Monica Chen, Tisha A M Harper, Arnon Gal, Krista A Keller, Philip E Hamel
{"title":"Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Safe Corridors for Pin Placement in Rabbit Thoracolumbar Vertebrae and Sacrum.","authors":"Monica Chen, Tisha A M Harper, Arnon Gal, Krista A Keller, Philip E Hamel","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1776784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> The aim of this study was to identify safe corridors for pin placement in the terminal thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae and sacrum of rabbits using computed tomography (CT) in cadaveric models.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Computed tomographic imaging of 25 adult New Zealand white rabbit (<i>Oryctolagus cuniculi</i>) cadavers was evaluated. Safe insertion corridors at the cranial and caudal end cortical sections (ECS) of the vertebrae were determined using a multiplanar reconstruction software. Pins were placed to allow maximal bone purchase within the safe corridors. Post-procedure CT imaging was performed to evaluate the pin position.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The median safe corridor height in the thoracic and lumbar cranial ECS (2.54 mm; 1.39-3.97 mm) was significantly lower than that of caudal ECS (3.98 mm; 1.66-5.53 mm; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean widths of the left and right sacral safe corridors were not significantly different. Of the 99 pins placed, 70.7% of the pins were appropriately placed without vertebral canal impingement. Errors included partial canal impingement (12.1%), complete canal impingement (5.1%), inadequate bone purchase (7.1%), placement into the intervertebral disc space (1.0%) or in the incorrect ECS than intended (4.0%). The odds ratio of successful pin insertion without canal impingement was 2.77 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-7.43; <i>p</i> < 0.05) times higher in the caudal ECS than in the cranial ECS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The corridor identified in this study can be used as a guideline for pin placement in the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of New Zealand white rabbits. Further biomechanical studies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51204,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776784","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to identify safe corridors for pin placement in the terminal thoracic vertebrae, lumbar vertebrae and sacrum of rabbits using computed tomography (CT) in cadaveric models.
Study design: Computed tomographic imaging of 25 adult New Zealand white rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculi) cadavers was evaluated. Safe insertion corridors at the cranial and caudal end cortical sections (ECS) of the vertebrae were determined using a multiplanar reconstruction software. Pins were placed to allow maximal bone purchase within the safe corridors. Post-procedure CT imaging was performed to evaluate the pin position.
Results: The median safe corridor height in the thoracic and lumbar cranial ECS (2.54 mm; 1.39-3.97 mm) was significantly lower than that of caudal ECS (3.98 mm; 1.66-5.53 mm; p < 0.001). The mean widths of the left and right sacral safe corridors were not significantly different. Of the 99 pins placed, 70.7% of the pins were appropriately placed without vertebral canal impingement. Errors included partial canal impingement (12.1%), complete canal impingement (5.1%), inadequate bone purchase (7.1%), placement into the intervertebral disc space (1.0%) or in the incorrect ECS than intended (4.0%). The odds ratio of successful pin insertion without canal impingement was 2.77 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-7.43; p < 0.05) times higher in the caudal ECS than in the cranial ECS.
Conclusion: The corridor identified in this study can be used as a guideline for pin placement in the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of New Zealand white rabbits. Further biomechanical studies are required.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology (VCOT) is the most important single source for clinically relevant information in orthopaedics and neurosurgery available anywhere in the world today. It is unique in that it is truly comparative and there is an unrivalled mix of review articles and basic science amid the information that is immediately clinically relevant in veterinary surgery today.