Testimony and grammatical evidentials

Peter Elswyk
{"title":"Testimony and grammatical evidentials","authors":"Peter Elswyk","doi":"10.4324/9781315717937-14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Testimony is typically offered with the use of a declarative sentence. But declaratives differ from one language to the next. Does testimonial practice differ cross-linguistically too? This chapter discusses grammatical evidentials to illustrate that it does. My illustration of the significance of evidentials to the epistemology of testimony has a negative and a positive part. For the negative part, it is argued that some definitions of testimony are mistaken because they do not apply to testimony offered by a declarative containing an evidential. The positive component discusses a new puzzle presented by McCready (2015) that evidentials raise about the justificatory status of testimony-based beliefs.","PeriodicalId":438715,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717937-14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Testimony is typically offered with the use of a declarative sentence. But declaratives differ from one language to the next. Does testimonial practice differ cross-linguistically too? This chapter discusses grammatical evidentials to illustrate that it does. My illustration of the significance of evidentials to the epistemology of testimony has a negative and a positive part. For the negative part, it is argued that some definitions of testimony are mistaken because they do not apply to testimony offered by a declarative containing an evidential. The positive component discusses a new puzzle presented by McCready (2015) that evidentials raise about the justificatory status of testimony-based beliefs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
证词和语法证据
证词通常使用陈述句。但是声明语在不同的语言中是不同的。证明实践在不同语言之间也不同吗?这一章讨论语法证据来说明它的存在。我对证据对证言认识论的重要性的说明,分为否定部分和肯定部分。对于否定部分,有人认为某些证词的定义是错误的,因为它们不适用于包含证据的陈述所提供的证词。积极部分讨论了McCready(2015)提出的一个新难题,即证据提出了基于证词的信念的正当地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Naturalized Turn in Epistemology Race and Gender and Epistemologies of Ignorance The Epistemic Role of Science and Expertise in Liberal Democracy Epistemology and Climate Change Epistemic Proceduralism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1