The role and effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD

{"title":"The role and effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) have been demonstrated in patients with COPD, most studies suggest that short-term programs are insufficient to maintain the benefits beyond a post-discharge period of 6 months to 1 year. We were interested to evaluate the effects of an innovative maintenance intervention compared with a usual after-care. Forty moderate to severe COPD patients, who had just completed their first inpatient PR, were consecutively included in either a maintenance group (MG) or a standard after-care group. The maintenance program was coordinated within a health-care network including self-help associations, and offered weekly activities. We measured the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), the quality of life using the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the dyspnea, the maximal workload and the health-care utilization. Data were collected at respiratory clinic admission and discharge, and at 6- and 12-month visits after the PR. After 12 months, we found statistically and clinically significant differences in favor of the MG in 6MWD (74<!--> <!-->m; <em>p</em>⩽0.01) and in the three domains of SGRQ: symptom (19%; <em>p</em>⩽0.01), activity (27%; <em>p</em>⩽0.01) and impact (32%; <em>p</em>⩽0.01). The results showed no difference between groups in dyspnea and maximal workload. We also found that the number of days spent in hospital for respiratory disorders was significantly lower in the MG after 12 months (<em>p</em>⩽0.03). The multidisciplinary management of COPD patients in the post-rehabilitation period within a health-care network including self-help associations seems to be an effective strategy for maintaining, and even improving, the benefits of a first initial structured program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101083,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rmedu.2008.06.018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Medicine: COPD Update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1745045408000506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) have been demonstrated in patients with COPD, most studies suggest that short-term programs are insufficient to maintain the benefits beyond a post-discharge period of 6 months to 1 year. We were interested to evaluate the effects of an innovative maintenance intervention compared with a usual after-care. Forty moderate to severe COPD patients, who had just completed their first inpatient PR, were consecutively included in either a maintenance group (MG) or a standard after-care group. The maintenance program was coordinated within a health-care network including self-help associations, and offered weekly activities. We measured the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), the quality of life using the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the dyspnea, the maximal workload and the health-care utilization. Data were collected at respiratory clinic admission and discharge, and at 6- and 12-month visits after the PR. After 12 months, we found statistically and clinically significant differences in favor of the MG in 6MWD (74 m; p⩽0.01) and in the three domains of SGRQ: symptom (19%; p⩽0.01), activity (27%; p⩽0.01) and impact (32%; p⩽0.01). The results showed no difference between groups in dyspnea and maximal workload. We also found that the number of days spent in hospital for respiratory disorders was significantly lower in the MG after 12 months (p⩽0.03). The multidisciplinary management of COPD patients in the post-rehabilitation period within a health-care network including self-help associations seems to be an effective strategy for maintaining, and even improving, the benefits of a first initial structured program.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺康复在COPD中的作用和效果
尽管肺康复(PR)对COPD患者的益处已得到证实,但大多数研究表明,短期计划不足以在出院后6个月至1年的时间内保持益处。我们感兴趣的是评估一种创新的维持干预与常规的术后护理的效果。40例刚刚完成第一次住院PR的中重度COPD患者被连续分为维持组(MG)和标准的术后护理组。维修计划在包括自助协会在内的保健网络内进行协调,并提供每周活动。我们测量了6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、使用圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)的生活质量、呼吸困难、最大工作量和医疗保健利用。数据收集于呼吸门诊入院和出院时,以及PR后6个月和12个月的随访。12个月后,我们发现6MWD (74 m;p < 0.01),并且在SGRQ的三个域中:症状(19%;P < 0.01),活性(27%;P < 0.01)和影响(32%;p⩽0.01)。结果显示,两组在呼吸困难和最大工作量方面没有差异。我们还发现,12个月后,MG组因呼吸系统疾病住院的天数明显较低(p < 0.03)。在包括自助协会在内的卫生保健网络中对康复后COPD患者进行多学科管理似乎是一种有效的策略,可以维持甚至改善最初结构化方案的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial ATS 2009 Conference Report Diabetes and metabolic dysfunction in COPD Investigating a potential role for macrolide therapy in COPD Comparison of new prognostic assessments in COPD patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1