Pain After Outpatient Surgical Procedures.

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Deutsches Arzteblatt international Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0235
Philipp Baumbach, Johannes Dreiling, Christin Arnold, Claudia Weinmann, Marcus Komann, Klaus Bäcker, Axel Neumann, Jörg Karst, Winfried Meißner
{"title":"Pain After Outpatient Surgical Procedures.","authors":"Philipp Baumbach, Johannes Dreiling, Christin Arnold, Claudia Weinmann, Marcus Komann, Klaus Bäcker, Axel Neumann, Jörg Karst, Winfried Meißner","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 8.1 million outpatient surgical procedures were performed in Germany in 2021. Little is known about the quality of postoperative pain treatment in the outpatient sector.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The AQS1 project comprises a combined survey of patients and staff in the framework of quality control for ambulatory surgery. The primary endpoint of this study was the prevalence of relevant incisional pain (≥ 4/10 on the numerical rating scale) up to postoperative day 3. Secondary endpoints included prognostic variables for pain and pain-associated outcomes, based on the AQS1 patient questionnaire. Moreover, mixed regression models were used to analyze potential prognostic variables and associations of pain with other outcomes (study registration number DRKS00028052).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 330 008 patients were evaluated (from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2021). The overall prevalence of relevant incisional pain up to postoperative day 3 was 22.5%, with major differences between different types of procedure (3.2%-51.2%). Pain was most common after hemorrhoid surgery (51.2%) and the laparoscopic lysis of large and small bowel adhesions (45.4%). The main associations of relevant pain were with younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [1.82; 1.91]), early postoperative pain (1.34, [1.30; 1.39]), inadequate provision of analgesics (2.90, [2.71; 3.09]), and surgical wound infections (2.60, [2.43; 2.78]). Patients with pain reported lower overall satisfaction with the procedure and a longer inability to work.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data have not been tested for representativeness. They can serve as a point of departure for the optimization of individualized perioperative pain therapy and for the planning of prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11002442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 8.1 million outpatient surgical procedures were performed in Germany in 2021. Little is known about the quality of postoperative pain treatment in the outpatient sector.

Methods: The AQS1 project comprises a combined survey of patients and staff in the framework of quality control for ambulatory surgery. The primary endpoint of this study was the prevalence of relevant incisional pain (≥ 4/10 on the numerical rating scale) up to postoperative day 3. Secondary endpoints included prognostic variables for pain and pain-associated outcomes, based on the AQS1 patient questionnaire. Moreover, mixed regression models were used to analyze potential prognostic variables and associations of pain with other outcomes (study registration number DRKS00028052).

Results: Data from 330 008 patients were evaluated (from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2021). The overall prevalence of relevant incisional pain up to postoperative day 3 was 22.5%, with major differences between different types of procedure (3.2%-51.2%). Pain was most common after hemorrhoid surgery (51.2%) and the laparoscopic lysis of large and small bowel adhesions (45.4%). The main associations of relevant pain were with younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [1.82; 1.91]), early postoperative pain (1.34, [1.30; 1.39]), inadequate provision of analgesics (2.90, [2.71; 3.09]), and surgical wound infections (2.60, [2.43; 2.78]). Patients with pain reported lower overall satisfaction with the procedure and a longer inability to work.

Conclusion: These data have not been tested for representativeness. They can serve as a point of departure for the optimization of individualized perioperative pain therapy and for the planning of prospective studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊手术后疼痛相关结果的评估。
背景:2021年,德国进行了大约810万例门诊外科手术。我们对门诊部门术后疼痛治疗的质量知之甚少。方法:在门诊外科质量控制框架下,对患者和工作人员进行综合调查。本研究的主要终点是术后第3天相关切口疼痛的发生率(数值评定量表≥4/10)。次要终点包括基于AQS1患者问卷的疼痛和疼痛相关结局的预后变量。此外,混合回归模型用于分析潜在的预后变量以及疼痛与其他结果的关联(研究注册号DRKS00028052)。结果:评估了330008例患者的数据(从2001年7月1日至2021年12月31日)。到术后第3天,相关切口疼痛的总体发生率为22.5%,不同手术类型之间差异较大(3.2%-51.2%)。痔疮手术后最常见的是疼痛(51.2%),腹腔镜下大小肠粘连溶解(45.4%)。相关性疼痛的主要相关性与年龄有关(优势比[OR] 1.87, 95%可信区间[1.82;1.91]),术后早期疼痛(1.34,[1.30;1.39]),镇痛药供应不足(2.90,[2.71;3.09]),手术伤口感染(2.60,[2.43;2.78])。疼痛患者对手术的总体满意度较低,无法工作的时间较长。结论:这些数据没有经过代表性检验。它们可以作为优化个体化围手术期疼痛治疗和规划前瞻性研究的出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
期刊最新文献
The Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. Dengue Fever—Diagnosis, Risk Stratification, and Treatment. Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Management. Interrupted Time Series for Assessing the Causality of Intervention Effects. Part 35 of a Series on Evaluating Scientific Publications. The Incidence and Risk Factors of Persistent Opioid Use After Surgery—a Retrospective Secondary Data Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1