Biodegradation of Malathion in Amended Soil by Indigenous Novel Bacterial Consortia and Analysis of Degradation Pathway

IF 2.9 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Systems Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.3390/soilsystems7040081
Mohd Ashraf Dar, Garima Kaushik
{"title":"Biodegradation of Malathion in Amended Soil by Indigenous Novel Bacterial Consortia and Analysis of Degradation Pathway","authors":"Mohd Ashraf Dar, Garima Kaushik","doi":"10.3390/soilsystems7040081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The capabilities of pure bacterial strains and their consortia isolated from agricultural soil were evaluated during a bioremediation process of the organophosphate pesticide malathion. The pure bacterial strains efficiently degraded 50.16–68.47% of the pesticide within 15 days of incubation, and metabolites were observed to accumulate in the soil. The consortia of three bacterial species [Micrococcus aloeverae (MAGK3) + Bacillus cereus (AGB3) + Bacillus paramycoides (AGM5)] degraded the malathion more effectively, and complete malathion removal was observed by the 15th day in soils inoculated with that consortium. In contrast, the combined activity of any two of these strains was lower than the mixed consortium of all of the strains. Individual mixed consortia of Micrococcus aloeverae (MAGK3) + Bacillus cereus (AGB3); Micrococcus aloeverae (MAGK3) + Bacillus paramycoides (AGM5); and Bacillus cereus (AGB3) + Bacillus paramycoides (AGM5) caused 76.58%, 70.95%, and 88.61% malathion degradation in soil, respectively. Several intermediate metabolites like malaoxon, malathion monocarboxylic acid, diethyl fumarate, and trimethyl thiophosphate were found to accumulate and be successively degraded during the bioremediation process via GC–MS detection. Thus, inoculating with a highly potent bacterial consortium isolated from in situ soil may result in the most effective pesticide degradation to significantly relieve soils from pesticide residues, and could be considered a prospective approach for the degradation and detoxification of environments contaminated with malathion and other organophosphate pesticides. This study reports the use of a mixed culture of Indigenous bacterial species for successful malathion degradation.","PeriodicalId":21908,"journal":{"name":"Soil Systems","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7040081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The capabilities of pure bacterial strains and their consortia isolated from agricultural soil were evaluated during a bioremediation process of the organophosphate pesticide malathion. The pure bacterial strains efficiently degraded 50.16–68.47% of the pesticide within 15 days of incubation, and metabolites were observed to accumulate in the soil. The consortia of three bacterial species [Micrococcus aloeverae (MAGK3) + Bacillus cereus (AGB3) + Bacillus paramycoides (AGM5)] degraded the malathion more effectively, and complete malathion removal was observed by the 15th day in soils inoculated with that consortium. In contrast, the combined activity of any two of these strains was lower than the mixed consortium of all of the strains. Individual mixed consortia of Micrococcus aloeverae (MAGK3) + Bacillus cereus (AGB3); Micrococcus aloeverae (MAGK3) + Bacillus paramycoides (AGM5); and Bacillus cereus (AGB3) + Bacillus paramycoides (AGM5) caused 76.58%, 70.95%, and 88.61% malathion degradation in soil, respectively. Several intermediate metabolites like malaoxon, malathion monocarboxylic acid, diethyl fumarate, and trimethyl thiophosphate were found to accumulate and be successively degraded during the bioremediation process via GC–MS detection. Thus, inoculating with a highly potent bacterial consortium isolated from in situ soil may result in the most effective pesticide degradation to significantly relieve soils from pesticide residues, and could be considered a prospective approach for the degradation and detoxification of environments contaminated with malathion and other organophosphate pesticides. This study reports the use of a mixed culture of Indigenous bacterial species for successful malathion degradation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良土壤中马拉硫磷的生物降解及降解途径分析
在有机磷农药马拉硫磷的生物修复过程中,评价了从农业土壤中分离的纯菌株及其菌群的生物修复能力。纯菌株在15 d内有效降解50.16 ~ 68.47%的农药,代谢产物在土壤中积累。芦荟微球菌(Micrococcus aloeverae, MAGK3) +蜡样芽孢杆菌(Bacillus cereus, AGB3) +副芽孢杆菌(Bacillus parycoides, AGM5) 3种菌群对马拉硫磷的降解效果较好,在接种该菌群的土壤中,到第15天可以完全去除马拉硫磷。相比之下,任何两个菌株的联合活性都低于所有菌株的混合财团。芦荟微球菌(MAGK3) +蜡样芽孢杆菌(AGB3)混合菌群;芦荟微球菌(MAGK3) +副芽孢杆菌(AGM5);蜡样芽孢杆菌(AGB3) +副芽孢杆菌(AGM5)对土壤马拉硫磷的降解率分别为76.58%、70.95%和88.61%。通过GC-MS检测发现,在生物修复过程中,有几种中间代谢物如丙拉氧磷、马拉硫磷单羧酸、富马酸二乙酯和硫代磷酸三甲酯积累并依次降解。因此,接种从原位土壤中分离出的高效细菌联合体可能导致最有效的农药降解,从而显著减轻土壤中的农药残留,并且可以被认为是降解和解毒被马拉硫磷和其他有机磷农药污染的环境的一种有前景的方法。本研究报告使用混合培养的本地细菌物种成功降解马拉硫磷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Systems
Soil Systems Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Structural Shifts in the Soil Prokaryotic Communities Marking the Podzol-Forming Process on Sand Dumps Soil Phytomining: Recent Developments—A Review Selenium and Heavy Metals in Soil–Plant System in a Hydrogeochemical Province with High Selenium Content in Groundwater: A Case Study of the Lower Dniester Valley Tillage and Cover Crop Systems Alter Soil Particle Size Distribution in Raised-Bed-and-Furrow Row-Crop Agroecosystems Shifts in Soil Bacterial Communities under Three-Year Fertilization Management and Multiple Cropping Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1