Access to Immunoglobulin Treatment for CIDP Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Vincent Brissette, Laurence Poirier, Rami Massie, Colin Chalk, Fraser Moore
{"title":"Access to Immunoglobulin Treatment for CIDP Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Vincent Brissette, Laurence Poirier, Rami Massie, Colin Chalk, Fraser Moore","doi":"10.26443/mjm.v21i1.964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Immunoglobulin supplies are limited; their access for patients diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) may have been difficult during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with CIDP patients (n=16, 68.8% female, mean age 60.4±11.3) recruited from three Montreal tertiary care institutions. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years old who were receiving immunoglobulin treatment as of March 1st, 2020. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire inquiring about changes in their immunoglobulin treatment during the pandemic and about their quality of life. Their charts were reviewed by an independent investigator. We used weighted chi-squared statistical tests and Cramer’s V correlation ratios to measure associations with treatment change. Results: Eighteen months after the pandemic started, 50% of patients were receiving the same treatment, 25% were receiving immunoglobulin treatment at a different frequency, 6.3% were receiving a different dose, 12.5% were receiving a different dose and frequency, and 6.3% were receiving a different treatment. Reasons associated with treatment change were worsening of neurological condition (18.8%; Cramer’s V=0.480; p-value=0.055), improvement of neurological condition (25%; Cramer’s V=0.577; p-value=0.021) and reduced availability of treatment (6.3%; Cramer’s V=0.258; p-value=0.302). There were no significant correlations between lower quality of life (p-value=0.323) or lower Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale score (p-value=0.574) and treatment change. Conclusion: Difficulty accessing immunoglobulin treatment was infrequent and not significantly associated with treatment change for CIDP patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. A larger multicentre study across multiple sites might identify other treatment access problems resulting from the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":18292,"journal":{"name":"McGill Journal of Medicine","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"McGill Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26443/mjm.v21i1.964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immunoglobulin supplies are limited; their access for patients diagnosed with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) may have been difficult during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted with CIDP patients (n=16, 68.8% female, mean age 60.4±11.3) recruited from three Montreal tertiary care institutions. Inclusion criteria were patients over 18 years old who were receiving immunoglobulin treatment as of March 1st, 2020. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire inquiring about changes in their immunoglobulin treatment during the pandemic and about their quality of life. Their charts were reviewed by an independent investigator. We used weighted chi-squared statistical tests and Cramer’s V correlation ratios to measure associations with treatment change. Results: Eighteen months after the pandemic started, 50% of patients were receiving the same treatment, 25% were receiving immunoglobulin treatment at a different frequency, 6.3% were receiving a different dose, 12.5% were receiving a different dose and frequency, and 6.3% were receiving a different treatment. Reasons associated with treatment change were worsening of neurological condition (18.8%; Cramer’s V=0.480; p-value=0.055), improvement of neurological condition (25%; Cramer’s V=0.577; p-value=0.021) and reduced availability of treatment (6.3%; Cramer’s V=0.258; p-value=0.302). There were no significant correlations between lower quality of life (p-value=0.323) or lower Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale score (p-value=0.574) and treatment change. Conclusion: Difficulty accessing immunoglobulin treatment was infrequent and not significantly associated with treatment change for CIDP patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. A larger multicentre study across multiple sites might identify other treatment access problems resulting from the pandemic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间CIDP患者免疫球蛋白治疗的可及性
背景:免疫球蛋白供应有限;在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,诊断为慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多神经根神经病变(CIDP)的患者可能很难获得这些药物。方法:对来自蒙特利尔三所三级医疗机构的CIDP患者(n=16,女性68.8%,平均年龄60.4±11.3)进行回顾性横断面研究。纳入标准为截至2020年3月1日正在接受免疫球蛋白治疗的18岁以上患者。患者被要求完成一份调查问卷,询问他们在大流行期间免疫球蛋白治疗的变化以及他们的生活质量。他们的病历由一名独立调查员审阅。我们使用加权卡方统计检验和克莱默V相关比来衡量与治疗变化的相关性。结果:大流行开始18个月后,50%的患者接受相同的治疗,25%的患者接受不同频率的免疫球蛋白治疗,6.3%的患者接受不同的剂量,12.5%的患者接受不同的剂量和频率,6.3%的患者接受不同的治疗。与治疗改变相关的原因是神经系统状况恶化(18.8%;克莱姆V = 0.480;p值=0.055),神经状况改善(25%;克莱姆V = 0.577;p值=0.021)和治疗可获得性降低(6.3%;克莱姆V = 0.258;假定值= 0.302)。较低的生活质量(p值=0.323)或较低的Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale评分(p值=0.574)与治疗改变之间无显著相关性。结论:COVID-19大流行期间,CIDP患者难以获得免疫球蛋白治疗的情况并不多见,且与治疗变化无显著相关性。在多个地点进行更大规模的多中心研究,可能会确定大流行造成的其他治疗获取问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Healthy Brains Healthy Lives 2024 Symposium Ontario Student Medical Education Research Conference (OSMERC) 2024 Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a call for change in reporting practices Advance Care Directives: A Herzl Clinic Quality Improvement Project on Patients' perspectives Children’s health-related experiences in India: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1