Influence of Matrix Material on Impact Properties of Chopped Carbon Fiber-Thermoplastic Composites Made Using FDM/FFF

A. Patterson, S. Hasanov, Bhaskar Vajipeyajula
{"title":"Influence of Matrix Material on Impact Properties of Chopped Carbon Fiber-Thermoplastic Composites Made Using FDM/FFF","authors":"A. Patterson, S. Hasanov, Bhaskar Vajipeyajula","doi":"10.1115/iam2022-88941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A major applications of thermoplastic additive manufacturing (typically completed using the fused deposition modeling or fused filament fabrication (FDM/FFF) process) is in the production of polymer matrix composites. Several different reinforcing materials have been proposed and studied, a common one of which is chopped carbon fibers (CCF). Most of the published research on the properties and effect of the CCF reinforcement has relied upon a poly(lactic acid) (PLA) matrix, as it has a low and stable melting temperature, low cost, and mixes readily with particulate or chopped reinforcing materials. For commercially available CCF filament for FDM/FFF, the typical fiber content is around 15–25% by volume, with the remainder being the thermoplastic matrix. To better explore the influence of the matrix material on the properties of these materials, this study compares the IZOD impact properties of standard CCF PLA with CCF-reinforced materials using polyamide/nylon (PA), polycarbonate (PC), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) matrices. All cases were printed at full (100%) density. For each material, samples of 5 mm thickness were tested in the Type A (notch in tension) and Type E (notch in compression) configurations. Two print orientations (flat and horizontal) and two raster angles (0–90° and ±45°) were considered for each combination. As required by ASTM D256, the tests were replicated five times each. The results are compared with the major literature for CCF reinforced PLA, as well as benchmark tests using injection molded samples and non-CCF PLA, PA, PC, ABS, and PETG processed by FDM/FFF.","PeriodicalId":184278,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Additive Manufacturing Conference","volume":"189 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Additive Manufacturing Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/iam2022-88941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A major applications of thermoplastic additive manufacturing (typically completed using the fused deposition modeling or fused filament fabrication (FDM/FFF) process) is in the production of polymer matrix composites. Several different reinforcing materials have been proposed and studied, a common one of which is chopped carbon fibers (CCF). Most of the published research on the properties and effect of the CCF reinforcement has relied upon a poly(lactic acid) (PLA) matrix, as it has a low and stable melting temperature, low cost, and mixes readily with particulate or chopped reinforcing materials. For commercially available CCF filament for FDM/FFF, the typical fiber content is around 15–25% by volume, with the remainder being the thermoplastic matrix. To better explore the influence of the matrix material on the properties of these materials, this study compares the IZOD impact properties of standard CCF PLA with CCF-reinforced materials using polyamide/nylon (PA), polycarbonate (PC), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) matrices. All cases were printed at full (100%) density. For each material, samples of 5 mm thickness were tested in the Type A (notch in tension) and Type E (notch in compression) configurations. Two print orientations (flat and horizontal) and two raster angles (0–90° and ±45°) were considered for each combination. As required by ASTM D256, the tests were replicated five times each. The results are compared with the major literature for CCF reinforced PLA, as well as benchmark tests using injection molded samples and non-CCF PLA, PA, PC, ABS, and PETG processed by FDM/FFF.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基体材料对FDM/FFF短切碳纤维-热塑性复合材料冲击性能的影响
热塑性增材制造(通常使用熔融沉积建模或熔融长丝制造(FDM/FFF)工艺完成)的主要应用是生产聚合物基复合材料。人们提出并研究了几种不同的增强材料,其中常用的一种是短切碳纤维(CCF)。大多数已发表的关于CCF增强材料性能和效果的研究都依赖于聚乳酸(PLA)基体,因为它具有低而稳定的熔融温度,低成本,并且易于与颗粒状或切碎的增强材料混合。对于用于FDM/FFF的商用CCF长丝,典型的纤维含量约为15-25%(按体积计),其余为热塑性基体。为了更好地探索基体材料对这些材料性能的影响,本研究比较了标准CCF PLA与使用聚酰胺/尼龙(PA)、聚碳酸酯(PC)、丙烯腈-丁二烯-苯乙烯(ABS)和聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯(PETG)基体的CCF增强材料的IZOD冲击性能。所有的箱子都以100%的密度印刷。对于每种材料,在A型(张力缺口)和E型(压缩缺口)配置下测试了5mm厚度的样品。每种组合都考虑了两个打印方向(平面和水平)和两个光栅角度(0-90°和±45°)。按照ASTM D256的要求,每个试验重复5次。结果与CCF增强PLA的主要文献进行了比较,以及使用注塑样品和非CCF PLA、PA、PC、ABS和经FDM/FFF处理的PETG进行基准测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thermal Stability of Additively Manufactured Mar M 509 Temperature Field Monitoring in Fused Filament Fabrication Process Based on Physics-Constrained Dictionary Learning Food Contact Materials: An Analysis of Water Absorption in Nylon 12 3D Printed Parts Using SLS After VaporFuse Surface Treatment Development of Adaptive Toolpaths for Repair and Cladding of Complex 3D Components by Laser Metal Deposition Data-Driven Model Predictive Control for Roll-to-Roll Process Register Error
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1