EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for pancreatic cancer (ERAP): An observational open-label pilot study.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Endoscopic Ultrasound Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-23 DOI:10.1097/eus.0000000000000003
Pradermchai Kongkam, Kasenee Tiankanon, Dong Wan Seo, Thanawat Luangsukrerk, Virote Sriuranpong, Chonnipa Nantavithya, Trirat Jantarattana, Arlyn Cañones, Stephen J Kerr, Kittithat Tantitanawat, Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon, Wiriyaporn Ridtitid, Pinit Kullavanijaya, Rungsun Rerknimitr
{"title":"<i>E</i>US-guided <i>r</i>adiofrequency <i>a</i>blation plus chemotherapy <i>versus</i> chemotherapy alone for <i>p</i>ancreatic cancer (ERAP): An observational open-label pilot study.","authors":"Pradermchai Kongkam, Kasenee Tiankanon, Dong Wan Seo, Thanawat Luangsukrerk, Virote Sriuranpong, Chonnipa Nantavithya, Trirat Jantarattana, Arlyn Cañones, Stephen J Kerr, Kittithat Tantitanawat, Phonthep Angsuwatcharakon, Wiriyaporn Ridtitid, Pinit Kullavanijaya, Rungsun Rerknimitr","doi":"10.1097/eus.0000000000000003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No study has compared EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) plus systemic chemotherapy (CMT) with CMT alone for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study compared the results of treatment in patients receiving EUS-RFA plus concomitant CMT (group A; <i>n</i> = 14) with those receiving CMT (group B; <i>n</i> = 14) as a pilot study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From July 2017 to August 2018, 4 and 2 patients from groups A and B, respectively, withdrew from the study because of progression of the disease. In total, 10 and 12 patients from groups A and B, respectively, completed the study. All 30 EUS-RFA procedures were successful. Mean maximal tumor diameter before treatment of group A (<i>n</i> = 10) <i>versus</i> B (<i>n</i> = 12) was 62.2 ± 21.0 <i>versus</i> 50.5 ± 22.0 mm, respectively (<i>P</i> = not significant). After treatment, no statistically significant difference in mean maximal tumor diameter was found between both groups. However, in group B, mean maximal tumor diameter was significantly increased from 50.5 ± 22.0 to 56.3 ± 18.7 mm, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.017). Tumor necrosis occurred in group A <i>versus</i> B at 10 of 10 (100%) <i>versus</i> 6 of 12 (50%) patients, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.014). After treatment, group A patients could reduce the mean narcotic pain drug dosage at 26.5 mg of morphine equivalent per day (from 63.6 to 37.1 mg, <i>P</i> = 0.022), whereas group B patients could not reduce the dosage of pain-controlled medication. No statistically significant difference in 6-month mortality rate was found. In group A, 1 procedure-related nonsevere adverse event (<i>n</i> = 1 of 30 [3.3%]) occurred in 1 patient (<i>n</i> = 1 of 14 [7.1%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, the mean tumor diameter of group B was significantly increased after the treatment. Group A had a significantly higher rate of necrosis of tumor and required less narcotic.</p>","PeriodicalId":11577,"journal":{"name":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","volume":"12 5","pages":"402-408"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10631592/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoscopic Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/eus.0000000000000003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: No study has compared EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) plus systemic chemotherapy (CMT) with CMT alone for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Methods: This study compared the results of treatment in patients receiving EUS-RFA plus concomitant CMT (group A; n = 14) with those receiving CMT (group B; n = 14) as a pilot study.

Results: From July 2017 to August 2018, 4 and 2 patients from groups A and B, respectively, withdrew from the study because of progression of the disease. In total, 10 and 12 patients from groups A and B, respectively, completed the study. All 30 EUS-RFA procedures were successful. Mean maximal tumor diameter before treatment of group A (n = 10) versus B (n = 12) was 62.2 ± 21.0 versus 50.5 ± 22.0 mm, respectively (P = not significant). After treatment, no statistically significant difference in mean maximal tumor diameter was found between both groups. However, in group B, mean maximal tumor diameter was significantly increased from 50.5 ± 22.0 to 56.3 ± 18.7 mm, respectively (P = 0.017). Tumor necrosis occurred in group A versus B at 10 of 10 (100%) versus 6 of 12 (50%) patients, respectively (P = 0.014). After treatment, group A patients could reduce the mean narcotic pain drug dosage at 26.5 mg of morphine equivalent per day (from 63.6 to 37.1 mg, P = 0.022), whereas group B patients could not reduce the dosage of pain-controlled medication. No statistically significant difference in 6-month mortality rate was found. In group A, 1 procedure-related nonsevere adverse event (n = 1 of 30 [3.3%]) occurred in 1 patient (n = 1 of 14 [7.1%]).

Conclusions: In this study, the mean tumor diameter of group B was significantly increased after the treatment. Group A had a significantly higher rate of necrosis of tumor and required less narcotic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
eus引导下射频消融加化疗与单独化疗治疗胰腺癌(ERAP):一项观察性开放标签先导研究。
背景:没有研究比较eus引导下射频消融(EUS-RFA)加全身化疗(CMT)与单独CMT治疗不可切除的胰腺导管腺癌。方法:本研究比较了EUS-RFA合并CMT患者的治疗结果(A组;n = 14)与接受CMT组(B组;N = 14)作为初步研究。结果:2017年7月至2018年8月,A组和B组分别有4例和2例患者因病情进展退出研究。A组和B组分别有10名和12名患者完成了研究。30例EUS-RFA手术均成功。A组(n = 10)和B组(n = 12)治疗前最大肿瘤直径均值分别为62.2±21.0 mm和50.5±22.0 mm (P =无统计学意义)。治疗后,两组患者平均最大肿瘤直径比较,差异无统计学意义。B组平均最大肿瘤直径由50.5±22.0 mm增加至56.3±18.7 mm,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.017)。A组和B组的肿瘤坏死发生率分别为10 / 10(100%)和6 / 12 (50%)(P = 0.014)。治疗后,A组患者可减少麻醉镇痛药物的平均剂量,吗啡当量为26.5 mg / d(由63.6 mg减至37.1 mg, P = 0.022),而B组患者无法减少镇痛药物的剂量。6个月死亡率差异无统计学意义。在A组,1例患者(14例患者中1例[7.1%])发生1例与手术相关的非严重不良事件(30例中n = 1例[3.3%])。结论:在本研究中,B组患者治疗后平均肿瘤直径明显增大。A组肿瘤坏死率明显高于对照组,麻醉需要量明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Endoscopic Ultrasound
Endoscopic Ultrasound GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
144
期刊介绍: Endoscopic Ultrasound, a publication of Euro-EUS Scientific Committee, Asia-Pacific EUS Task Force and Latin American Chapter of EUS, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Quarterly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.eusjournal.com. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal does not charge for submission, processing or publication of manuscripts and even for color reproduction of photographs.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic efficacy of cytologic smear and pathologic histology in the differential diagnosis of distal biliary stricture via EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. A suspected case of hepatic reactive lymphoid hyperplasia in which EUS-fine needle aspiration contributed to the diagnosis. Adequacy of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy for next-generation sequencing in pancreatic malignancies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A prospective comparative trial to determine the optimal number of EUS-guided fineneedle passes for successful organoid creation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Deep learning segmentation architectures for automatic detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy samples based on whole-slide imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1