Exploring Listening Strategies Employed by EFL Learners in Question and Response Tasks

Q4 Arts and Humanities Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.5539/elt.v16n10p13
Nirachorn Boonchukusol, Nantikarn SimmaSeangyaporn
{"title":"Exploring Listening Strategies Employed by EFL Learners in Question and Response Tasks","authors":"Nirachorn Boonchukusol, Nantikarn SimmaSeangyaporn","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n10p13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to explore listening strategies EFL learners use when completing mock TOEIC listening tests; investigate listening strategies that lead to success in answering the test questions; and find out how differently high-, intermediate-, and low-proficiency learners use listening strategies in four different task types. A total of 23 participants were selected for stimulated recall protocol interviews. Verbal reports from each participant were coded using taxonomy, and each strategy participants used was grouped according to listening task type. The results from the stimulated recall protocol interviews revealed that participants employed identification of words and chunks, hypothesis formation, monitoring against the question, and matching lexis heard to lexis in the question strategies to help them arrive at the answers in the question and response part. Learners with the three levels of proficiency employed similar strategies in their listening test. However, the frequency and quality of the strategies used to help them arrive at their answers were completely different. Learners whose linguistic knowledge was limited struggled to apply listening strategies to solve listening problems, whereas learners whose linguistic knowledge was automatic were able to comprehend the listening passage and apply appropriate strategies synchronously to solve listening problems.","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n10p13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore listening strategies EFL learners use when completing mock TOEIC listening tests; investigate listening strategies that lead to success in answering the test questions; and find out how differently high-, intermediate-, and low-proficiency learners use listening strategies in four different task types. A total of 23 participants were selected for stimulated recall protocol interviews. Verbal reports from each participant were coded using taxonomy, and each strategy participants used was grouped according to listening task type. The results from the stimulated recall protocol interviews revealed that participants employed identification of words and chunks, hypothesis formation, monitoring against the question, and matching lexis heard to lexis in the question strategies to help them arrive at the answers in the question and response part. Learners with the three levels of proficiency employed similar strategies in their listening test. However, the frequency and quality of the strategies used to help them arrive at their answers were completely different. Learners whose linguistic knowledge was limited struggled to apply listening strategies to solve listening problems, whereas learners whose linguistic knowledge was automatic were able to comprehend the listening passage and apply appropriate strategies synchronously to solve listening problems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探究英语学习者在问答任务中的听力策略
本研究旨在探讨英语学习者在完成托业模拟听力测试时所使用的听力策略;调查听力策略,帮助学生成功回答测试问题;并找出高水平、中级和低水平学习者在四种不同类型的任务中使用听力策略的差异。共有23名参与者被选中进行刺激回忆协议访谈。每个参与者的口头报告使用分类法进行编码,参与者使用的每种策略根据听力任务类型进行分组。受刺激回忆协议访谈的结果显示,被试在问题策略中采用词和块的识别、假设的形成、对问题的监控、听到的词汇与词汇的匹配等方法来帮助他们获得问题和回答部分的答案。三个水平的学习者在听力测试中采用了相似的策略。然而,用于帮助他们得出答案的策略的频率和质量是完全不同的。语言知识有限的学习者难以运用听力策略解决听力问题,而语言知识自动的学习者能够同步理解听力文章并运用适当的策略解决听力问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of English L2 Vocabulary Learning and Teaching: Concepts, Principles, and Pedagogy Actual Usage of Machine Translation by Japanese University Students and Verification of Test Results Reviewer acknowledgements for English Language Teaching, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2023 Research on the Promotion of EAP Teachers' Information Literacy under TPACK Framework in the Era of Digital Intelligence Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI): Chat GPT for Effective English Language Learning among Thai Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1