Coronavirus disease and home recovery: a Singapore perspective.

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Pub Date : 2023-09-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5365/wpsar.2023.14.5.1003
Hwee Yong Trevor Tan, Joachim Wen Kien Yau, Matthias Paul Han Sim Toh, Shawn Vasoo, Yee Sin Leo
{"title":"Coronavirus disease and home recovery: a Singapore perspective.","authors":"Hwee Yong Trevor Tan, Joachim Wen Kien Yau, Matthias Paul Han Sim Toh, Shawn Vasoo, Yee Sin Leo","doi":"10.5365/wpsar.2023.14.5.1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>At the beginning of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Singapore, the strategy initially involved aggressive ring-fencing of infections, before pivoting towards managing recurrent local interspersed outbreaks of COVID-19. A key feature of Singapore's efforts to preserve health-care capacity was the implementation of the nationwide Home Recovery Programme (HRP), whereby patients were allowed to recover at home as long as they met certain criteria. The programme was centrally coordinated by Singapore's Ministry of Health and was supported by telemedicine providers, primary care physicians and government agencies. This report aims to highlight Singapore's experience in coordinating and implementing the HRP, the challenges faced and the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Published and internal data from the Ministry of Health in Singapore, along with policy documents, were reviewed together with a brief literature review of similar programmes conducted globally.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the HRP led to the majority of patients (98%) recovering from COVID-19 in the outpatient setting, with similar mortality rates to inpatient settings. Hospitalization rates for COVID-19 cases were reduced as compared to previously, alleviating strain on the health-care system.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The HRP was largely successful at preventing health-care capacities from being overwhelmed, while keeping fatalities to a minimum. Nonetheless, the risks of emergent variants of concern remain present, and heightened vigilance and potential modification of existing protocols based on fluctuations in virulence and infectivity are still needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":31512,"journal":{"name":"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Pacific Surveillance and Response","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5365/wpsar.2023.14.5.1003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: At the beginning of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic in Singapore, the strategy initially involved aggressive ring-fencing of infections, before pivoting towards managing recurrent local interspersed outbreaks of COVID-19. A key feature of Singapore's efforts to preserve health-care capacity was the implementation of the nationwide Home Recovery Programme (HRP), whereby patients were allowed to recover at home as long as they met certain criteria. The programme was centrally coordinated by Singapore's Ministry of Health and was supported by telemedicine providers, primary care physicians and government agencies. This report aims to highlight Singapore's experience in coordinating and implementing the HRP, the challenges faced and the outcomes.

Methods: Published and internal data from the Ministry of Health in Singapore, along with policy documents, were reviewed together with a brief literature review of similar programmes conducted globally.

Results: Implementation of the HRP led to the majority of patients (98%) recovering from COVID-19 in the outpatient setting, with similar mortality rates to inpatient settings. Hospitalization rates for COVID-19 cases were reduced as compared to previously, alleviating strain on the health-care system.

Discussion: The HRP was largely successful at preventing health-care capacities from being overwhelmed, while keeping fatalities to a minimum. Nonetheless, the risks of emergent variants of concern remain present, and heightened vigilance and potential modification of existing protocols based on fluctuations in virulence and infectivity are still needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状病毒病与家庭康复:新加坡视角
目的:在新加坡冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行开始时,该策略最初涉及积极的感染围栏,然后转向管理复发性的局部分散的COVID-19疫情。新加坡努力保持保健能力的一个关键特点是实施全国性的家庭康复方案(HRP),根据该方案,只要病人符合某些标准,就允许他们在家康复。该方案由新加坡卫生部集中协调,并得到远程医疗提供者、初级保健医生和政府机构的支持。本报告旨在强调新加坡在协调和实施HRP方面的经验、面临的挑战和成果。方法:对新加坡卫生部公布的和内部数据以及政策文件进行了回顾,并对全球开展的类似规划进行了简要的文献回顾。结果:HRP的实施导致大多数患者(98%)在门诊康复,死亡率与住院死亡率相似。与以前相比,COVID-19病例的住院率有所降低,减轻了卫生保健系统的压力。讨论:HRP在防止保健能力不堪重负,同时将死亡人数降至最低方面取得了很大成功。尽管如此,令人关注的新变种的风险仍然存在,仍然需要提高警惕,并根据毒力和传染性的波动对现有方案进行潜在的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response
Western Pacific Surveillance and Response PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Active case finding to detect symptomatic and subclinical pulmonary tuberculosis disease: implementation of computer-aided detection for chest radiography in Viet Nam. The Emergency Medical Team Initiative in the Western Pacific Region. Tuberculosis in Solomon Islands: why declining case notifications may not reflect true incidence. Large-scale salmonella outbreak associated with banh mi, Viet Nam, 2024. Sorcery and witchcraft beliefs on the front line of public health response in Papua New Guinea and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1