Reluctant cooptation: The legislative recruitment of the private sector into Russia’s dominant party, 2015–2020

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Party Politics Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1177/13540688231202856
Timofei Mikhasev, Grigorii V Golosov
{"title":"Reluctant cooptation: The legislative recruitment of the private sector into Russia’s dominant party, 2015–2020","authors":"Timofei Mikhasev, Grigorii V Golosov","doi":"10.1177/13540688231202856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cooptation is one of the most efficient strategies employed by authoritarian regimes and their leaders in order to survive in power. In most of these regimes, dominant pro-government parties serve as important tools of cooptation in general and of legislative recruitment, as one of its forms, in particular. The main thesis of this study is that cooptation is selective. When contrasted to the social sectors that are directly linked to the state, the private sector will be at a relative disadvantage, resulting in a smaller scope of cooptation. To test this thesis empirically, we build several hypotheses based on our expectations regarding the effects of electoral rules on candidate selection, and then test these hypotheses against the data from 82 regional legislative elections held in Russia in 2015–2020. The analysis confirms our main thesis and clarifies several findings previously reported in the literature on business and politics in Russia.","PeriodicalId":48122,"journal":{"name":"Party Politics","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Party Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231202856","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cooptation is one of the most efficient strategies employed by authoritarian regimes and their leaders in order to survive in power. In most of these regimes, dominant pro-government parties serve as important tools of cooptation in general and of legislative recruitment, as one of its forms, in particular. The main thesis of this study is that cooptation is selective. When contrasted to the social sectors that are directly linked to the state, the private sector will be at a relative disadvantage, resulting in a smaller scope of cooptation. To test this thesis empirically, we build several hypotheses based on our expectations regarding the effects of electoral rules on candidate selection, and then test these hypotheses against the data from 82 regional legislative elections held in Russia in 2015–2020. The analysis confirms our main thesis and clarifies several findings previously reported in the literature on business and politics in Russia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不情愿的合作:2015-2020年,私营部门进入俄罗斯主导政党的立法招募
拉拢是独裁政权及其领导人为了在权力中生存而采用的最有效的策略之一。在大多数这些政权中,占主导地位的亲政府政党是一般的合作和特别是作为其形式之一的立法人员招募的重要工具。本研究的主要论点是,合作是选择性的。与直接与国家挂钩的社会部门相比,私营部门将处于相对劣势,导致合作范围较小。为了从经验上验证这一理论,我们基于我们对选举规则对候选人选择影响的预期建立了几个假设,然后用2015-2020年俄罗斯82个地区立法选举的数据对这些假设进行了检验。该分析证实了我们的主要论点,并澄清了先前在有关俄罗斯商业和政治的文献中报道的一些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Party Politics
Party Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Political parties are intrinsic to every democratic political system, and with the dramatic changes that regularly sweep the political landscape, the study of their function and form is one of the most dynamic areas within contemporary scholarship. Party Politics is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the study of this integral component within political science. This major international journal provides a forum for the analysis of political parties, including their historical development, structure, policy programmes, ideology, electoral and campaign strategies, and their role within the various national and international political systems of which they are a part.
期刊最新文献
Common sense, populism, and reactionary politics on Twitter: An analysis of populist far-right common sense narratives between 2008 and 2022 ‘Party position, electoral incentives, and attention to European Union issues in the 2019 European Parliament election’ Book Review: The closed partisan mind – A new psychology of American polarization Book Review: The Republican Evolution: From Governing Party to Antigovernment Party, 1860-2020 State government control and partisan happiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1