{"title":"Socio-political barriers to sustainable urban water governance: the case of Cartagena, Colombia","authors":"Andrea Sullivan Lemaitre, Justin Stoler","doi":"10.1080/02508060.2023.2256643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTSocio-political factors shape urban water insecurity, yet are often not incorporated into urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) planning. WASH service coverage rates in Cartagena, Colombia, suggest high water security, yet the history of water policy and governance in the city from 1991 to 2019 reveals a more complex reality of water insecurity that is not reflected in service coverage indicators. This case study bridges scientific enquiry with policy to demonstrate how weak institutions and governance at municipal levels undermine local water security and the implementation of national sustainable development policy.KEYWORDS: Urban water securityWASH policysustainable developmentLatin America and Caribbeanwater governanceterritoryColombia AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the stakeholders and community members in Cartagena who provided local insights and information.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1. The UN addresses water insecurity in SDG 6: ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’ (UN, 2015).2. As defined by UN-Water: ‘Water security is defined here as the capacity of a population to safeguard sustainable access to adequate quantities of acceptable quality water for sustaining livelihoods, human well-being, and socio-economic development, for ensuring protection against water-borne pollution and water-related disasters, and for preserving ecosystems in a climate of peace and political stability’ (UN-Water, Citation2013).3. Article 94 calls for sustainable availability of potable water from the Ciénaga de la Virgen marsh and Dique Canal for the needs of the city and region. Article 95 calls for watershed and environmental management and to assure clean water for potable use (POT Cartagena, Citation2001, p. 54).4. Article 95 calls for watershed and environmental management and to assure clean water for potable use (POT Cartagena, Citation2001, p. 54).5. An immitigable high-risk zone is an area under threat from natural disasters such as landslides and is deemed unsuitable for living (POT Cartagena, Citation2001, pp. 60–66).Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the National Science Foundation, grant number BCS-1759972.","PeriodicalId":49371,"journal":{"name":"Water International","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2023.2256643","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTSocio-political factors shape urban water insecurity, yet are often not incorporated into urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) planning. WASH service coverage rates in Cartagena, Colombia, suggest high water security, yet the history of water policy and governance in the city from 1991 to 2019 reveals a more complex reality of water insecurity that is not reflected in service coverage indicators. This case study bridges scientific enquiry with policy to demonstrate how weak institutions and governance at municipal levels undermine local water security and the implementation of national sustainable development policy.KEYWORDS: Urban water securityWASH policysustainable developmentLatin America and Caribbeanwater governanceterritoryColombia AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the stakeholders and community members in Cartagena who provided local insights and information.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Notes1. The UN addresses water insecurity in SDG 6: ‘Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all’ (UN, 2015).2. As defined by UN-Water: ‘Water security is defined here as the capacity of a population to safeguard sustainable access to adequate quantities of acceptable quality water for sustaining livelihoods, human well-being, and socio-economic development, for ensuring protection against water-borne pollution and water-related disasters, and for preserving ecosystems in a climate of peace and political stability’ (UN-Water, Citation2013).3. Article 94 calls for sustainable availability of potable water from the Ciénaga de la Virgen marsh and Dique Canal for the needs of the city and region. Article 95 calls for watershed and environmental management and to assure clean water for potable use (POT Cartagena, Citation2001, p. 54).4. Article 95 calls for watershed and environmental management and to assure clean water for potable use (POT Cartagena, Citation2001, p. 54).5. An immitigable high-risk zone is an area under threat from natural disasters such as landslides and is deemed unsuitable for living (POT Cartagena, Citation2001, pp. 60–66).Additional informationFundingThis study was supported by the National Science Foundation, grant number BCS-1759972.
期刊介绍:
Water International is the official journal of the International Water Resources Association (IWRA), founded in 1972 to serve as an international gateway to the people, ideas and networks that are critical to the sustainable management of water resources around the world. Water International''s articles, state-of-the-art reviews, technical notes and other matter are policy-relevant and aimed at communicating in-depth knowledge to a multidisciplinary and international community. Water International publishes both individual contributions and thematic special issues and sections on cutting edge issues.
All individual manuscript submissions are subject to initial appraisal and peer review by the Deputy Editor in Chief and the Associate Editors, and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by at least one independent, anonymous expert referee. All external peer review is double blind. Thematic issues and sections are handled under comparable procedures by guest editors under the oversight of the Editor in Chief.