Technical Success and Safety of Transradial Uterine Artery Embolisation for Symptomatic Fibroids at a Single Centre in South Africa

Lumart Wiechers, Gary Sudwarts, Maja Wojno, Victor Mngomezulu
{"title":"Technical Success and Safety of Transradial Uterine Artery Embolisation for Symptomatic Fibroids at a Single Centre in South Africa","authors":"Lumart Wiechers, Gary Sudwarts, Maja Wojno, Victor Mngomezulu","doi":"10.18772/26180197.2023.v5n3a4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The femoral artery has remained the primary means of vascular access for uterine artery embolisation in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Transradial access for coronary artery catheterization is gaining wider acceptance, with studies in the cardiac literature demonstrating key advantages. The primary objective of this study was to compare the technical success and safety of the transradial approach for uterine artery embolization performed at a single centre in South Africa. Methods Data was obtained from consecutive patients undergoing uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids over a 30-month period. Specifically technical success and patient safety were analysed. Results A total of 496 patients were included in the study. Of these 27 patients had primary contraindications to radial access. The remaining 469 patients who underwent radial artery access, technical success was achieved in 459 cases (97.9%). The primary cause of technical failure was radial artery spasm (9.9%). Mean procedure times were 53.5 minutes ± 15.2 minutes with total screening times of 9.6 ± 9.1 minutes. The mean radiation dose area product was 6321.7 ± 3449.8 cGy.cm 2 . Complications were recorded in 40 (8.5%) patients, of which 7 (1.5%) were major complications. Conclusions This study corroborates evidence that this approach is a safe and effective alternative to the traditional transfemoral route for the treatment of uterine fibroids.","PeriodicalId":75326,"journal":{"name":"Wits journal of clinical medicine","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wits journal of clinical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18772/26180197.2023.v5n3a4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The femoral artery has remained the primary means of vascular access for uterine artery embolisation in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Transradial access for coronary artery catheterization is gaining wider acceptance, with studies in the cardiac literature demonstrating key advantages. The primary objective of this study was to compare the technical success and safety of the transradial approach for uterine artery embolization performed at a single centre in South Africa. Methods Data was obtained from consecutive patients undergoing uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic fibroids over a 30-month period. Specifically technical success and patient safety were analysed. Results A total of 496 patients were included in the study. Of these 27 patients had primary contraindications to radial access. The remaining 469 patients who underwent radial artery access, technical success was achieved in 459 cases (97.9%). The primary cause of technical failure was radial artery spasm (9.9%). Mean procedure times were 53.5 minutes ± 15.2 minutes with total screening times of 9.6 ± 9.1 minutes. The mean radiation dose area product was 6321.7 ± 3449.8 cGy.cm 2 . Complications were recorded in 40 (8.5%) patients, of which 7 (1.5%) were major complications. Conclusions This study corroborates evidence that this approach is a safe and effective alternative to the traditional transfemoral route for the treatment of uterine fibroids.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经子宫动脉栓塞治疗症状性肌瘤在南非单一中心的技术成功和安全性
摘要背景在子宫肌瘤治疗中,股动脉仍然是子宫动脉栓塞的主要血管通路。经桡动脉进入冠状动脉导管越来越被广泛接受,心脏文献研究表明了其主要优势。本研究的主要目的是比较经桡动脉入路在南非单一中心进行子宫动脉栓塞的技术成功和安全性。方法对连续30个月行子宫动脉栓塞治疗症状性肌瘤的患者进行资料收集。具体分析了技术成功和患者安全。结果共纳入496例患者。其中27例患者有放射状通路的主要禁忌症。其余469例患者行桡动脉通路,其中459例(97.9%)技术成功。技术失败的主要原因是桡动脉痉挛(9.9%)。平均手术时间为53.5分钟±15.2分钟,总筛查时间为9.6±9.1分钟。平均辐射剂量面积积为6321.7±3449.8 cGy。平方厘米。并发症40例(8.5%),其中主要并发症7例(1.5%)。结论该入路是传统经股入路治疗子宫肌瘤的一种安全有效的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Histological patterns of kidney disease at Helen Joseph Hospital: a 5-year retrospective review of biopsy diagnoses Tertiary Hospital ED Turnover: The Key Drivers Wits Department of Surgery BERT MYBURGH RESEARCH FORUM Severe lactic acidosis after re-exposure to linezolid in a person living with HIV and multidrug resistant tuberculosis: a case report Management of a Jehovah's Witness patient with ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1