Healthcare in prison: Does it matter how it is provided?

Janet Bowstead
{"title":"Healthcare in prison: Does it matter how it is provided?","authors":"Janet Bowstead","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesFrom April 2013, responsibility for healthcare services for prisoners was shifted to NHS England. Administrative survey data from English prisons covering 2000-2021 was used to identify if this change affected detainees’ experiences of healthcare quality and/or access; as well as the association with other characteristics of prison or prisoner.
 MethodsSince 2000, HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) has carried out surveys of detainees as part of its inspections. This presentation will highlight the potential of these datasets by presenting substantive results of analysis on detainees’ experience of healthcare in prison. Merging datasets over time provides continuity of some variables over the whole period, with responses from up to 95,000 individuals. Variables of detainees’ assessment of the ease of access to different healthcare professionals, as well as the quality of services provided, were analysed over time and in terms of association with different types of prison and demographics of prisoner.
 ResultsThe HMIP data are used to inform inspections and reports, and an ESRC-funded project has now developed these administrative datasets for wider research use. With a timeframe of over 20 years, the data can be analysed on a range of policy-relevant prison issues, such as safety, preparation for release, support within prison, treatment of prisoners, and access to information, legal rights, education, exercise and healthcare. These can be associated with demographic characteristics of detainees, and functional types of prison; as well as the analysis presented here of trends over time and whether these can be aligned to distinct policy or practice changes. The policy change in healthcare provision in April 2013 is contextualised within trends of greater health needs of prisoners and differentials between prisoners.
 ConclusionHMIP detainee survey data are now archived with the UK Data Service for research use. Cross-sectional analysis on a range of demographic factors shows differential healthcare needs and experiences, and analysis over time indicates both trends and the impact, or not, of policy changes on detainees’ experiences.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesFrom April 2013, responsibility for healthcare services for prisoners was shifted to NHS England. Administrative survey data from English prisons covering 2000-2021 was used to identify if this change affected detainees’ experiences of healthcare quality and/or access; as well as the association with other characteristics of prison or prisoner. MethodsSince 2000, HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) has carried out surveys of detainees as part of its inspections. This presentation will highlight the potential of these datasets by presenting substantive results of analysis on detainees’ experience of healthcare in prison. Merging datasets over time provides continuity of some variables over the whole period, with responses from up to 95,000 individuals. Variables of detainees’ assessment of the ease of access to different healthcare professionals, as well as the quality of services provided, were analysed over time and in terms of association with different types of prison and demographics of prisoner. ResultsThe HMIP data are used to inform inspections and reports, and an ESRC-funded project has now developed these administrative datasets for wider research use. With a timeframe of over 20 years, the data can be analysed on a range of policy-relevant prison issues, such as safety, preparation for release, support within prison, treatment of prisoners, and access to information, legal rights, education, exercise and healthcare. These can be associated with demographic characteristics of detainees, and functional types of prison; as well as the analysis presented here of trends over time and whether these can be aligned to distinct policy or practice changes. The policy change in healthcare provision in April 2013 is contextualised within trends of greater health needs of prisoners and differentials between prisoners. ConclusionHMIP detainee survey data are now archived with the UK Data Service for research use. Cross-sectional analysis on a range of demographic factors shows differential healthcare needs and experiences, and analysis over time indicates both trends and the impact, or not, of policy changes on detainees’ experiences.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监狱中的医疗保健:如何提供重要吗?
目的从2013年4月起,囚犯保健服务的责任移交给英国国民保健服务体系。使用2000年至2021年期间英国监狱的行政调查数据来确定这一变化是否影响了被拘留者对医疗质量和/或获得医疗服务的体验;以及与监狱、罪犯的其他特征的联系。 方法自2000年以来,英国监狱监察局(HMIP)对在押人员进行了调查,作为其检查的一部分。本次介绍将通过介绍对被拘留者在监狱中的医疗保健经历进行分析的实质性结果,突出这些数据集的潜力。随着时间的推移合并数据集提供了整个时期内一些变量的连续性,其中有多达95,000个人的响应。对被拘留者评估获得不同保健专业人员服务的难易程度以及所提供服务的质量的变量进行了长期分析,并根据与不同类型监狱和囚犯人口统计数据的关联进行了分析。HMIP数据用于通知检查和报告,esrc资助的项目现在已经开发了这些管理数据集,用于更广泛的研究。这些数据的时间跨度超过20年,可以分析一系列与政策有关的监狱问题,如安全、释放准备、监狱内的支助、囚犯待遇、获取信息、法律权利、教育、锻炼和保健。这些因素可能与被拘留者的人口特征和监狱的功能类型有关;此外,本文还分析了一段时间以来的趋势,以及这些趋势是否可以与不同的政策或实践变化相一致。2013年4月在医疗保健方面的政策变化是根据囚犯更大的健康需求趋势和囚犯之间的差异进行的。结论hmip被拘留者调查数据现已存档于英国数据服务中心,供研究使用。对一系列人口因素的横断面分析显示出不同的保健需求和经验,长期分析表明了政策变化对被拘留者经验的趋势和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using novel data linkage of biobank data with administrative health data to inform genomic analysis for future precision medicine treatment of congenital heart disease Common governance model: a way to avoid data segregation between existing trusted research environment Federated learning for generating synthetic data: a scoping review Health Data Governance for Research Use in Alberta Establishment of a birth-to-education cohort of 1 million Palestinian refugees using electronic medical records and electronic education records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1