School to prison pipelines: Associations between school exclusion, neurodisability and age of first conviction in male prisoners

Hope Kent , Amanda Kirby , Lee Hogarth , George Leckie , Rosie Cornish , Huw Williams
{"title":"School to prison pipelines: Associations between school exclusion, neurodisability and age of first conviction in male prisoners","authors":"Hope Kent ,&nbsp;Amanda Kirby ,&nbsp;Lee Hogarth ,&nbsp;George Leckie ,&nbsp;Rosie Cornish ,&nbsp;Huw Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.fsiml.2023.100123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Both school exclusion and neurodisability are prospective markers for increased risk of subsequent contact with criminal justice system in general and justice-involved samples. However, relationships between school exclusion, neurodisability, and age at first conviction have received minimal attention. Age at first conviction is an important outcome, as justice system contact is criminogenic, so people convicted at a younger age are at risk of becoming entrenched in the system. This issue was addressed with data collected from 3035 convicted male adults, who completed the Do-IT Profiler screening assessment in HMP Parc (Wales, UK). Multiple school exclusions were associated with earlier first convictions, with those excluded once, 2–3 times, and 4 or more times being first convicted 3, 5, and 6 years earlier on average than the never-excluded cohort. Of the excluded cohort, 45% were sent to a Pupil Referral Unit (PRU) (a facility for children excluded from mainstream school). They were first convicted an average of 2 years younger than those who were excluded but never sent to a PRU, and an average of 6 years younger than those who were never excluded. This suggests that being sent to a PRU is associated with earlier first convictions than exclusion alone. Each standard deviation increase in neurodisability (indexed by lower scores on a functional skills screener, used here as a proxy for neurodisability) was associated with being 0.5 years younger at first conviction. Finally, school exclusion was correlated with scores on the functional skills screener, suggesting that school exclusion could be a potential mechanism for the criminalisation of children with neurodisability. These findings elucidate associations between school exclusion (including PRU referral), poor functional skills indicative of neurodisability, and criminalisation at a younger age in prison populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33816,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International Mind and Law","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666353823000097/pdfft?md5=a4799aadf2b736e9391e97f82d09aa79&pid=1-s2.0-S2666353823000097-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International Mind and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666353823000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Both school exclusion and neurodisability are prospective markers for increased risk of subsequent contact with criminal justice system in general and justice-involved samples. However, relationships between school exclusion, neurodisability, and age at first conviction have received minimal attention. Age at first conviction is an important outcome, as justice system contact is criminogenic, so people convicted at a younger age are at risk of becoming entrenched in the system. This issue was addressed with data collected from 3035 convicted male adults, who completed the Do-IT Profiler screening assessment in HMP Parc (Wales, UK). Multiple school exclusions were associated with earlier first convictions, with those excluded once, 2–3 times, and 4 or more times being first convicted 3, 5, and 6 years earlier on average than the never-excluded cohort. Of the excluded cohort, 45% were sent to a Pupil Referral Unit (PRU) (a facility for children excluded from mainstream school). They were first convicted an average of 2 years younger than those who were excluded but never sent to a PRU, and an average of 6 years younger than those who were never excluded. This suggests that being sent to a PRU is associated with earlier first convictions than exclusion alone. Each standard deviation increase in neurodisability (indexed by lower scores on a functional skills screener, used here as a proxy for neurodisability) was associated with being 0.5 years younger at first conviction. Finally, school exclusion was correlated with scores on the functional skills screener, suggesting that school exclusion could be a potential mechanism for the criminalisation of children with neurodisability. These findings elucidate associations between school exclusion (including PRU referral), poor functional skills indicative of neurodisability, and criminalisation at a younger age in prison populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从学校到监狱的管道:男性囚犯的学校排斥、神经残疾和首次定罪年龄之间的关系
学校排斥和神经残疾都是随后与一般刑事司法系统和司法相关样本接触风险增加的前瞻性标志。然而,学校排斥、神经障碍和初犯年龄之间的关系很少受到关注。首次定罪的年龄是一个重要的结果,因为司法系统接触是犯罪的,所以在较年轻时被定罪的人有在系统中根深蒂固的风险。这个问题是通过从3035名被定罪的成年男性收集的数据来解决的,他们在HMP Parc(威尔士,英国)完成了Do-IT Profiler筛选评估。多次被学校排除在外的学生首次犯罪的时间更早,被学校排除一次、2-3次、4次或更多次的学生首次犯罪的时间比从未被学校排除在外的学生平均早3年、5年和6年。在被排除的队列中,45%被送到学生转介单位(PRU)(一个为被主流学校排除的儿童提供的设施)。他们第一次被定罪的年龄比那些被排除但从未被送进PRU的人平均小2岁,比那些从未被排除的人平均小6岁。这表明,被送进PRU与更早的首次定罪有关,而不仅仅是被排除在外。神经功能障碍的每一个标准差增加(在功能技能筛选中以较低的分数为索引,这里用作神经功能障碍的代理)与首次定罪时年龄年轻0.5岁相关。最后,学校排斥与功能技能筛选得分相关,这表明学校排斥可能是神经残疾儿童犯罪化的潜在机制。这些发现阐明了学校排斥(包括PRU转诊)、表明神经残疾的功能技能差和监狱人口中较年轻的犯罪之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
153 days
期刊最新文献
Expanding horizons through Forensic Science International: Mind and Law - Mental health and justice beyond violent offending Neuroscience and the insanity defense: Trying to put a round peg in a square hole A comparative analysis of public educational needs in the rehabilitative care of individuals who have committed serious criminal offences: A cross cultural study Head injury and associated disability in adults undergoing pre-sentencing assessment by criminal justice social work The emerging influence of Geopsychiatry in Forensic Psychiatry -- from global crises to local jurisdictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1