Assessing the usability of smartwatches for academic cheating during exams

Stephanie Wong, Lillian Yang, B. Riecke, Emily S. Cramer, Carman Neustaedter
{"title":"Assessing the usability of smartwatches for academic cheating during exams","authors":"Stephanie Wong, Lillian Yang, B. Riecke, Emily S. Cramer, Carman Neustaedter","doi":"10.1145/3098279.3098568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smartwatches are growing in usage, yet they come with the additional challenge of regulating their usage during the taking of academic tests. However, it is unclear how effective they are at actually allowing students to cheat. We conducted an experiment that examines the use of smartwatches for cheating on Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ) and Short Answers (SA) with either Pictures/Text shown on the watch to aid students. Our results indicate that smartwatches are neither efficient nor have a high usability rating for cheating. However, students are able to score higher on Multiple-Choice Questions compared to Short Answers. We use the cheating paradigm as an example to understand the perceived usability and appropriation of smartwatches in an academic setting. We provide suggestions that help to deter cheating in an academic setting. Our study contributes to the research on academic integrity and the growing demand of wearable technologies.","PeriodicalId":120153,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3098279.3098568","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Smartwatches are growing in usage, yet they come with the additional challenge of regulating their usage during the taking of academic tests. However, it is unclear how effective they are at actually allowing students to cheat. We conducted an experiment that examines the use of smartwatches for cheating on Multiple-Choice Questions (MCQ) and Short Answers (SA) with either Pictures/Text shown on the watch to aid students. Our results indicate that smartwatches are neither efficient nor have a high usability rating for cheating. However, students are able to score higher on Multiple-Choice Questions compared to Short Answers. We use the cheating paradigm as an example to understand the perceived usability and appropriation of smartwatches in an academic setting. We provide suggestions that help to deter cheating in an academic setting. Our study contributes to the research on academic integrity and the growing demand of wearable technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估智能手表在考试中作弊的可用性
智能手表的使用越来越多,但它们也带来了额外的挑战,即在参加学术考试时如何规范它们的使用。然而,目前还不清楚他们在允许学生作弊方面的效果如何。我们进行了一项实验,检查智能手表在多项选择题(MCQ)和简答题(SA)中作弊的使用情况,手表上显示图片或文字来帮助学生。我们的研究结果表明,智能手表在欺骗方面既不高效,也没有很高的可用性评级。然而,与简答题相比,学生在选择题上的得分更高。我们以作弊范例为例来理解智能手表在学术环境中的感知可用性和挪用。我们提供的建议有助于防止在学术环境中作弊。我们的研究有助于学术诚信研究和可穿戴技术日益增长的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving pocket paint usability via material design compliance and internationalization & localization support on application level CapSoles: who is walking on what kind of floor? Exploring the feasibility of subliminal priming on smartphones Visual, auditory and haptic navigation feedbacks among older pedestrians Usability of different types of commercial selfie sticks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1