[The role of emergency colonoscopy in colorectal hemorrhage].

P Giorgio, D Lorusso, G Di Matteo, G Chicco
{"title":"[The role of emergency colonoscopy in colorectal hemorrhage].","authors":"P Giorgio,&nbsp;D Lorusso,&nbsp;G Di Matteo,&nbsp;G Chicco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnosis of lower intestinal hemorrhage usually follows the successive sequence: a) digital rectal examination, b) rectosigmoidoscopy, c) barium enema, d) colonoscopy. This latter method has proven to be the most sensitive. This study is a retrospective examination of the results obtained by emergency colonoscopy on the diagnosis and treatment of lower intestinal hemorrhage. Out of 1258 colonoscopy procedures performed between January 1983 and June 1988 in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of our Institute, 44 (3.5%) were emergency procedures (within 48 hrs. after recovery) due to lower intestinal hemorrhage. The most frequent causes of hemorrhage found were the following: 1) hemorrhagic colitis (20.5%), 2) polyps (13.6%), 3) hemorrhoids (13.6%), 4) carcinoma (9.0%). The hemorrhagic source was not established in 9 cases (20.5%). The sensitivity of this method was therefore 97.2%. In 6 cases of hemorrhagic polyps treatment to stop bleeding was also possible by means of the colonoscopy (endoscopic polypectomy). In our experience, the emergency colonoscopy was found to be a highly sensitive diagnostic procedure for lower intestinal hemorrhages, permitting even definitive treatment of the lesion in 13.6% of cases with no complications associated with the technique. We feel therefore that, when available, it should be considered the first and foremost exam to be performed for emergency diagnosis of colo-rectal hemorrhages.</p>","PeriodicalId":18687,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dietologica e gastroenterologica","volume":"36 1","pages":"19-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dietologica e gastroenterologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnosis of lower intestinal hemorrhage usually follows the successive sequence: a) digital rectal examination, b) rectosigmoidoscopy, c) barium enema, d) colonoscopy. This latter method has proven to be the most sensitive. This study is a retrospective examination of the results obtained by emergency colonoscopy on the diagnosis and treatment of lower intestinal hemorrhage. Out of 1258 colonoscopy procedures performed between January 1983 and June 1988 in the Digestive Endoscopy Unit of our Institute, 44 (3.5%) were emergency procedures (within 48 hrs. after recovery) due to lower intestinal hemorrhage. The most frequent causes of hemorrhage found were the following: 1) hemorrhagic colitis (20.5%), 2) polyps (13.6%), 3) hemorrhoids (13.6%), 4) carcinoma (9.0%). The hemorrhagic source was not established in 9 cases (20.5%). The sensitivity of this method was therefore 97.2%. In 6 cases of hemorrhagic polyps treatment to stop bleeding was also possible by means of the colonoscopy (endoscopic polypectomy). In our experience, the emergency colonoscopy was found to be a highly sensitive diagnostic procedure for lower intestinal hemorrhages, permitting even definitive treatment of the lesion in 13.6% of cases with no complications associated with the technique. We feel therefore that, when available, it should be considered the first and foremost exam to be performed for emergency diagnosis of colo-rectal hemorrhages.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[急诊结肠镜检查在大肠癌出血中的作用]。
下肠出血的诊断通常遵循以下顺序:a)直肠指检,b)直肠乙状结肠镜检查,c)钡灌肠,d)结肠镜检查。后一种方法已被证明是最灵敏的。本研究回顾性分析急诊结肠镜检查对下肠出血的诊断和治疗的结果。在1983年1月至1988年6月期间,我院消化内窥镜科进行的1258例结肠镜检查中,44例(3.5%)为急诊手术(48小时内)。恢复后)因下肠出血。最常见的出血原因是:1)出血性结肠炎(20.5%),2)息肉(13.6%),3)痔疮(13.6%),4)癌(9.0%)。出血来源不明9例(20.5%)。该方法的灵敏度为97.2%。6例出血性息肉也可以通过结肠镜检查(内镜息肉切除术)止血。根据我们的经验,发现急诊结肠镜检查是一种对下肠出血高度敏感的诊断方法,在13.6%的病例中,甚至可以对病变进行明确治疗,而没有与该技术相关的并发症。因此,我们认为,在可能的情况下,它应该被视为紧急诊断结肠直肠出血的首要检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Preparation of the colon for endoscopic examinations. A clinical study]. [Migration and peptic ulcer]. [Antipyrine clearance in liver resections]. [Emergency endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage]. [Prevention of duodenal ulcer recurrence by the use of anti H2. Comparison of continuous long-term and seasonal therapy].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1