Co-creation and societal impact: Toward a generic framework for research impact assessment

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.1177/13563890231195906
Daria-Maria Gerke, Katrin Uude, Thorsten Kliewe
{"title":"Co-creation and societal impact: Toward a generic framework for research impact assessment","authors":"Daria-Maria Gerke, Katrin Uude, Thorsten Kliewe","doi":"10.1177/13563890231195906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Academia focuses on the interplay of Higher Education Institutions and external stakeholders. In this context, academia is concerned with the societal impact and impact created in interactions with external stakeholders; the latter is often referred to as impact co-creation. There is agreement that the related processes leading to an impact are complex and multi-dimensional. However, academics disagree on how the ultimate, wider impact of research should be measured. This study seeks to conceptualize societal impact through the lens of value co-creation, arguing that societal impact is best conceptualized as the uptake of research. Based on this, we developed a generic research impact assessment framework to facilitate evaluations and enable cross-sector learning. This study contributes to academia by providing an overarching understanding of impact creation, including wider research impact, and offers the perspective that any research project involving stakeholders to a certain extent, also entails co-production.","PeriodicalId":47511,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231195906","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academia focuses on the interplay of Higher Education Institutions and external stakeholders. In this context, academia is concerned with the societal impact and impact created in interactions with external stakeholders; the latter is often referred to as impact co-creation. There is agreement that the related processes leading to an impact are complex and multi-dimensional. However, academics disagree on how the ultimate, wider impact of research should be measured. This study seeks to conceptualize societal impact through the lens of value co-creation, arguing that societal impact is best conceptualized as the uptake of research. Based on this, we developed a generic research impact assessment framework to facilitate evaluations and enable cross-sector learning. This study contributes to academia by providing an overarching understanding of impact creation, including wider research impact, and offers the perspective that any research project involving stakeholders to a certain extent, also entails co-production.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同创造与社会影响:研究影响评估的通用框架
学术界关注的是高等教育机构和外部利益相关者之间的相互作用。在这种背景下,学术界关注的是与外部利益相关者互动所产生的社会影响和影响;后者通常被称为影响共同创造。人们一致认为,导致影响的相关过程是复杂和多维的。然而,学术界对如何衡量研究的最终、更广泛的影响存在分歧。本研究试图通过价值共同创造的视角来概念化社会影响,认为社会影响最好被概念化为研究的吸收。在此基础上,我们制定了一个通用的研究影响评估框架,以促进评估和跨部门学习。本研究通过提供对影响创造的总体理解,包括更广泛的研究影响,为学术界做出了贡献,并提供了任何涉及利益相关者的研究项目在一定程度上也需要合作生产的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation
Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Using co-creation to address monitoring and evaluation challenges: The experience of South Africa’s evaluation hackathon What role should we play to be effective evaluators? – practitioner reflections Principles and methods to advance value for money Evaluating site selection at design in food systems interventions: A formative geospatial approach What works in democracy support? How to fill evidence and usability gaps through evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1