Competitive advantages and the proximity of investment: evidence from Hong Kong-listed real estate development firms in Mainland China

IF 2.1 Q2 URBAN STUDIES Journal of Property Research Pub Date : 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1080/09599916.2023.2279761
Song Shi, Shuping Wu, Zan Yang
{"title":"Competitive advantages and the proximity of investment: evidence from Hong Kong-listed real estate development firms in Mainland China","authors":"Song Shi, Shuping Wu, Zan Yang","doi":"10.1080/09599916.2023.2279761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis study examines the investment behaviour of Hong Kong-based real estate firms in Mainland China. Using a sample of individual land transactions, we find that firms with higher value of growth options, as perceived in the capital market, are more likely to invest actively and further away from their home base. However, over time, Hong Kong developers tend to decrease their level of activity in Mainland China, indicating that the ‘liability of foreignness’ becomes a significant challenge. Our findings highlight the importance of balancing strategic expansion with the inherent risks of operating in distant emerging markets.KEYWORDS: Growth optionsinvestment activitiesreal estate developmentslocation choicesHong Kong developers Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The oral auction follows a typical English open-outcry ascending auction, the tender is akin to a sealed-bid auction, and the listing auction is an ascending auction in two stages (Cai et al., Citation2013).2. First, the Chinese central government has issued a series of policies to ensure ‘housing is for living in and not speculation’ since 2016 (MOHURD, Citation2015; The State Council, Citation2016). Second, as required by China’s deleveraging campaign from 2015, Mainland developers face tight regulation to lower their high debt ratio and slow down their land buying, which could make Hong Kong developers more competitive in the land market. Lastly, there has been a significant change in the political relation between Hong Kong and Mainland China since 2019 due to the Hong Kong protests in 2019 and the passing of the Hong Kong national security law in 2020.3. The details of these 31 HK firms are available upon request.4. The arithmetic mean return of the Hang Seng Index (HSI) was about 8.35% per annum between 2004 and 2015; meanwhile the mean return of the Hang Seng Index – Properties (HSP) was around 11.80% per annum. Hong Kong developers typically aim for a profit margin of 15–20% when purchasing land, so a discount rate of 12% seems reasonable. On the study of the US equity market from 1976 to 1995, Dechow et al. (Citation1999) found that the historical average of abnormal earning persistence was about 0.62.5. We examined the V/P ratios of real estate firms listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchange markets. We found that Mainland real estate firms were trading significantly above their book values, with an average V/P ratio of 0.583 during the study period. The variation in V/P ratios could be attributed to two factors: Firstly, the difference in accounting rules for valuing a firm’s book value, particularly when it comes to land development. Secondly, the difference in pricing of these real estate development firms in the stock market.6. Separating state-owned enterprises or firms controlled by corporates or individuals in Mainland China would not alter our main findings. Among the 31 listed Hong Kong-based real estate firms, 13 of which were controlled by corporates or individual in Hong Kong, and the remaining 18 were controlled in Mainland China. These results are not tabulated to conserve space in the document, but are available upon request.7. Exp (−0.492*-1.058)-1 = 0.683.8. Since the number of land purchases made by a firm in year t can be zero and is typically small (the average land purchase is 3.374 as shown in Panel A of Table 1), applying a log transformation of log(1+y) to this variable would have a more pronounced downward effect on the regression coefficients. For this reason, we have used the number of land purchases in its original form in this study. The results of using a log transformation of the number of land purchases are available upon request.9. See Gabaix (Citation2009) for more information on power laws in economics and finance.10. These results are available upon request.11. The estimated annual return of HSI and HSP indices are available upon request.","PeriodicalId":45726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Property Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Property Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2023.2279761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study examines the investment behaviour of Hong Kong-based real estate firms in Mainland China. Using a sample of individual land transactions, we find that firms with higher value of growth options, as perceived in the capital market, are more likely to invest actively and further away from their home base. However, over time, Hong Kong developers tend to decrease their level of activity in Mainland China, indicating that the ‘liability of foreignness’ becomes a significant challenge. Our findings highlight the importance of balancing strategic expansion with the inherent risks of operating in distant emerging markets.KEYWORDS: Growth optionsinvestment activitiesreal estate developmentslocation choicesHong Kong developers Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The oral auction follows a typical English open-outcry ascending auction, the tender is akin to a sealed-bid auction, and the listing auction is an ascending auction in two stages (Cai et al., Citation2013).2. First, the Chinese central government has issued a series of policies to ensure ‘housing is for living in and not speculation’ since 2016 (MOHURD, Citation2015; The State Council, Citation2016). Second, as required by China’s deleveraging campaign from 2015, Mainland developers face tight regulation to lower their high debt ratio and slow down their land buying, which could make Hong Kong developers more competitive in the land market. Lastly, there has been a significant change in the political relation between Hong Kong and Mainland China since 2019 due to the Hong Kong protests in 2019 and the passing of the Hong Kong national security law in 2020.3. The details of these 31 HK firms are available upon request.4. The arithmetic mean return of the Hang Seng Index (HSI) was about 8.35% per annum between 2004 and 2015; meanwhile the mean return of the Hang Seng Index – Properties (HSP) was around 11.80% per annum. Hong Kong developers typically aim for a profit margin of 15–20% when purchasing land, so a discount rate of 12% seems reasonable. On the study of the US equity market from 1976 to 1995, Dechow et al. (Citation1999) found that the historical average of abnormal earning persistence was about 0.62.5. We examined the V/P ratios of real estate firms listed in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchange markets. We found that Mainland real estate firms were trading significantly above their book values, with an average V/P ratio of 0.583 during the study period. The variation in V/P ratios could be attributed to two factors: Firstly, the difference in accounting rules for valuing a firm’s book value, particularly when it comes to land development. Secondly, the difference in pricing of these real estate development firms in the stock market.6. Separating state-owned enterprises or firms controlled by corporates or individuals in Mainland China would not alter our main findings. Among the 31 listed Hong Kong-based real estate firms, 13 of which were controlled by corporates or individual in Hong Kong, and the remaining 18 were controlled in Mainland China. These results are not tabulated to conserve space in the document, but are available upon request.7. Exp (−0.492*-1.058)-1 = 0.683.8. Since the number of land purchases made by a firm in year t can be zero and is typically small (the average land purchase is 3.374 as shown in Panel A of Table 1), applying a log transformation of log(1+y) to this variable would have a more pronounced downward effect on the regression coefficients. For this reason, we have used the number of land purchases in its original form in this study. The results of using a log transformation of the number of land purchases are available upon request.9. See Gabaix (Citation2009) for more information on power laws in economics and finance.10. These results are available upon request.11. The estimated annual return of HSI and HSP indices are available upon request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争优势与投资邻近性:来自中国内地在港上市房地产开发公司的证据
摘要本研究考察了香港房地产企业在中国大陆的投资行为。使用单个土地交易样本,我们发现,在资本市场上,具有更高增长期权价值的公司更有可能积极投资,并远离其总部。然而,随着时间的推移,香港开发商倾向于减少他们在中国大陆的活动水平,这表明“外国人的责任”成为一个重大挑战。我们的研究结果强调了平衡战略扩张与在遥远的新兴市场经营的固有风险的重要性。关键词:成长性选择投资活动房地产开发选址香港开发商披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。口头拍卖遵循典型的英国公开叫价上行拍卖,招标类似于密封竞价拍卖,挂牌拍卖是分两个阶段的上行拍卖(Cai et al., Citation2013)。首先,自2016年以来,中国中央政府发布了一系列政策,以确保“住房是用来住的,不是用来炒的”(住房和城乡建设部,Citation2015;国务院学报,Citation2016)。其次,根据中国从2015年开始的去杠杆运动的要求,内地开发商面临严格的监管,以降低其高负债率并放缓土地购买,这可能使香港开发商在土地市场上更具竞争力。最后,2019年以来,由于2019年的香港抗议活动和2020年香港国家安全法的通过,香港与中国大陆的政治关系发生了重大变化。这31家香港公司的详细资料可随时索取。2004年至2015年,恒生指数的算术平均回报率约为每年8.35%;与此同时,恒生地产指数(HSP)的平均年回报率约为11.80%。香港开发商在购买土地时通常希望获得15-20%的利润率,因此12%的折扣率似乎是合理的。Dechow et al. (Citation1999)在对1976 - 1995年美国股票市场的研究中发现,异常盈利持续性的历史平均值约为0.62.5。我们研究了在上海和深圳证券交易所上市的房地产公司的V/P比率。我们发现,在研究期间,内地房地产公司的股价显著高于其账面价值,平均V/P为0.583。V/P比率的差异可归因于两个因素:首先,评估公司账面价值的会计规则的差异,特别是在土地开发方面。其次,这些房地产开发公司在股票市场上的定价差异。将中国大陆的国有企业或由公司或个人控制的公司分开不会改变我们的主要发现。在31家上市的香港房地产公司中,有13家由香港的企业或个人控制,其余18家由中国内地控制。为节省篇幅,这些结果未制成表格,但可应要求提供。Exp(- 0.492*-1.058)-1 = 0.683.8。由于公司在t年购买土地的数量可以为零,并且通常很小(如表1的面板a所示,平均土地购买为3.374),因此对该变量应用log(1+y)的对数变换将对回归系数产生更明显的向下影响。因此,我们在本研究中使用了原始形式的土地购买数量。使用土地购买数量的对数转换的结果可应要求提供。参见Gabaix (Citation2009)获得更多关于经济和金融中的幂律的信息。这些结果可应要求提供。恒生指数及恒生指数的估计年回报率可按要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Property Research is an international journal. The title reflects the expansion of research, particularly applied research, into property investment and development. The Journal of Property Research publishes papers in any area of real estate investment and development. These may be theoretical, empirical, case studies or critical literature surveys.
期刊最新文献
Digitalisation and valuations: an empirical analysis of valuers’ supplemental skills requirements From agriculture to new town: land conversion towards new-build gentrification in the southwest of Jakarta, Indonesia The impact of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on SA REITs’ performance Do private rental tenants pay for energy efficiency?: The dynamics of green premiums and brown discounts Changes in risk appreciation, and short memory of house buyers when the market is hot, a case study of Christchurch, New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1