{"title":"Green bond in China: An effective hedge against global supply chain pressure?","authors":"Fanna Kong , Zhuoqiong Gao , Camelia Oprean-Stan","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Investigating green bonds' hedging ability against global supply chain disruptions is crucial to maximising investment returns. This analysis innnovatively uses the sub-sample technique to recognise the time-dependant transmission mechanism between green bonds<span> in China (CGB) and global supply chain pressure (GSCP), which further resolves if China's green bond is an effective hedge against global supply chain pressure. The conclusion ascertains that positive and negative impacts exist from GSCP to CGB, whereas the favourable one suggests that China's green bond is an effective hedge under high global supply chain stresses. However, an adverse effect indicates that low GSCP might accompany the development of a green bond market due to climate and environmental policies. In turn, GSCP is positively and negatively affected by CGB, and the favourable one reveals that the green bond market in China could reflect the condition of the global supply chain, but the adverse one cannot draw a similar conclusion. Under the background of the complex international economic situation and China's proposed carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, this discussion would provide significant suggestions for the public, enterprise and country.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 107167"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323006655","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Investigating green bonds' hedging ability against global supply chain disruptions is crucial to maximising investment returns. This analysis innnovatively uses the sub-sample technique to recognise the time-dependant transmission mechanism between green bonds in China (CGB) and global supply chain pressure (GSCP), which further resolves if China's green bond is an effective hedge against global supply chain pressure. The conclusion ascertains that positive and negative impacts exist from GSCP to CGB, whereas the favourable one suggests that China's green bond is an effective hedge under high global supply chain stresses. However, an adverse effect indicates that low GSCP might accompany the development of a green bond market due to climate and environmental policies. In turn, GSCP is positively and negatively affected by CGB, and the favourable one reveals that the green bond market in China could reflect the condition of the global supply chain, but the adverse one cannot draw a similar conclusion. Under the background of the complex international economic situation and China's proposed carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, this discussion would provide significant suggestions for the public, enterprise and country.
期刊介绍:
Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.