Safety of Plasmapheresis in Donors with Low IgG Levels: Results of a Prospective, Controlled Multicentre Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy Pub Date : 2022-04-14 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1159/000522528
Rainer Moog, Teija Laitinen, Uwe Taborski
{"title":"Safety of Plasmapheresis in Donors with Low IgG Levels: Results of a Prospective, Controlled Multicentre Study.","authors":"Rainer Moog, Teija Laitinen, Uwe Taborski","doi":"10.1159/000522528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although plasmapheresis is generally considered safe, there are still concerns about the long-term effects of plasma donation on immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels. The aim of the present study was to investigate if there is a need to permanently defer donors who donated three times with an IgG level below 6.0 g/L.</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>From September 2007 to December 2017, adverse events (AEs) including infections were analysed from data of a prospective, controlled multicentre study of healthy volunteer donors, participating in an individualized plasmapheresis programme stratified by initial IgG level and body weight (individualized arm) or in standard plasmapheresis according to national guidelines (control arm). IgG was monitored at every fifth donation, and donors with IgG levels below the threshold were identified and followed up for possible AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 97,540 donations in 1,462 donors in the control arm and 1,491,223 donations in 14,281 donors in the individualized arm were included. Donation-based incidences of at least severe AEs and any infections were 0.019% and 0.192% in the control arm, and 0.014% and 0.153% in the individualized arm. Three or more IgG-measurements below the threshold occurred in 38.2% of control arm donors and 20.9% of individualized arm donors. There were no increased incidence rates of at least severe AEs or any infections in donors with ≥3 IgG-measurements below the threshold in either donor's arm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data show no signs of compromised donor safety in donors with ≥3 IgG-measurements below the threshold, indicating that plasmapheresis is feasible and safe in these donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23252,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","volume":"49 5","pages":"271-279"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642530/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000522528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and objectives: Although plasmapheresis is generally considered safe, there are still concerns about the long-term effects of plasma donation on immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels. The aim of the present study was to investigate if there is a need to permanently defer donors who donated three times with an IgG level below 6.0 g/L.

Study design and methods: From September 2007 to December 2017, adverse events (AEs) including infections were analysed from data of a prospective, controlled multicentre study of healthy volunteer donors, participating in an individualized plasmapheresis programme stratified by initial IgG level and body weight (individualized arm) or in standard plasmapheresis according to national guidelines (control arm). IgG was monitored at every fifth donation, and donors with IgG levels below the threshold were identified and followed up for possible AEs.

Results: In total, 97,540 donations in 1,462 donors in the control arm and 1,491,223 donations in 14,281 donors in the individualized arm were included. Donation-based incidences of at least severe AEs and any infections were 0.019% and 0.192% in the control arm, and 0.014% and 0.153% in the individualized arm. Three or more IgG-measurements below the threshold occurred in 38.2% of control arm donors and 20.9% of individualized arm donors. There were no increased incidence rates of at least severe AEs or any infections in donors with ≥3 IgG-measurements below the threshold in either donor's arm.

Conclusions: Our data show no signs of compromised donor safety in donors with ≥3 IgG-measurements below the threshold, indicating that plasmapheresis is feasible and safe in these donors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血浆置换在低IgG水平供者中的安全性:一项前瞻性、对照多中心研究的结果。
背景和目的:虽然血浆置换通常被认为是安全的,但人们仍然担心血浆捐献对免疫球蛋白G (IgG)水平的长期影响。本研究的目的是调查是否需要永久推迟三次献血且IgG水平低于6.0 g/L的献血者。研究设计和方法:从2007年9月至2017年12月,对一项前瞻性、对照的多中心研究的数据进行了包括感染在内的不良事件(ae)分析,这些数据来自健康志愿献血者,他们参加了按初始IgG水平和体重分层的个体化血浆置换计划(个体化组),或根据国家指南进行标准血浆置换(对照组)。每五次献血时监测IgG,并对IgG水平低于阈值的献血者进行识别和随访,以确定可能的不良反应。结果:共纳入对照组1462名献血者的97540例献血者,个体化组14281名献血者的1491223例献血者。基于捐献的至少严重ae和任何感染的发生率在对照组为0.019%和0.192%,在个体化组为0.014%和0.153%。38.2%的对照臂供者和20.9%的个体化臂供者出现三次或三次以上低于阈值的igg检测。至少严重不良反应或任何感染的发生率在供者≥3个igg低于阈值时均未增加。结论:我们的数据显示,在igg≥3低于阈值的供者中,没有迹象表明供者安全性受到损害,这表明血浆置换在这些供者中是可行和安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal is devoted to all areas of transfusion medicine. These include the quality and security of blood products, therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives, transfusion-related questions in transplantation, stem cell manipulation, therapeutic and diagnostic problems of homeostasis, immuno-hematological investigations, and legal aspects of the production of blood products as well as hemotherapy. Both comprehensive reviews and primary publications that detail the newest work in transfusion medicine and hemotherapy promote the international exchange of knowledge within these disciplines. Consistent with this goal, continuing clinical education is also specifically addressed.
期刊最新文献
Erratum. Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Challenges in Diagnosis and Therapy. Classical Haematology: Dynamic Development at the Interface of Transfusion Medicine and Haematology. Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria, Pathophysiology, Diagnostics, and Treatment. Sickle Cell Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1