Effect of music therapy intervention on anxiety and pain during percutaneous renal biopsy: a randomized controlled trial

NDT Plus Pub Date : 2023-10-06 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfad246
Filippo Giordano, Adele Mitrotti, Antonia Losurdo, Flavia Esposito, Antonio Granata, Alessandra Pesino, Michele Rossini, Patrizia Natale, Vincenzo Dileo, Marco Fiorentino, Loreto Gesualdo
{"title":"Effect of music therapy intervention on anxiety and pain during percutaneous renal biopsy: a randomized controlled trial","authors":"Filippo Giordano, Adele Mitrotti, Antonia Losurdo, Flavia Esposito, Antonio Granata, Alessandra Pesino, Michele Rossini, Patrizia Natale, Vincenzo Dileo, Marco Fiorentino, Loreto Gesualdo","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfad246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) may subject patients to emotional distress and pain before and during the biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of complementary/non-pharmacological interventions such as music therapy (MT) on anxiety, pain and satisfaction in renal patients undergoing PRB. Methods A prospective, single-centre, single-blind, randomized controlled two-arm trial was conducted. Patients ≥18 years of age, hospitalized at the Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit (Bari, Italy) and scheduled for PRB were screened. Participants were assigned to standard treatment (CG) or to the music therapy (MT) intervention group. Participants in the MT group received standard care and an MT intervention by a certified music therapist qualified in guided imagery and music. The CG patients received the standard of care. MT and CG patients were subjected to identical measurements (pre/post) of the parameters in the State Trait Anxiety Inventory Y1 (STAI-Y1), visual analogue scale for pain (VAS-P) and satisfaction (VAS-S) and heart rate variability. Results A statistically significant difference in the anxiety scores after PRB between MT and CG patients (STAI-Y1 35.4 ± 6.2 versus 42.9 ± 9.0) was observed. MT also had strong and significant effects on VAS-P compared with CG (5.0 ± 1.4 versus 6.3 ± 1.3, respectively; P < .001) and VAS-S (7.8 ± 1.0 versus 6.0 ± 0.9, respectively; P < .001). Decreased activity of the sympathetic nervous system and increased activity of the parasympathetic nervous system was observed after PRB in the MT group. Conclusion Our study supports the use of MT to mitigate the psychological anxiety, pain and sympathetic activation associated with PRB.","PeriodicalId":18987,"journal":{"name":"NDT Plus","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NDT Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) may subject patients to emotional distress and pain before and during the biopsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of complementary/non-pharmacological interventions such as music therapy (MT) on anxiety, pain and satisfaction in renal patients undergoing PRB. Methods A prospective, single-centre, single-blind, randomized controlled two-arm trial was conducted. Patients ≥18 years of age, hospitalized at the Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Unit (Bari, Italy) and scheduled for PRB were screened. Participants were assigned to standard treatment (CG) or to the music therapy (MT) intervention group. Participants in the MT group received standard care and an MT intervention by a certified music therapist qualified in guided imagery and music. The CG patients received the standard of care. MT and CG patients were subjected to identical measurements (pre/post) of the parameters in the State Trait Anxiety Inventory Y1 (STAI-Y1), visual analogue scale for pain (VAS-P) and satisfaction (VAS-S) and heart rate variability. Results A statistically significant difference in the anxiety scores after PRB between MT and CG patients (STAI-Y1 35.4 ± 6.2 versus 42.9 ± 9.0) was observed. MT also had strong and significant effects on VAS-P compared with CG (5.0 ± 1.4 versus 6.3 ± 1.3, respectively; P < .001) and VAS-S (7.8 ± 1.0 versus 6.0 ± 0.9, respectively; P < .001). Decreased activity of the sympathetic nervous system and increased activity of the parasympathetic nervous system was observed after PRB in the MT group. Conclusion Our study supports the use of MT to mitigate the psychological anxiety, pain and sympathetic activation associated with PRB.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐治疗干预对经皮肾活检中焦虑和疼痛的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:经皮肾活检(PRB)可能使患者在活检前和活检过程中出现情绪困扰和疼痛。本研究的目的是评估辅助/非药物干预,如音乐治疗(MT)对肾脏患者接受PRB的焦虑,疼痛和满意度的影响。方法采用前瞻性、单中心、单盲、随机对照的两组试验。筛选年龄≥18岁、在肾内科、透析和移植科(意大利Bari)住院并计划进行PRB的患者。参与者被分配到标准治疗(CG)或音乐治疗(MT)干预组。MT组的参与者接受标准治疗和MT干预,由具有引导意象和音乐资格的认证音乐治疗师进行。CG患者接受标准治疗。MT和CG患者在状态-特质焦虑量表Y1 (STAI-Y1)、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-P)和满意度视觉模拟量表(VAS-S)和心率变异性中进行相同的参数测量(前/后)。结果MT与CG患者PRB后焦虑评分(STAI-Y1 35.4±6.2比42.9±9.0)差异有统计学意义。与CG相比,MT对VAS-P也有较强的显著影响(分别为5.0±1.4和6.3±1.3);P, lt;.001)和VAS-S分别为7.8±1.0对6.0±0.9;P, lt;措施)。MT组PRB后交感神经系统活性降低,副交感神经系统活性升高。结论我们的研究支持使用MT减轻与PRB相关的心理焦虑、疼痛和交感神经激活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sleep apnea syndrome prevalence in chronic kidney disease and end stage kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mechanisms and treatment of Obesity-Related Hypertension: Part 1. Mechanisms Twenty years of the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network Replacing a kidney biopsy by exome sequencing in undetermined kidney diseases – not yet ready for prime time! Kidney and urine cell transcriptomics in IgA nephropathy and lupus nephritis: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1