Discharge Estimation Using Video Recordings from Small Unoccupied Aircraft Systems

IF 2.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Hydraulic Engineering Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1061/jhend8.hyeng-13591
Jennifer G. Duan, Frank L. Engel, Ammon Cadogan
{"title":"Discharge Estimation Using Video Recordings from Small Unoccupied Aircraft Systems","authors":"Jennifer G. Duan, Frank L. Engel, Ammon Cadogan","doi":"10.1061/jhend8.hyeng-13591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurement of river discharge during flooding events has especially been a challenging and dangerous task in the southwestern US, where flows can be flashy, laden with sediment, and at high velocity. Small unoccupied aircraft systems (sUAS) can be deployed to access unsafe field sites and capture imagery for measuring surface flow velocity and discharge. This paper compares flow discharge estimation at eight field sites—located at or near USGS gauging stations—using time-averaged surface velocities and the turbulence dissipation rate (TDR) derived from large-scale particle image velocimetry (LSPIV) analysis of sUAS videos with conventional measurement techniques conducted by professional USGS hydrographers. Sites characteristics include both natural and engineered channels. The conventional measured discharges were treated as the reference discharges for evaluating the accuracy of the LSPIV discharge estimates. This study evaluated four approaches to estimate the depth-averaged or cross-sectional averaged velocity: constant-velocity index, logarithmic law, power-law, and the entropy method. Results showed the discharges can be accurately calculated by using any of these methods, and that choice of method depended on width to depth ratios.Practical ApplicationsAccurate measurement of water quantity is of vital importance to water resource managers, forecasters, and the public. Often, such as during floods, conditions at the river can be very dangerous to the crews responsible for such measurements. Small unoccupied aircraft systems (or drones) are proving to be an excellent tool for quantifying river flows using methods that do not involve directly entering flooding rivers. By using video collected from drones, we show that it is possible for practitioners to accurately measure flow discharge during in rivers and canals. We evaluate four methods for completing the task, and offer suggestions based on our findings. Although more research is needed to perfect the methods, we find that it is possible to accurately measure river flows using video from sUAS, and thus potentially improve safety for those put in harm’s way.","PeriodicalId":16046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydraulic Engineering","volume":"132 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydraulic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jhend8.hyeng-13591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurement of river discharge during flooding events has especially been a challenging and dangerous task in the southwestern US, where flows can be flashy, laden with sediment, and at high velocity. Small unoccupied aircraft systems (sUAS) can be deployed to access unsafe field sites and capture imagery for measuring surface flow velocity and discharge. This paper compares flow discharge estimation at eight field sites—located at or near USGS gauging stations—using time-averaged surface velocities and the turbulence dissipation rate (TDR) derived from large-scale particle image velocimetry (LSPIV) analysis of sUAS videos with conventional measurement techniques conducted by professional USGS hydrographers. Sites characteristics include both natural and engineered channels. The conventional measured discharges were treated as the reference discharges for evaluating the accuracy of the LSPIV discharge estimates. This study evaluated four approaches to estimate the depth-averaged or cross-sectional averaged velocity: constant-velocity index, logarithmic law, power-law, and the entropy method. Results showed the discharges can be accurately calculated by using any of these methods, and that choice of method depended on width to depth ratios.Practical ApplicationsAccurate measurement of water quantity is of vital importance to water resource managers, forecasters, and the public. Often, such as during floods, conditions at the river can be very dangerous to the crews responsible for such measurements. Small unoccupied aircraft systems (or drones) are proving to be an excellent tool for quantifying river flows using methods that do not involve directly entering flooding rivers. By using video collected from drones, we show that it is possible for practitioners to accurately measure flow discharge during in rivers and canals. We evaluate four methods for completing the task, and offer suggestions based on our findings. Although more research is needed to perfect the methods, we find that it is possible to accurately measure river flows using video from sUAS, and thus potentially improve safety for those put in harm’s way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用小型无人飞机系统录像进行放电估计
在美国西南部,洪水期间测量河流流量是一项具有挑战性和危险性的任务,因为那里的水流可能很湍急,充满沉积物,而且速度很快。小型无人飞机系统(sUAS)可以部署到不安全的现场,并捕获图像以测量表面流速和流量。本文比较了位于美国地质勘探局测量站或附近的8个实地站点的流量估计,使用时间平均地表速度和湍流耗散率(TDR),这些湍流耗散率(TDR)来自于sUAS视频的大尺度粒子图像测速(LSPIV)分析,与美国地质勘探局专业水文测量人员进行的常规测量技术。场地的特点包括自然通道和工程通道。将常规测量的放电作为参考放电,以评估LSPIV放电估计的准确性。本研究评估了四种估计深度平均或横截面平均速度的方法:等速指数法、对数法、幂律法和熵法。结果表明,采用任意一种方法均能准确地计算出放水量,方法的选择取决于宽深比。实际应用水量的准确测量对水资源管理者、预报员和公众至关重要。通常情况下,比如在洪水期间,河流的状况对负责此类测量的工作人员来说是非常危险的。小型无人飞机系统(或无人机)被证明是量化河流流量的绝佳工具,使用的方法不需要直接进入洪水泛滥的河流。通过使用无人机收集的视频,我们表明从业者可以准确地测量河流和运河中的流量。我们评估了四种完成任务的方法,并根据我们的发现提出了建议。虽然需要更多的研究来完善这些方法,但我们发现,使用sUAS的视频准确测量河流流量是可能的,从而有可能提高那些处于危险中的人的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hydraulic Engineering accepts original contributions that describe the analysis and solutions of problems in hydraulic engineering. Technical Notes may present a problem, without solution, of common interest. Topics range from flows in closed conduits to free-surface flows (canals, rivers, lakes, and estuaries) to environmental fluid dynamics. Topics include transport processes involving fluids (multiphase flows) such as sediment and contaminant transport, and heat and gas transfers. Emphasis is placed on the presentation of concepts, methods, techniques, and results that advance knowledge and/or are suitable for general application in the hydraulic engineering profession.
期刊最新文献
Alcohol and cannabis co-use: Receptiveness to treatments and application to intervention planning. Effects of Air Vent Size and Location Design on Air Supply Efficiency in Flood Discharge Tunnel Operations Experimental Design and Protocol for Standardized Measurements of Rock Erodibility in Fluvial Impact Erosion Impacts of Rigid Vegetation on Gravity Currents Propagating in a Stratified Environment Process-Based Design Method for Pier Local Scour Depth under Clear-Water Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1