Sustainable development, Agenda 2030 and food security in historical perspective

IF 1 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Ekonomia i Srodowisko-Economics and Environment Pub Date : 2023-09-14 DOI:10.34659/eis.2023.85.2.560
Wiktor Szydło
{"title":"Sustainable development, Agenda 2030 and food security in historical perspective","authors":"Wiktor Szydło","doi":"10.34659/eis.2023.85.2.560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The sustainable development (SD) concept has won substantial popularity in recent decades. At the same time, neoliberalism (the socio-economic orthodoxy since the mid-1970s) is somewhat put in the shade. The paper attempts to find out whether the SD paradigm and its recent incarnation (Agenda 2030) constitutes a decisive break from the mainstream. The second aim is to assess whether the concept of food security is adequately addressed by the Agenda 2030. The study shows that Agenda 2030, with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals, is a much broader concept than preceding MDGs, but it still cannot guarantee the attainment of food security both in the short-term (the risk of commodity price bubbles) and in the longer-term (i.e. till 2030) due to the prevalence of extreme poverty, high-income inequality, structural weakness of many developing countries and inadequate global regulation.","PeriodicalId":42725,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomia i Srodowisko-Economics and Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomia i Srodowisko-Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2023.85.2.560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The sustainable development (SD) concept has won substantial popularity in recent decades. At the same time, neoliberalism (the socio-economic orthodoxy since the mid-1970s) is somewhat put in the shade. The paper attempts to find out whether the SD paradigm and its recent incarnation (Agenda 2030) constitutes a decisive break from the mainstream. The second aim is to assess whether the concept of food security is adequately addressed by the Agenda 2030. The study shows that Agenda 2030, with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals, is a much broader concept than preceding MDGs, but it still cannot guarantee the attainment of food security both in the short-term (the risk of commodity price bubbles) and in the longer-term (i.e. till 2030) due to the prevalence of extreme poverty, high-income inequality, structural weakness of many developing countries and inadequate global regulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
历史视角下的可持续发展、2030年议程和粮食安全
近几十年来,可持续发展(SD)概念赢得了广泛的欢迎。与此同时,新自由主义(自20世纪70年代中期以来的社会经济正统)在某种程度上被置于阴影之下。本文试图找出可持续发展范式及其最近的化身(2030年议程)是否构成了对主流的决定性突破。第二个目标是评估《2030年议程》是否充分处理了粮食安全的概念。研究表明,《2030年议程》的17个可持续发展目标是一个比之前的千年发展目标更广泛的概念,但由于极端贫困普遍存在、高收入不平等、许多发展中国家的结构性弱点和全球监管不足,它仍然不能保证在短期(商品价格泡沫的风险)和长期(即到2030年)实现粮食安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Analysis of road accident causes in the voivodships in the years 2014-2021 in the aspect of socio-economic costs – towards the implementation of sustainable development Analysis of the types and effects of possible errors in the implementation of ecological reusable packaging into e-commerce using FMEA Characteristics of sewage sludge composition for agricultural use Barriers influencing purchase behaviour of green personal care products – integrating innovation resistance theory perspective and stages of change model The role of rivers in creating a blue-green city economy on the example of Wroclaw and Gdansk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1