The adoption paradox: Exploring the role of ethnicity, deprivation, and co-ethnic density in care proceedings in England

Bachar Alrouh, Mariam Abouelenin, Stefanie Doebler, Karen Broadhurst
{"title":"The adoption paradox: Exploring the role of ethnicity, deprivation, and co-ethnic density in care proceedings in England","authors":"Bachar Alrouh, Mariam Abouelenin, Stefanie Doebler, Karen Broadhurst","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study objectives were to (1) examine the association between children’s ethnicity and final legal orders at the end of family care proceedings (section 31 of the 1989 Children Act), and (2) test whether residential context, such as co-ethnic density and area-level deprivation, moderates this association.
 Two sources of data were used for this study. The first consisted of records routinely generated by Cafcass (England) and stored in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank, and the second was the 2021 England Census. The focus was on children whose initial care proceedings took place between 2015/2016 and 2020/2021 and concluded with a recorded final legal order outcome (N = 98,161). Three-level logistic regression models were employed to estimate the relationship between children's ethnicity and adoption, along with the potential moderating effects of co-ethnic density and area-level deprivation.
 Children's ethnicity is significantly associated with placement for adoption, with white children being more likely to be subject to placement orders compared to children from all other ethnic groups combined (Asian, black, mixed or multiple, and other ethnic groups). Higher local authority co-ethnic density considerably reduces the likelihood of adoption for children of other ethnicities besides white, but not for white children. Moreover, white children living in the most deprived LSOAs are more likely to be placed for adoption than those residing in the least deprived LSOAs. However, the likelihood of placement for adoption remains consistent across all LSOA deprivation quintiles for children from ethnicities other than white. Local authority-level deprivation does not appear to moderate the relationship between children's ethnicity and adoption.
 This study sheds light on the intricate relationship between ethnicity, residential context, and adoption. While previous research has indicated that white children are more likely to be adopted, the findings enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms influencing adoption, paving the way for a more equitable family justice system.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study objectives were to (1) examine the association between children’s ethnicity and final legal orders at the end of family care proceedings (section 31 of the 1989 Children Act), and (2) test whether residential context, such as co-ethnic density and area-level deprivation, moderates this association. Two sources of data were used for this study. The first consisted of records routinely generated by Cafcass (England) and stored in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank, and the second was the 2021 England Census. The focus was on children whose initial care proceedings took place between 2015/2016 and 2020/2021 and concluded with a recorded final legal order outcome (N = 98,161). Three-level logistic regression models were employed to estimate the relationship between children's ethnicity and adoption, along with the potential moderating effects of co-ethnic density and area-level deprivation. Children's ethnicity is significantly associated with placement for adoption, with white children being more likely to be subject to placement orders compared to children from all other ethnic groups combined (Asian, black, mixed or multiple, and other ethnic groups). Higher local authority co-ethnic density considerably reduces the likelihood of adoption for children of other ethnicities besides white, but not for white children. Moreover, white children living in the most deprived LSOAs are more likely to be placed for adoption than those residing in the least deprived LSOAs. However, the likelihood of placement for adoption remains consistent across all LSOA deprivation quintiles for children from ethnicities other than white. Local authority-level deprivation does not appear to moderate the relationship between children's ethnicity and adoption. This study sheds light on the intricate relationship between ethnicity, residential context, and adoption. While previous research has indicated that white children are more likely to be adopted, the findings enhance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms influencing adoption, paving the way for a more equitable family justice system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
收养悖论:探索种族、剥夺和共同种族密度在英国护理程序中的作用
本研究的目的是:(1)检验儿童的种族与家庭护理程序结束时的最终法律命令之间的关系(1989年《儿童法》第31条),以及(2)检验居住环境,如共同种族密度和区域水平剥夺,是否调节了这种关系。 本研究使用了两个数据来源。第一个由Cafcass(英格兰)常规生成并存储在安全匿名信息链接(SAIL)数据库中的记录组成,第二个是2021年英格兰人口普查。重点是在2015/2016年至2020/2021年期间进行初步护理程序并以记录的最终法律秩序结果结束的儿童(N = 98,161)。采用三水平逻辑回归模型来估计儿童种族与收养之间的关系,以及共同种族密度和区域水平剥夺的潜在调节作用。 儿童的种族与收养安置有很大关系,与所有其他种族的儿童(亚洲人、黑人、混血儿或多种族以及其他种族)相比,白人儿童更有可能接受安置。较高的地方政府同种族密度大大降低了除白人外其他种族儿童被收养的可能性,但对白人儿童没有影响。此外,生活在最贫困地区的白人儿童比生活在最贫困地区的白人儿童更有可能被收养。然而,在所有LSOA剥夺五分之一的非白人儿童中,安置收养的可能性保持一致。地方政府层面的剥夺似乎并没有缓和儿童种族与收养之间的关系。 这项研究揭示了种族、居住环境和收养之间错综复杂的关系。虽然先前的研究表明白人儿童更有可能被收养,但这些发现增强了我们对影响收养的潜在机制的理解,为更公平的家庭司法系统铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using novel data linkage of biobank data with administrative health data to inform genomic analysis for future precision medicine treatment of congenital heart disease Common governance model: a way to avoid data segregation between existing trusted research environment Federated learning for generating synthetic data: a scoping review Health Data Governance for Research Use in Alberta Establishment of a birth-to-education cohort of 1 million Palestinian refugees using electronic medical records and electronic education records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1