Improving lives by linking data: Views from groups with complex needs. Commissioned by the cross-government Better Outcomes through Linked Data programme and the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, and delivered by the research agency Britain Thinks

Dean Fell, Loulwa Al Rasheed-Wright
{"title":"Improving lives by linking data: Views from groups with complex needs. Commissioned by the cross-government Better Outcomes through Linked Data programme and the Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation, and delivered by the research agency Britain Thinks","authors":"Dean Fell, Loulwa Al Rasheed-Wright","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives
 
 Improve and refine BOLD's delivery of its four pilot projects via feedback on acceptable uses and forms of analysis of shared data.
 Inform how BOLD communicates its aims and progress for maximum clarity and transparency.
 Understand the impact of BOLD's data management on the level of trust in the program.
 
 MethodsInitial workshops were conducted with expert intermediary organisations, such as charities, who have a deep understanding of each of the audiences’ attitudes and needs. This was to explain the purpose of the project to the intermediary organisations and to gain their feedback on the approach and materials.
 Fieldwork was undertaken with 82 participants from across the four vulnerability audiences, using a combination of methods to ensure full participation from a range of individuals with differing levels of need.
 Participants were presented with information about BOLD's purpose, objectives, and three example scenarios related to their respective pilot to prompt useful discussions.
 Results
 
 Participants in the BOLD program pilots generally support data sharing to improve public services.
 They view the program positively, have similar experiences across pilot areas, and reflect on its relevance to a range of audiences.
 However, some lack experience with issues addressed by BOLD. Concerns exist regarding negative impacts and scepticism towards government.
 BOLD use cases should prioritise four principles: relevance, impact, clarity, and non-stigmatisation.
 Intermediary organisations are crucial for engaging with pilot audiences.
 
 ConclusionBOLD is a three-year cross government pilot project that links social policy datasets to better support individuals with complex needs. It aims to improve outcomes by providing new evidence and insight into how services delivered in one part of government affect outcomes in another. This research was commissioned to inform how to take the BOLD programme forward, by engaging and consulting with relevant audiences in an ethical and transparent way.
 The published findings are informing the delivery of BOLD and improving and enhancing our understanding of the impact of BOLD's data management on trust.","PeriodicalId":132937,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Population Data Science","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i2.2320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives Improve and refine BOLD's delivery of its four pilot projects via feedback on acceptable uses and forms of analysis of shared data. Inform how BOLD communicates its aims and progress for maximum clarity and transparency. Understand the impact of BOLD's data management on the level of trust in the program. MethodsInitial workshops were conducted with expert intermediary organisations, such as charities, who have a deep understanding of each of the audiences’ attitudes and needs. This was to explain the purpose of the project to the intermediary organisations and to gain their feedback on the approach and materials. Fieldwork was undertaken with 82 participants from across the four vulnerability audiences, using a combination of methods to ensure full participation from a range of individuals with differing levels of need. Participants were presented with information about BOLD's purpose, objectives, and three example scenarios related to their respective pilot to prompt useful discussions. Results Participants in the BOLD program pilots generally support data sharing to improve public services. They view the program positively, have similar experiences across pilot areas, and reflect on its relevance to a range of audiences. However, some lack experience with issues addressed by BOLD. Concerns exist regarding negative impacts and scepticism towards government. BOLD use cases should prioritise four principles: relevance, impact, clarity, and non-stigmatisation. Intermediary organisations are crucial for engaging with pilot audiences. ConclusionBOLD is a three-year cross government pilot project that links social policy datasets to better support individuals with complex needs. It aims to improve outcomes by providing new evidence and insight into how services delivered in one part of government affect outcomes in another. This research was commissioned to inform how to take the BOLD programme forward, by engaging and consulting with relevant audiences in an ethical and transparent way. The published findings are informing the delivery of BOLD and improving and enhancing our understanding of the impact of BOLD's data management on trust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过数据链接改善生活:来自具有复杂需求群体的观点。该报告由跨政府的“通过关联数据获得更好的结果”项目和数据伦理与创新中心委托,由研究机构“英国思考”(Britain Thinks)提供
目标# x0D;& # x0D;通过对共享数据的可接受用途和分析形式的反馈,改进和完善BOLD的四个试点项目的交付。告知BOLD如何传达其目标和进展,以达到最大的清晰度和透明度。 了解BOLD的数据管理对项目信任水平的影响。 & # x0D;方法与慈善机构等专业中介机构进行初步研讨会,这些机构对每个受众的态度和需求都有深入的了解。这是为了向中介机构解释项目的目的,并获得他们对方法和材料的反馈。来自四个脆弱性受众的82名参与者进行了实地调查,使用了多种方法,以确保具有不同需求水平的一系列个人的充分参与。向参与者介绍了BOLD的目的、目标以及与各自试点相关的三个示例场景的信息,以促进有益的讨论。结果# x0D;& # x0D;BOLD项目试点的参与者普遍支持数据共享,以改善公共服务。他们对该项目持积极态度,在各个试点地区都有类似的经历,并反思该项目与一系列受众的相关性。然而,一些国家缺乏BOLD解决问题的经验。人们对政府的负面影响和怀疑态度表示担忧。BOLD用例应该优先考虑四个原则:相关性、影响、清晰度和非污名化。 中介组织对于吸引试点受众至关重要。 & # x0D;bold是一个为期三年的跨政府试点项目,将社会政策数据集联系起来,更好地支持有复杂需求的个人。它旨在通过提供新的证据和见解,了解政府一个部门提供的服务如何影响另一个部门的结果,从而改善结果。委托进行这项研究的目的是,通过以道德和透明的方式与相关受众进行接触和协商,为如何推进BOLD计划提供信息。已发表的研究结果为BOLD的实施提供了信息,并改善和加强了我们对BOLD数据管理对信任的影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using novel data linkage of biobank data with administrative health data to inform genomic analysis for future precision medicine treatment of congenital heart disease Common governance model: a way to avoid data segregation between existing trusted research environment Federated learning for generating synthetic data: a scoping review Health Data Governance for Research Use in Alberta Establishment of a birth-to-education cohort of 1 million Palestinian refugees using electronic medical records and electronic education records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1