Behavioral tests used to assess central auditory processing in children - an integrative literature review

Amanda Maião Franklin Avanzi, Ana Cláudia Vieira Cardoso
{"title":"Behavioral tests used to assess central auditory processing in children - an integrative literature review","authors":"Amanda Maião Franklin Avanzi, Ana Cláudia Vieira Cardoso","doi":"10.1590/1982-0216/20232555623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the Brazilian bibliographic production, in the last decade, regarding the most used behavioral tests to assess central auditory processing in children. Methods: an integrative literature review, whose research question was, “Which behavioral tests are most used to assess children’s central auditory processing?”. The following search strategy “(auditory processing) AND (behavioral tests) AND (children)”, was used to consult the Oasisbr, VHL, and SciELO databases. Free-access studies, published in full text in national and international journals, in Brazilian Portuguese or English, with replicable methods, and whose descriptors and topics answered the research question, were selected. Reviews, opinion articles, administration reports, websites, policies with indicators, information systems, and repeated or duplicate publications, were excluded. Two researchers conducted the analysis, and the studies were classified as either feasible or unfeasible. Data were collected between September and November 2021 and organized in tables and spreadsheets developed in Microsoft Excel. Literature Review: initially, 64 studies were located, but after applying the eligibility criteria, 28 publications remained, which were read in full text. Conclusion: the Frequency Pattern Test, Dichotic Digits Test, Gaps in Noise Test, Speech-in-Noise Test, and Pediatric Speech Intelligibility were the most used behavioral tests to assess children’s auditory processing.","PeriodicalId":53238,"journal":{"name":"Revista CEFAC","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista CEFAC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0216/20232555623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the Brazilian bibliographic production, in the last decade, regarding the most used behavioral tests to assess central auditory processing in children. Methods: an integrative literature review, whose research question was, “Which behavioral tests are most used to assess children’s central auditory processing?”. The following search strategy “(auditory processing) AND (behavioral tests) AND (children)”, was used to consult the Oasisbr, VHL, and SciELO databases. Free-access studies, published in full text in national and international journals, in Brazilian Portuguese or English, with replicable methods, and whose descriptors and topics answered the research question, were selected. Reviews, opinion articles, administration reports, websites, policies with indicators, information systems, and repeated or duplicate publications, were excluded. Two researchers conducted the analysis, and the studies were classified as either feasible or unfeasible. Data were collected between September and November 2021 and organized in tables and spreadsheets developed in Microsoft Excel. Literature Review: initially, 64 studies were located, but after applying the eligibility criteria, 28 publications remained, which were read in full text. Conclusion: the Frequency Pattern Test, Dichotic Digits Test, Gaps in Noise Test, Speech-in-Noise Test, and Pediatric Speech Intelligibility were the most used behavioral tests to assess children’s auditory processing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于评估儿童中枢听觉处理的行为测试——综合文献综述
目的:分析巴西近十年来最常用的用于评估儿童中枢听觉加工的行为测试。方法:综合文献回顾,其研究问题是“哪种行为测试最常用于评估儿童的中央听觉处理?”使用以下搜索策略“(听觉处理)AND(行为测试)AND(儿童)”来查询Oasisbr、VHL和SciELO数据库。选择了在国内和国际期刊上以巴西葡萄牙语或英语全文发表的免费获取研究,采用可复制的方法,其描述符和主题回答了研究问题。综述、评论文章、行政报告、网站、带有指标的政策、信息系统和重复或重复的出版物被排除在外。两位研究人员进行了分析,并将这些研究分为可行和不可行两类。数据于2021年9月至11月收集,并在Microsoft Excel中开发表格和电子表格。文献综述:最初找到64项研究,但在应用资格标准后,剩下28项出版物,这些出版物全文阅读。结论:频率模式测验、二位数测验、噪声间隙测验、噪声中言语测验和儿童言语可理解性是评价儿童听觉加工最常用的行为测验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Contributions of urban planning for more food security in German cities]. Galvanic vestibular stimulation to improve postural instability, voluntary attention, and quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients Construction and validation of an informative handbook on speech-language-hearing therapy in primary health care Auditory middle latency responses and hearing skills in adults Electromyographic analysis of suprahyoid musculature before and after therapy taping in young women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1