The use of DOIs within government publishing: Benefits and costs

Louise Corti
{"title":"The use of DOIs within government publishing: Benefits and costs","authors":"Louise Corti","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesDigital Object Identifiers (DOI) are a standard feature within academic publishing, helping make resources findable, citable, connected, and impact-trackable. This talk describes how the UK’s Office of National Statistics has led the way in piloting their use within government and promoted the DOI system as a standard across government publishing.
 MethodsIn March 2021 a small project was conducted within ONS, led by the Secure Research Service Impact, Data Management and metadata teams, to test a small-scale implementation of DOIs - and their tracking - for its secure data catalogue (https://ons.metadata.works/domain/index.html).
 Pilot work commenced with bringing together a cross-ONS working group to appraise and discuss business and user needs for the use of DOIs within the organisation. In 2022, working closely with the British Library, ONS proposed and prepared documentation for the use of the DOI standard as a recommended standard across GOV.UK.
 ResultsIn late 2021, membership of the British Library DataCite consortium was sought to mint DOIs and implementation was planned with, and undertaken by, the SRS catalogue providers. DOIs were rolled out in early October 2022, representing the first use with UK government, and serving as a valuable pilot to evaluate both user and impact benefits, and implementation costs.
 Altmetric was secured as a tool to track mentions of DOIs across the digital landscape - to test out the efficacy of such a system for monitoring use and helping inform impact and evaluation work for data providers and data services.
 In spring 2022, the DOI standard was provisionally agreed as a recommended standard across wider UK government by the Open Standards Board and Data Standards Authority.
 ConclusionThis talk provides a valuable reflection and advice on (i) the journey of advocating for/ introducing the concept of DOIs to a government organisation, (ii) the steps required to work this up into a pilot, and (iii) the value of DOIs for impact /evaluation work within a government-led data organisation.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"145 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesDigital Object Identifiers (DOI) are a standard feature within academic publishing, helping make resources findable, citable, connected, and impact-trackable. This talk describes how the UK’s Office of National Statistics has led the way in piloting their use within government and promoted the DOI system as a standard across government publishing. MethodsIn March 2021 a small project was conducted within ONS, led by the Secure Research Service Impact, Data Management and metadata teams, to test a small-scale implementation of DOIs - and their tracking - for its secure data catalogue (https://ons.metadata.works/domain/index.html). Pilot work commenced with bringing together a cross-ONS working group to appraise and discuss business and user needs for the use of DOIs within the organisation. In 2022, working closely with the British Library, ONS proposed and prepared documentation for the use of the DOI standard as a recommended standard across GOV.UK. ResultsIn late 2021, membership of the British Library DataCite consortium was sought to mint DOIs and implementation was planned with, and undertaken by, the SRS catalogue providers. DOIs were rolled out in early October 2022, representing the first use with UK government, and serving as a valuable pilot to evaluate both user and impact benefits, and implementation costs. Altmetric was secured as a tool to track mentions of DOIs across the digital landscape - to test out the efficacy of such a system for monitoring use and helping inform impact and evaluation work for data providers and data services. In spring 2022, the DOI standard was provisionally agreed as a recommended standard across wider UK government by the Open Standards Board and Data Standards Authority. ConclusionThis talk provides a valuable reflection and advice on (i) the journey of advocating for/ introducing the concept of DOIs to a government organisation, (ii) the steps required to work this up into a pilot, and (iii) the value of DOIs for impact /evaluation work within a government-led data organisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在政府出版中使用DOIs:收益和成本
目标数字对象标识符(DOI)是学术出版中的标准功能,有助于使资源可查找、可引用、可连接和影响可跟踪。本次演讲描述了英国国家统计局如何率先在政府内部试点使用DOI系统,并将DOI系统推广为政府发布的标准。 2021年3月,在安全研究服务影响、数据管理和元数据团队的领导下,国家统计局开展了一个小项目,以测试DOIs的小规模实施及其跟踪,用于其安全数据目录(https://ons.metadata.works/domain/index.html). 试点工作开始时,召集了一个跨ons工作组,评估和讨论组织内使用doi的业务和用户需求。2022年,国家统计局与大英图书馆密切合作,提出并准备了将DOI标准作为GOV.UK推荐标准使用的文件。 结果在2021年底,大英图书馆数据中心联盟寻求成员资格来创建DOIs,并与SRS目录提供商一起计划实施并由其承担。doi于2022年10月初推出,代表了英国政府的首次使用,并作为评估用户和影响效益以及实施成本的宝贵试点。 Altmetric作为一种工具,用于跟踪整个数字环境中doi的提及情况,以测试这种系统在监测使用情况和帮助为数据提供商和数据服务提供影响和评估工作方面的有效性。 在2022年春季,DOI标准被开放标准委员会和数据标准局暂时同意作为更广泛的英国政府的推荐标准。 本讲座就以下内容提供了宝贵的反思和建议:(i)在政府机构中倡导/引入DOIs概念的过程,(ii)将其发展为试点所需的步骤,以及(iii)在政府主导的数据组织中,DOIs对影响/评估工作的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using novel data linkage of biobank data with administrative health data to inform genomic analysis for future precision medicine treatment of congenital heart disease Common governance model: a way to avoid data segregation between existing trusted research environment Federated learning for generating synthetic data: a scoping review Health Data Governance for Research Use in Alberta Establishment of a birth-to-education cohort of 1 million Palestinian refugees using electronic medical records and electronic education records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1