[Fresh gas flow and artificial respiration in anesthesia. Technical requirements for the adequate use of rebreathing systems].

J Baum, G Sachs
{"title":"[Fresh gas flow and artificial respiration in anesthesia. Technical requirements for the adequate use of rebreathing systems].","authors":"J Baum,&nbsp;G Sachs","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The majority of modern anaesthetic machines is designed for the rebreathing method. But frequently high fresh gas flows are employed, thus minimising the rebreathing fraction of expiratory gases. However, only by reducing the fresh gas flow substantially, the advantages of the rebreathing technique can be obtained. To evaluate the practicability of flow reduction, minimal flow anaesthesia was carried out with four different anaesthetic machines: AV 1 (Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck), ELSA (Gambro Engström AB, Bromma, Sweden), SULLA 808 V (Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck) und VIVOLEC (Hoyer Medizintechnik, Bremen). Fresh gas flow was reduced to 0.5 l/min after an initial phase of 15-20 min, during which the fresh gas flow was kept at a high level of 4.4 l/min. The minute volumes before and after fresh gas flow reduction were compared. The minute volume decreased markedly and significantly in the SULLA 808 group, whereas it remained nearly unchanged in the AV 1, the ELSA, and the VIVOLEC groups. The differences result from different modes of fresh gas delivery into the breathing circuit. If anaesthetic apparatus that maintain their tidal volume with different fresh gas flow rates are employed, rebreathing systems may be used judiciously by changing the fresh gas flow according to the individual uptake or any particular clinical requirement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7813,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","volume":"25 1","pages":"72-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of modern anaesthetic machines is designed for the rebreathing method. But frequently high fresh gas flows are employed, thus minimising the rebreathing fraction of expiratory gases. However, only by reducing the fresh gas flow substantially, the advantages of the rebreathing technique can be obtained. To evaluate the practicability of flow reduction, minimal flow anaesthesia was carried out with four different anaesthetic machines: AV 1 (Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck), ELSA (Gambro Engström AB, Bromma, Sweden), SULLA 808 V (Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck) und VIVOLEC (Hoyer Medizintechnik, Bremen). Fresh gas flow was reduced to 0.5 l/min after an initial phase of 15-20 min, during which the fresh gas flow was kept at a high level of 4.4 l/min. The minute volumes before and after fresh gas flow reduction were compared. The minute volume decreased markedly and significantly in the SULLA 808 group, whereas it remained nearly unchanged in the AV 1, the ELSA, and the VIVOLEC groups. The differences result from different modes of fresh gas delivery into the breathing circuit. If anaesthetic apparatus that maintain their tidal volume with different fresh gas flow rates are employed, rebreathing systems may be used judiciously by changing the fresh gas flow according to the individual uptake or any particular clinical requirement.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麻醉中的新鲜气流和人工呼吸。充分使用再呼吸系统的技术要求]。
大多数现代麻醉机都是为再呼吸法设计的。但通常采用高新鲜气体流量,从而尽量减少呼气气体的再呼吸部分。然而,只有大幅度减少新鲜气体流量,才能获得再呼吸技术的优点。为了评估流量减少的实用性,使用四种不同的麻醉机进行最小流量麻醉:AV 1 (Drägerwerk AG, l beck), ELSA (Gambro Engström AB,瑞典Bromma), SULLA 808 V (Drägerwerk AG, l beck)和VIVOLEC (Hoyer Medizintechnik,不来梅)。初始阶段15-20 min后,新鲜气体流量降至0.5 l/min,在此期间新鲜气体流量保持在4.4 l/min的高位。比较了新鲜气体减少前后的分钟体积。sula 808组的分钟体积明显下降,而av1、ELSA和VIVOLEC组的分钟体积几乎保持不变。这种差异是由于新鲜气体进入呼吸回路的方式不同造成的。如果使用的麻醉装置以不同的新鲜气体流速保持其潮汐量,则可根据个人摄取或任何特定的临床要求,明智地通过改变新鲜气体流量来使用再呼吸系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The measurement of extravascular lung water--significant in the follow-up of ARDS?]. [Fat emulsions in parenteral feeding following liver transplantation. I. Effect on the recovery of RES function in the transplant]. [The effect of selective decontamination on nosocomial infections, their causative agents and antibiotic resistance in long-term intubated intensive care patients]. [Hypothermia and polytrauma. A case report (28 degrees C)]. [The present situation and developing trends in intensive medicine].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1