[Nalbuphine as compared with pethidine for postoperative pain therapy].

G Mitterschiffthaler, A Theiner, C Wieser, T J Luger, R F Morawetz
{"title":"[Nalbuphine as compared with pethidine for postoperative pain therapy].","authors":"G Mitterschiffthaler,&nbsp;A Theiner,&nbsp;C Wieser,&nbsp;T J Luger,&nbsp;R F Morawetz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nalbuphine is a new partly agonistic antagonistic opioid, that may offer some advantages especially in postoperative pain relief. We compared meperidine (1 mg kg-1) in 100 patients and nalbuphine (0.3 mg kg-1) in 70 patients, administering both agents intravenously after gynaecological operations. Standardised halothane anaesthesia without any opioid was used. After arrival in the recovery room, vigilance (sedation), quality and duration of pain relief were measured by different methods at four different times (0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes). Sedation was significantly more pronounced in the nalbuphine group, but no difference could be found in pain relief and duration between both groups. 6 patients of the n-group showed a short lasting wake-up reaction due to receptor antagonism. 36 patients had to be reinjected at the end of the first hour. We consider nalbuphine to be a safe opioid, however, the marked sedation should be taken into account.</p>","PeriodicalId":7813,"journal":{"name":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","volume":"25 Suppl 1 ","pages":"39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anasthesie, Intensivtherapie, Notfallmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nalbuphine is a new partly agonistic antagonistic opioid, that may offer some advantages especially in postoperative pain relief. We compared meperidine (1 mg kg-1) in 100 patients and nalbuphine (0.3 mg kg-1) in 70 patients, administering both agents intravenously after gynaecological operations. Standardised halothane anaesthesia without any opioid was used. After arrival in the recovery room, vigilance (sedation), quality and duration of pain relief were measured by different methods at four different times (0, 15, 30, and 60 minutes). Sedation was significantly more pronounced in the nalbuphine group, but no difference could be found in pain relief and duration between both groups. 6 patients of the n-group showed a short lasting wake-up reaction due to receptor antagonism. 36 patients had to be reinjected at the end of the first hour. We consider nalbuphine to be a safe opioid, however, the marked sedation should be taken into account.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[纳布啡与哌替啶用于术后疼痛治疗的比较]。
纳布啡是一种新型的部分激动性拮抗阿片类药物,尤其在术后镇痛方面具有一定的优势。我们比较了100例患者的哌替啶(1mg kg-1)和70例患者的纳布啡(0.3 mg kg-1),在妇科手术后静脉注射这两种药物。采用不含阿片类药物的标准化氟烷麻醉。到达恢复室后,分别在0、15、30、60分钟4个不同时间用不同方法测量警觉性(镇静)、镇痛质量和镇痛持续时间。镇静作用在纳布啡组明显更明显,但在疼痛缓解和持续时间上两组无差异。n组6例患者因受体拮抗而出现短暂持续的觉醒反应。36名患者必须在第一个小时结束时重新注射。我们认为纳布啡是一种安全的阿片类药物,然而,应该考虑到明显的镇静作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[The measurement of extravascular lung water--significant in the follow-up of ARDS?]. [Fat emulsions in parenteral feeding following liver transplantation. I. Effect on the recovery of RES function in the transplant]. [The effect of selective decontamination on nosocomial infections, their causative agents and antibiotic resistance in long-term intubated intensive care patients]. [Hypothermia and polytrauma. A case report (28 degrees C)]. [The present situation and developing trends in intensive medicine].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1