能是因为音乐界的许多人不认为洛杉矶是严肃音乐和文化生活的重要先驱。一些社会学家将城市定义为一个大的、密集的、异质的环境(Eames and Goode 1977),在城市问题上,研究趋势各不相同。虽然一些音乐学者在研究生活在城市地区的个人时提到了地方,但很少有人在他们的讨论中详细阐述城市主义(城市文化)作为一个主要问题。例如,自1980年以来,《民族音乐学》(Ethnomusicology)上的几篇文章一直关注城市中的音乐制作,但只有少数作者(例如. ...)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ragga Soca Burning the Moral Compass: An Analysis of "Hellfire" Lyrics in the Music of Bunji Garlin Freedom Songs: Helping Black Activists, Black Residents, and White Volunteers Work Together in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, during the Summer of 1964 "Cien porciento tico tico": Reggae, Belonging, and the Afro-Caribbean Ticos of Costa Rica Revisiting the Katanga Guitar Style(s) and Some Other Early African Guitar Idioms Las Tonadas Trinitarias: History of an Afro-Cuban Musical Tradition from Trinidad de Cuba
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1