NPS from the customer’s perspective: The influence of the recent experience

IF 2.4 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS International Journal of Market Research Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1177/14707853231214188
Jonna Pechter, Andres Kuusik
{"title":"NPS from the customer’s perspective: The influence of the recent experience","authors":"Jonna Pechter, Andres Kuusik","doi":"10.1177/14707853231214188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a popular metric for measuring customer loyalty and is claimed by Reichheld to predict a company’s growth. However, various academic studies provide controversial results regarding its reliability and prediction powers. This study analyzes how respondents answer the likelihood-to-recommend (LTR) question in different predescribed and validated situations. One thousand participants are presented with situation descriptions that consist of previous and recent experiences with a bank and are asked how they would respond to the LTR question after such an experience. The results indicate that respondents do not always give a high score for good experiences, and a low score for bad experiences. However, with a high number of respondents, the different answering approaches even out, and the NPS results are higher for good than for bad experiences. Additionally, we notice that whereas negative experiences are evaluated as low by all respondents, Generation X and Boomers tend to give lower scores for neutral and positive experiences. Those with lower income and basic education give lower scores for neutral experiences. The recent experience influences the customer’s likelihood of recommending more than the previous experiences with the company.","PeriodicalId":47641,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Market Research","volume":"59 33","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231214188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Net Promoter Score (NPS) is a popular metric for measuring customer loyalty and is claimed by Reichheld to predict a company’s growth. However, various academic studies provide controversial results regarding its reliability and prediction powers. This study analyzes how respondents answer the likelihood-to-recommend (LTR) question in different predescribed and validated situations. One thousand participants are presented with situation descriptions that consist of previous and recent experiences with a bank and are asked how they would respond to the LTR question after such an experience. The results indicate that respondents do not always give a high score for good experiences, and a low score for bad experiences. However, with a high number of respondents, the different answering approaches even out, and the NPS results are higher for good than for bad experiences. Additionally, we notice that whereas negative experiences are evaluated as low by all respondents, Generation X and Boomers tend to give lower scores for neutral and positive experiences. Those with lower income and basic education give lower scores for neutral experiences. The recent experience influences the customer’s likelihood of recommending more than the previous experiences with the company.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
客户视角下的NPS:近期经历的影响
净推荐值(NPS)是衡量客户忠诚度的一个流行指标,Reichheld声称它可以预测公司的增长。然而,各种学术研究对其可靠性和预测能力提供了有争议的结果。本研究分析了受访者在不同的预先描述和验证的情况下如何回答推荐可能性(LTR)问题。向1000名参与者展示了由以前和最近在一家银行的经历组成的情况描述,并询问他们在这样的经历之后如何回答LTR问题。结果表明,受访者对良好体验的评分并不总是很高,而对糟糕体验的评分则很低。但是,如果被调查者的人数较多,不同的回答方式就会相互抵消,因此,国民年金调查的结果显示,“好的体验”比“不好的体验”要高。此外,我们注意到,尽管所有受访者对负面体验的评价都很低,但X一代和婴儿潮一代对中性和积极体验的评分往往较低。收入和基础教育水平较低的人在“中性体验”方面得分较低。最近的经历会影响客户推荐更多公司的可能性,而不是以前的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Market Research is the essential professional aid for users and providers of market research. IJMR will help you to: KEEP abreast of cutting-edge developments APPLY new research approaches to your business UNDERSTAND new tools and techniques LEARN from the world’s leading research thinkers STAY at the forefront of your profession
期刊最新文献
Examining stated improvement research methods Marketing Outcomes and Shareholder Value: A Review and Research Agenda Measuring prime ministerial brands: Exploring Needham’s framework for assessing the UK’s Boris Johnson and the Greek konstantinos mitsotakis Machine learning based methods for ratemaking health care insurance When “the more the better”? Mindfulness enhances the effect of the number of displayed product features in short video ADs on purchase intention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1