Turning data into research-ready data

Van Phan, Felix Ritchie, Alex Bryson, John Forth, Lucy Stokes, Damian Whittard
{"title":"Turning data into research-ready data","authors":"Van Phan, Felix Ritchie, Alex Bryson, John Forth, Lucy Stokes, Damian Whittard","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesGovernments acquire extensive data holdings and face increasing pressure to make these available as record-level microdata for research. However, turning data into research-ready data (RRD) is not a straightforward exercise. We demonstrate how even in simple cases researcher involvement can bring substantial rewards for effective RRD development.
 MethodsThis paper reports on an ADRUK-funded project to take a dataset originally collected by the Office for National Statistics for official statistics (the UK Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, ASHE), formally review its microanalytical characteristics, link it to Census 2011 data, and prepare a new ‘research ready dataset’ with appropriate documentation and coding. This should have been straightforward as the datasets had already been widely used as research microdata. However, the involvement of academic researchers in the production of research-ready data led to many important new insights.
 ResultsThe research programme had 3 aims: testing assumptions about the data; reviewing data quality; and adding value.
 Because of its sampling model, ASHE is assumed to have random non-response both longitudinally and in cross section. The research team showed that was untrue: there was higher attrition than expected, and both longitudinal and cross-sectional non-response appeared non-random..
 The data quality review showed further concerns about the accuracy of some geographical indicators, and some variables of opaque provenance; in contrast, we confirmed the accuracy of administrative variables created by ONS.
 As well as being important for researchers, these findings have the potential for significant effects on official statistics produced from the source data, enhancing the value of the source data.
 Finally, value was added from new variables which reflected the team’s wide research interests
 ConclusionOften in government the assumption is that creating RRDs is a matter of creatign files and giving access to the researchers. Insights from our work show that the deep involvement of the research community can bring rewards for both data holders and researchers. For RRDs, researcher-led construction is vital.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"2013 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesGovernments acquire extensive data holdings and face increasing pressure to make these available as record-level microdata for research. However, turning data into research-ready data (RRD) is not a straightforward exercise. We demonstrate how even in simple cases researcher involvement can bring substantial rewards for effective RRD development. MethodsThis paper reports on an ADRUK-funded project to take a dataset originally collected by the Office for National Statistics for official statistics (the UK Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, ASHE), formally review its microanalytical characteristics, link it to Census 2011 data, and prepare a new ‘research ready dataset’ with appropriate documentation and coding. This should have been straightforward as the datasets had already been widely used as research microdata. However, the involvement of academic researchers in the production of research-ready data led to many important new insights. ResultsThe research programme had 3 aims: testing assumptions about the data; reviewing data quality; and adding value. Because of its sampling model, ASHE is assumed to have random non-response both longitudinally and in cross section. The research team showed that was untrue: there was higher attrition than expected, and both longitudinal and cross-sectional non-response appeared non-random.. The data quality review showed further concerns about the accuracy of some geographical indicators, and some variables of opaque provenance; in contrast, we confirmed the accuracy of administrative variables created by ONS. As well as being important for researchers, these findings have the potential for significant effects on official statistics produced from the source data, enhancing the value of the source data. Finally, value was added from new variables which reflected the team’s wide research interests ConclusionOften in government the assumption is that creating RRDs is a matter of creatign files and giving access to the researchers. Insights from our work show that the deep involvement of the research community can bring rewards for both data holders and researchers. For RRDs, researcher-led construction is vital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将数据转化为可供研究的数据
各国政府获得了大量数据,并面临越来越大的压力,要求将这些数据作为记录级微数据供研究使用。然而,将数据转化为可用于研究的数据(RRD)并不是一项简单的工作。我们证明,即使在简单的案例中,研究人员的参与也可以为有效的RRD开发带来可观的回报。 本文报告了一个adruk资助的项目,该项目采用最初由国家统计局收集的官方统计数据集(英国年度工作时间和收入调查,ASHE),正式审查其微观分析特征,将其与2011年人口普查数据联系起来,并准备一个新的“研究就绪数据集”,并提供适当的文档和编码。这应该是直接的,因为这些数据集已经被广泛用作研究微数据。然而,学术研究人员对研究就绪数据的生产的参与导致了许多重要的新见解。 研究计划有三个目的:检验关于数据的假设;审查数据质量;和附加值。 由于其采样模型,假设ASHE在纵向和截面上均具有随机无响应。研究小组证明这是不正确的:损耗比预期的要高,纵向和截面的非响应都是非随机的。 数据质量审查进一步表明对一些地理指标的准确性和一些来源不透明的变量的担忧;相比之下,我们证实了由国家统计局创建的管理变量的准确性。 这些发现不仅对研究人员很重要,而且有可能对从源数据产生的官方统计数据产生重大影响,从而提高源数据的价值。 最后,新的变量增加了价值,这反映了团队广泛的研究兴趣 在政府中,通常假设创建rrd是创建文件并向研究人员提供访问权限的问题。从我们的工作中得出的见解表明,研究界的深入参与可以为数据持有者和研究人员带来回报。对于rrd来说,由研究人员主导的建设至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using novel data linkage of biobank data with administrative health data to inform genomic analysis for future precision medicine treatment of congenital heart disease Common governance model: a way to avoid data segregation between existing trusted research environment Federated learning for generating synthetic data: a scoping review Health Data Governance for Research Use in Alberta Establishment of a birth-to-education cohort of 1 million Palestinian refugees using electronic medical records and electronic education records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1