The Combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment in Teaching Speaking

Ideas Pub Date : 2023-09-27 DOI:10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3590
Asriadi Rasyid
{"title":"The Combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment in Teaching Speaking","authors":"Asriadi Rasyid","doi":"10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main problems of this research were how to improve the speaking ability of EFL students converting grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, discourse, and strategies. therefore, how to encourage them to use English. This research aimed to see whether the combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment may enhance the speaking ability of EFL students. A quasi-experimental method with non-equivalent group design was carried out in this research. The population was the third semester of English Department students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare. Two classes from the population, representing the experimental class and the control class, were selected using the cluster random selection technique as the study's sample. This research used an interview test with a variety of themes as its instrument. Pre-test, treatment, and post-test were the three steps that made up the data collection processes. The data that obtained by the test were then submitted to a quantitative analysis. The research findings demonstrate that the experimental class students' speaking abilities were better to those of the control class. The data from the experimental class showed that the students' mean score was higher compared to the control class (59,68 > 49,06). In conclusion, the combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment was improved the students’ speaking ability.","PeriodicalId":34645,"journal":{"name":"Ideas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main problems of this research were how to improve the speaking ability of EFL students converting grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, discourse, and strategies. therefore, how to encourage them to use English. This research aimed to see whether the combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment may enhance the speaking ability of EFL students. A quasi-experimental method with non-equivalent group design was carried out in this research. The population was the third semester of English Department students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare. Two classes from the population, representing the experimental class and the control class, were selected using the cluster random selection technique as the study's sample. This research used an interview test with a variety of themes as its instrument. Pre-test, treatment, and post-test were the three steps that made up the data collection processes. The data that obtained by the test were then submitted to a quantitative analysis. The research findings demonstrate that the experimental class students' speaking abilities were better to those of the control class. The data from the experimental class showed that the students' mean score was higher compared to the control class (59,68 > 49,06). In conclusion, the combination of British Parliamentary Debate and Peer Assessment was improved the students’ speaking ability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国议会辩论与同伴评议在口语教学中的结合
本研究的主要问题是如何从语法、词汇、发音、语篇和策略等方面提高英语学生的口语能力。因此,如何鼓励他们使用英语。本研究旨在了解英国议会辩论和同伴评估相结合是否可以提高英语学生的口语能力。本研究采用非等效组设计的准实验方法。这是穆罕默德大学英语系第三学期的学生。采用聚类随机选择技术,从总体中选取实验班和对照班两类作为研究样本。本研究采用多种主题的访谈测试作为工具。前测、处理和后测是组成数据收集过程的三个步骤。然后将测试获得的数据提交给定量分析。研究结果表明,实验班学生的口语能力明显优于控制班学生。来自实验班的数据显示,学生的平均得分高于对照组(59,68 >49岁,06年)。综上所述,英国议会辩论和同伴评估的结合提高了学生的口语能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Philippe Colin, Lissell Quiroz, Pensées décoloniales. Une introduction aux théories critiques d’Amérique latine Le documentaire engagé : sport dans les Amériques La batalla cultural en la década los 60. La ley 14.101 y los docentes como enemigos de la Nación Elizabeth Kelly Gray, Habit Forming: Drug Addiction in America, 1776-1914 La persecución penal de los crímenes de las dictaduras de Chile y Uruguay. A 50 años de los golpes de Estado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1