A Move Analysis of Dissertation Introductions Written by Native English Speakers and Indonesian PhD Students across Disciplines

Q2 Arts and Humanities rEFLections Pub Date : 2023-08-25 DOI:10.61508/refl.v30i2.267462
Dian Candra Prasetyanti, Angkana Tongpoon-Patanasorn
{"title":"A Move Analysis of Dissertation Introductions Written by Native English Speakers and Indonesian PhD Students across Disciplines","authors":"Dian Candra Prasetyanti, Angkana Tongpoon-Patanasorn","doi":"10.61508/refl.v30i2.267462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dissertation introductions (DIs) have received on-going attention because they are considered to be the most challenging and difficult part of an academic text for graduate students, particularly for non-native English speakers (NNES). However, research that has investigated DIs written by native English speakers (NES) and by NNES, particularly Indonesian (IND) PhD students across various disciplines, is lacking. This paper presents an analysis of moves in the introductory section of 200 dissertations written by NES and IND PhD students in terms of move organization based on Bunton’s (2002) adaptation of the CARS framework. The corpus consisted of 200 DIs from the disciplines of physics, linguistics, engineering, and education that were published online on the ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Database. The findings revealed that both NES and IND PhD students followed the moves and steps presented in the framework to create their introduction sections. However, it was also found that only 13 DIs (7%) followed Bunton’s CARS in this research, but most of them were not constructed in the way assumed in CARS because a number of move reversals and recursives were found. There were both similarities and differences between NNES and NES writers in the introduction sections with regard to the frequency of move-step occurrences, move-step classifications, patterns, and new steps. Similar findings between the NNES and NES writers appeal for the need to make teachers and L2 learners as well as L1 Ph.D. writers aware of methods for writing precise and concise DIs","PeriodicalId":36332,"journal":{"name":"rEFLections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"rEFLections","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v30i2.267462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dissertation introductions (DIs) have received on-going attention because they are considered to be the most challenging and difficult part of an academic text for graduate students, particularly for non-native English speakers (NNES). However, research that has investigated DIs written by native English speakers (NES) and by NNES, particularly Indonesian (IND) PhD students across various disciplines, is lacking. This paper presents an analysis of moves in the introductory section of 200 dissertations written by NES and IND PhD students in terms of move organization based on Bunton’s (2002) adaptation of the CARS framework. The corpus consisted of 200 DIs from the disciplines of physics, linguistics, engineering, and education that were published online on the ProQuest Dissertation and Theses Database. The findings revealed that both NES and IND PhD students followed the moves and steps presented in the framework to create their introduction sections. However, it was also found that only 13 DIs (7%) followed Bunton’s CARS in this research, but most of them were not constructed in the way assumed in CARS because a number of move reversals and recursives were found. There were both similarities and differences between NNES and NES writers in the introduction sections with regard to the frequency of move-step occurrences, move-step classifications, patterns, and new steps. Similar findings between the NNES and NES writers appeal for the need to make teachers and L2 learners as well as L1 Ph.D. writers aware of methods for writing precise and concise DIs
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以英语为母语的印尼博士生跨学科论文介绍的动态分析
论文介绍(DIs)已经收到了持续的关注,因为他们被认为是研究生学术文本中最具挑战性和困难的部分,特别是对于非英语母语人士(NNES)。然而,对以英语为母语的人(NES)和以英语为母语的人(NNES),特别是印度尼西亚(IND)博士生在各个学科中撰写的DIs进行调查的研究是缺乏的。本文在Bunton(2002)对CARS框架的改编基础上,对NES和IND博士生撰写的200篇论文的引言部分中的移动进行了分析。该语料库由200篇发表在ProQuest论文和论文数据库上的论文组成,这些论文来自物理学、语言学、工程学和教育学等学科。研究结果显示,东北理工学院和印度理工学院的博士生都遵循了框架中提出的步骤和步骤来创建他们的介绍部分。然而,我们也发现,在本研究中,只有13个DIs(7%)遵循了Bunton的CARS,但由于发现了许多移动逆转和递归,大多数DIs并没有按照CARS中假设的方式构建。在介绍部分,NNES和NES作者在移动步出现的频率、移动步分类、模式和新步方面既有相似之处,也有不同之处。NNES和NES作者之间的类似发现呼吁教师和第二语言学习者以及第一语言博士作者意识到编写精确和简洁的论文的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
rEFLections
rEFLections Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Verb Error Analysis of Thai EFL Generation Z and Generation Alpha Students in Thailand English-Medium Instruction in Higher Education A Bibliometric Analysis of Keywords of HyFlex Learning for the English Language Learning Skills of Teacher Students Vlogging: An Alternative to Role-play in Improving EFL Learners' Conversation Skills English for Business Communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1