Purposeful engagement: Improving the effectiveness of your campus-wide library committee

Q3 Social Sciences College and Research Libraries News Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5860/crln.84.10.392
Robert Labaree
{"title":"Purposeful engagement: Improving the effectiveness of your campus-wide library committee","authors":"Robert Labaree","doi":"10.5860/crln.84.10.392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the academic governance structure of many colleges and universities, there exists a campus-wide committee devoted to the library. The responsibilities of these committees vary depending on the shared decision-making culture of the institution, but most are unique because they oversee a single academic unit rather than specific areas of faculty rights and responsibilities or the operations of a large administrative division. An informal sampling of library committees at various institutions reveals that most have an advisory role to the dean of the library, the faculty senate, and/or the provost. Some have membership composed entirely of faculty, while others include academic staff and student leaders. Almost all include senior leadership in ex officio roles including, in many cases, the dean of the library. If managed effectively and leveraged to support the mission of the library, these committees can serve as a valuable link between librarians and disciplinary faculty and between librarians and campus administrators. However, if not managed effectively, the committee can lack transparency, possess no clear direction, and fail to make meaningful progress on issues of substance. With this in mind, below are recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of your campus-wide library committee.","PeriodicalId":55882,"journal":{"name":"College and Research Libraries News","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College and Research Libraries News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.84.10.392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the academic governance structure of many colleges and universities, there exists a campus-wide committee devoted to the library. The responsibilities of these committees vary depending on the shared decision-making culture of the institution, but most are unique because they oversee a single academic unit rather than specific areas of faculty rights and responsibilities or the operations of a large administrative division. An informal sampling of library committees at various institutions reveals that most have an advisory role to the dean of the library, the faculty senate, and/or the provost. Some have membership composed entirely of faculty, while others include academic staff and student leaders. Almost all include senior leadership in ex officio roles including, in many cases, the dean of the library. If managed effectively and leveraged to support the mission of the library, these committees can serve as a valuable link between librarians and disciplinary faculty and between librarians and campus administrators. However, if not managed effectively, the committee can lack transparency, possess no clear direction, and fail to make meaningful progress on issues of substance. With this in mind, below are recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of your campus-wide library committee.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有目的的参与:提高校园图书馆委员会的效率
在许多学院和大学的学术管理结构中,有一个专门负责图书馆的校园委员会。这些委员会的职责因机构的共同决策文化而异,但大多数都是独特的,因为它们监督单个学术单位,而不是教师权利和责任的特定领域或大型行政部门的运作。对不同机构的图书馆委员会进行的非正式抽样调查显示,大多数委员会对图书馆院长、教务委员会和/或教务长都有咨询作用。一些学校的成员完全由教师组成,而另一些学校则包括学术人员和学生领袖。几乎所有学校都包括当然担任高级领导职务的人员,在许多情况下,还包括图书馆院长。如果管理有效,并利用这些委员会来支持图书馆的使命,这些委员会可以作为图书馆馆员和学科教员以及图书馆馆员和校园管理人员之间的宝贵纽带。然而,如果管理不善,该委员会可能缺乏透明度,没有明确的方向,无法在实质性问题上取得有意义的进展。考虑到这一点,以下是最大限度地提高校园图书馆委员会效率的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
College and Research Libraries News
College and Research Libraries News Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Established in 1966, College & Research Libraries News (C&RL News) provides articles on the latest trends and practices affecting academic and research libraries and serves as the official newsmagazine and publication of record of ACRL. Monthly columns include Internet Resources, Internet Reviews, Preservation News, Washington Hotline, Grants and Acquisitions, People in the News, and New Publications. Other regular features are Scholarly Communication, Job of a Lifetime, and The Way I See It. C&RL News is published 11 times per year.
期刊最新文献
News from the Field Managing oneself in the face of downsizing: Strategies for empowering academic librarians Open science for all: Implementing the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science for an equitable and just transition to open science Internet Reviews Google SGE: A new way to search, teach, and resist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1